#6441: [with patch, needs review] Charpoly (plus adjoint and det)
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: spancratz | Owner: somebody
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.1.1
Component: linear algebra | Keywords: charpoly, division-free
Reviewer: | Author: Sebastian Pancratz
Merged: |
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment(by rbeezer):
Hi Sebastian,
Cycle racing? Following in Cavendish's footsteps? ;-)
Quoting (2), and author's names (7), are open to debate, so don't take my
word as gospel. I keep threatening to write up something that will help
folks through this sort of thing on their first attempt. I know a lot was
a mystery to me first time through.
(8) Building the docs, try:[[BR]]
sage -br # reports which branch you are really using[[BR]]
sage -b # should touch (copy, really) changed files in branch[[BR]]
sage -docbuild reference html # do it[[BR]]
I have one (small) Sage routine I am working on myself right now, then
I'll give this much more attention. I read through [Se02] and was a bit
put off by the notation, but I'll knuckle down and try to make some sense
of that as well. So, I'll attend to this, but I'm in no great rush, so
just put up a patch when you're not racing.
Rob
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6441#comment:7>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
