#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | 855685a47831a829bd3f9e850da2a5dbcfeaab5a
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by aschilling):
Replying to [comment:371 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:370 aschilling]:
> > The point is that this function would take backward smoothing (using
the slope conditions) into account.
>
> Even then, I don't see why this is incompatible with the "sign" option.
You are probably right with the correct definition of the slopes.
I believe all comments have been taken into account now?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:373>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
