#19586: Add is_cayley_graph
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jaanos             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.10
      Component:  graph theory       |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  Cayley graphs      |    Merged in:
  groups                             |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Janoš Vidali       |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  95dfa64264bb0e6ec9122e5ce458a5000d48bc3d
  u/jaanos/add_is_cayley_graph       |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jaanos):

 Hi!

 Hmm, I would still like to have an `is_cayley` method for graphs. But I
 agree about having a method `transitive_subgroup` for permutation groups.
 Still, I'm a bit worried about cases when we have a large graph with a
 relatively small automorphism group (say, twice the order of the graph) -
 then finding an appropriate subgroup will be fast, but actually returning
 it (so a Sage subgroup can be built) may make a non-negligible
 contribution to the running time (since reading GAP output can be slow).
 So I propose:
 - we have a `transitive_subgroup` method, which by default returns a
 transitive subgroup of given order,
 - `transitive_subgroup` may be explicitly told not to return the group (by
 setting, say, `return_group` to `False`),
 - we add a helper method (say, `_transitive_subgroup_gap`) which returns a
 GAP object containing the subgroup (we could make the result cached, so if
 one first asks whether a graph is Cayley and then wants to know the group,
 it needn't be recomputed).

 This way, `transitive_subgroup` can call the helper function, and then
 avoid actually reading the GAP subgroup if it is told not to return it.

 What do you think?

 Janoš

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19586#comment:29>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to