#18289: Revert the changes that #17821 made to graph/
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Volker Braun | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vbraun/graph_preference | 9a8700d91b7096b369ff3927c93d14f169f14b7c
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vbraun):
Replying to [comment:72 ncohen]:
> I am not. `G_{10}` means nothing to somebody in the graph world, and the
previous output was way more informative:
Well do you have any way of using latex to improve on the plain text
output? I just put that there to avoid calling `_latex_()` in SageNB. We
can also return `\verb{Looped multi-graph on 4 vertices}`, though that is
kind of lame.
This is related to why I said on sage-devel that the commandline backend
shouldn't claim to support latex output, printing the latex version just
makes it worse.
> There is no reason to consider `show(a_graph) # opens a window` as a bug
either.
It doesn't do that (or, rather, it only does that in the commandline ui).
Do you really think that the SageNB behavior where show switches from tkz
graphics to matplotlib graphics is a feature?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18289#comment:73>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
