#6456: Upgrade cvxopt in sage from 0.9 to 1.1.3
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
   Reporter:  was                                |       Owner:  mabshoff       
                        
       Type:  defect                             |      Status:  needs_info     
                        
   Priority:  major                              |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.1     
                        
  Component:  packages                           |    Keywords:                 
                        
     Author:  Harald Schilly, Dmitrii Pasechnik  |    Upstream:  Completely 
fixed; Fix reported upstream
   Reviewer:                                     |      Merged:                 
                        
Work_issues:  licence                            |  
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------

Comment(by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:111 drkirkby]:
 > Yes, it was me who added the comments - see my comments 3 months ago on
 this ticket.
 >
 > I don't see what the problem is though - Sage includes a lot of code
 licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License - e.g. MPIR recently
 changed to that. Hence my comment this are "Sage compatible". Actually, I
 think someone has changed that, as I doubt I would have started the
 sentence with a lower case 's', but it's a minor point.  I think the
 license issue is a ''non-issue''.
 >
 > I have some recollection that the cvxopt authors were going to
 incorporate my Solaris patch, so given this has ticket has been changed
 from using version 1.1.2 to using 1.1.3, I'm puzzled that does not appear
 to have happened.

 They wanted to look into it, that's all. I guess this has become even more
 irrelevant, as I don't even have a machine where to test this patch any
 more. They are probably in the same position.

 How about we upgrade this now, and then fix remaining issues in TODO in
 new ticket(s)? I need this stuff, and I am sick and tired of extra manual
 labour I need to do in order to use this version of cvxopt....

 Dima

 >
 > I'm more concerned we have made this use GLPK, but to the best of my
 knowledge, there's not a single doc test showing any example of how to use
 GLPK, so we have no idea of that functionality works at all.
 >
 > Dave

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6456#comment:112>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to