#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers:
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | ad238f9f80726ac8b872a6bb44f6bfeeb243270b
public/ticket/17979 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:41 jdemeyer]:
> Some implementations might not use keyword arguments for `length`, so
the `min_n` and `max_n` arguments (preferably renamed to `min_sum` and
`max_sum`) should be moved towards the end of the argument list.
I'd be rather surprised if this was used anywhere (it was not in the Sage
sources), especially since the documentation never mentionned this
possibility. And it's neat to have all arguments be grouped by theme. But
ok, better be safe than sorry. Done.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:176>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
