#10887: Upgrade scipy to 0.9
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jason | Owner: tbd
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7
Component: packages | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by fbissey):
OK so my big doctest failure will turn out to be Gentoo specific because
we don't have scipy_sandbox and relied on arpack functionality included in
scipy. Arpack is also bundled in scipy so presumably we could switch to
using
{{{
from scipy.sparse.linalg.eigen.arpack import arpack
}}}
instead of
{{{
from arpack import speigs
}}}
there are a few other things to clean afterwards but nothing serious.
The functionality has been shipped in scipy for a while. The other part of
scipy_sandbox (delaunay) can be provided by matplotlib so we could drop
scipy_sandbox altogether but that would be another ticket.
I think this ticket should be merged at the same time or after numpy-1.5.1
(#10792) otherwise scipy will need artificial bumping when numpy is
merged.
I should get on with that spkg, I had forgotten that I didn't make one.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10887#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
