#10042: Doctest failure in sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  mpatel           |       Owner:  mvngu     
       Type:  defect           |      Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  blocker          |   Milestone:  sage-4.6  
  Component:  doctest          |    Keywords:            
     Author:                   |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:                   |      Merged:            
Work_issues:  report upstream  |  
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by leif):

 Replying to [comment:57 dimpase]:
 > The dgeev.f from the canonical place:
 > http://www.netlib.org/lapack/double/dgeev.f
 > does not differ from what we have in lapack spkg.
 > So I doubt that a "more recent version" (well, this one is Fortran VI,
 no joke...)
 > would provide a fix.

 {{{dgeev}}} calls many other modules...

 > It looks to me more of a compiler bug than Lapack bug...

 I was thinking of GCC built-ins, too.

 > I wonder how one can get hold of a non-gcc-based fortran compiler for
 one of platforms we have this issue...

 Sun's Fortran compiler on e.g. t2.math? Perhaps Dave also has an IBM (AIX)
 or HP[-UX] Fortran compiler.

 Btw, on Linux, I have a couple of LAPACK library versions, including "3gf"
 ("gf" for GNU's gfortran).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10042#comment:58>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to