#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_info
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | 2c7019c64047f5f84d89d72fec81a7af483cdc66
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:380 jdemeyer]:
> Since `_upper_envelope` deals with ceiling bounds and refers only to
information which is already contained in `_ceiling`, it looks like
`_upper_envelope` should really be a method of `Envelope` (then better
without the leading underscore). So please justify why you think this
should ''not'' be the case.
I agree that it's better; thanks for the suggestion! Done.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:382>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
