#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers:
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | ad238f9f80726ac8b872a6bb44f6bfeeb243270b
public/ticket/17979 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:141 jdemeyer]:
> Concerning terminology: is "lexicographic order" really the standard way
of refering to this ordering? I would call it "reverse lexicographic"
because it starts with the ''largest'' element first (but I'm not in
combinatorics, so if this is standard, then it's fine).
Yup, we indeed wanted to be more specific about this. This is done
now. Note that we have used "inverse lexicographic" since "reverse
lexicographic" usually means reading the words in reverse order.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexicographical_order#Reverse_lexicographic_order
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:175>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
