#9433: Put more files under revision control.
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: distribution | Keywords:
Author: John Palmieri | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by kcrisman):
Those ideas seem reasonable, but probably I'm not the one to make the
call, since I'm not doing the work.
> > - usually that takes a little time, and then it somehow gets added to
the official version at sagemath.org (and a few other places?). The
problem is that this isn't fully automated yet.
>
> I think the release notes as in the announcements are meanwhile fully
automatically generated by a script. I just wonder if these are really
"human"-(means user-)readable, if we intend that.
The hard part is, but at least in theory the "known issues" and "new
features" sections and things like that are supposed to be human-
generated. mvngu used to make great categorized ones, but likely hasn't
had the time lately. I think they are more human-readable than some I've
seen in other programs, though :)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9433#comment:32>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
