#10042: Doctest failure in sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by dimpase):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:68 dimpase]:
> Replying to [comment:67 mpatel]:
> > I'd still like to resolve this before we release 4.6.
> >
> > Are there any objections to Leif's suggestion to use tagged 32-bit and
64-bit results? Or, if tagging doesn't cover all reported cases, to using
dots (`...`)?
>
> Well, do we agree now that this is a purely doctest problem? (mhansen
(changeset 14950, trac #8054)
> has put too many digits there...)
>
I've just attached the patch that puts the ellipses to the right places,
so that the doctest passes on Macosx 10.5 PPC
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10042#comment:69>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
