#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | 4ff20b7d6fb8fb7379673318bbaa59203db8c2e4
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:369 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:354 nthiery]:
> > the computation of the area below the envelope for which we won't
> > have this symmetry anymore.
> Why not? It's just the sum of the first `n` values, right?
Mathematically, and up to smoothing, yes. The algorithmic will be
somewhat more involved than this for achieving good complexity, but fair
enough, I guess it can be made to work.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:377>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
