#10042: Doctest failure in sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  mpatel           |       Owner:  mvngu     
       Type:  defect           |      Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  blocker          |   Milestone:  sage-4.6  
  Component:  doctest          |    Keywords:            
     Author:                   |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:                   |      Merged:            
Work_issues:  report upstream  |  
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by drkirkby):

 Replying to [comment:38 zimmerma]:
 > > Has anyone had chance to look at this? It is marked as a blocker for
 4.6, so is quite important this is squashed soon.
 >
 > I agree. The problem has been isolated to be a NumPy (or Lapack)
 problem. Thus someone fluent with NumPy and/or Lapack should look at it.
 Apart from William, who is quite busy, can we add someone in cc who knows
 about Numpy and/or Lapack?

 If we could get some more precise details about how it's been isolated, we
 might be able to post to the Numpy list now.

 > Otherwise, a quick-and-dirty workaround is to replace the last digits by
 {{{...}}} in the doctest
 > to allow some numerical error.
 >
 > Paul

 I'm not sure that achieves anything useful. Sure the doctest will pass,
 but it might actually delay the urgency given to fixing the underlying
 problem. A successful test is one that has uncovered a previously unknown
 error. This tests has done that. I don't personally think it's appropriate
 to water down the test just to get 100% passes.

 I suggested some time ago we should have a page on a wiki which documents
 known issues with a release - either before or after the release is made.

 e.g I started this, though it's not been updated

 http://wiki.sagemath.org/errata

 I think it would be better to document the problem rather than temporarily
 hide it.

 Dave

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10042#comment:39>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to