#17034: New user interface for orthogonal arrays and a .explain_construction
method
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | c7eae7de7591d2f8f9c2f4de13396307ac210028
u/vdelecroix/17034 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Replying to [comment:17 ncohen]:
> This being said, I plan on adding new functions to "list all 'k' such
that there exists an `OA(k,n)`", or similar functions for incomplete
orthogonal arrays, and those functions may be used by both developpers and
users.
You meant list all `n` I guess. Yes, that would be cool!
> > These are one line functions and it would cost nothing to make them
not call each other.
>
> Why is it a problem if they call each other ?
Function calls cost. I do not like using `OA_is_available` rather than
`orthogonal_array` directly.
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17034#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
