#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers:
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 611f5c73f0d5b8af4c150abc1785e5ea305b164d
public/ticket/17979 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:165 nthiery]:
> However I believe that this is out of the scope of this ticket,
> especially since this would require a change in the specifications
Where was it specified that lists with trailing zeros are identified '''up
to max_length'''? It makes absolutely no sense at all that these two
questions give a different answer:
{{{
sage: [2,2,0,0] in IntegerListsLex(4,min_length=3,max_length=4)
sage: [2,2,0,0,0] in IntegerListsLex(4,min_length=3,max_length=4)
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:166>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
