#11912: Clarify simplify_radical and Maxima's radcan
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  kcrisman           |        Owner:  mvngu
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  documentation      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  sd48               |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Michael Orlitzky   |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/mjo/ticket/11912                 |  e5ab33994355520f0f27914f73f1680292eadc3d
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by mjo):

 Replying to [comment:19 kcrisman]:
 >
 > Hmm.  So should this even be called `canonicalize_radical` or maybe
 something else that indicates it doesn't just do radicals?  I wonder why
 they chose that name in Maxima - maybe there is something in the algorithm
 that is 'radical'?  (Pun intended.)

 Maybe you just have to think of the complex square root in terms of the
 complex exponential and logarithm, at which point it becomes OK for
 `canonicalize_radical()` to affect certain log/exp expressions?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11912#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to