#17898: Removal of wrong stopgap
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: stopgap, | Merged in:
partitions | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Authors: Anne Schilling | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 39142901893bc0207e8271ccd4772469fe958e0f
public/ticket/17898 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:8 aschilling]:
> The stopgap that is currently in Sage now pops up all over Sage in
situations where IntegerListsLex is used within the range of parameters
and hence totally fine. It just scares users unnecessarily. Also, it does
not point the user to the documentation where the limitations are listed.
I agree with all of this, but just removing the stopgap isn't the right
solution.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17898#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
