#6441: [with patch, needs review] Charpoly (plus adjoint and det)
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  spancratz       |       Owner:  somebody               
     Type:  defect          |      Status:  new                    
 Priority:  minor           |   Milestone:  sage-4.1.1             
Component:  linear algebra  |    Keywords:  charpoly, division-free
 Reviewer:                  |      Author:  Sebastian Pancratz     
   Merged:                  |  
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------

Comment(by spancratz):

 Dear Rob,

 Thanks for taking up the review.  I am sorry for the delayed reply --- I
 was racing at the Tour of Wales for the last five days and am only back in
 Oxford now.  That said, I'll try to get back to you about all the points
 as soon as possible.

 1.  That makes sense; I just went through the file sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx
 and tried to make these changes whenever suitable.

 2.  I wasn't quite sure about this when writing the comments in the first
 place, but when looking at the code I think I saw three different ways to
 put this:  no inner quotation marks, double inner quotation marks ", and
 single inner quotation marks '.  Thus I haven't changed this yet.

 3.  I've removed the periods at the of the error messages.  Moreover, I
 agree it should be a ValueError instead of an ArithmeticError.  I've also
 changed this in other methods in the same file, which I didn't changed
 before.

 4.  Again, I went through the whole file and hopefully made suitable
 changes.

 5.  Done.

 6.  I still need to do this.

 7.  That makes sense.  I still have to do that.

 8.  Actually, this did not work the last couple of times I tried.  The
 problem seems to be that SAGE (although it is set up to use the clone
 "sage-seb") tries to build the documentation from "sage-main".  So while
 I'd be happy to build the documentation and check everything is formatted
 properly, I don't know how to do this.

 9.  Sure, I'll do this once I have made all these changes.

 Of course, I don't mind the advice at all, thank you very much!  Actually,
 I think it's much easier to have these points spelled out explicitly at
 least once...

 I'll try make the suggested changes and attach a new file to this thread
 during the next few days.

 Many thanks,

 Sebastian

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6441#comment:6>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to