#10887: Upgrade scipy to 0.9
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: jason | Owner: tbd
Type: task | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7
Component: packages | Keywords:
Author: François Bissey | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Rob Beezer | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment(by kcrisman):
> This is the first time I've reviewed an spkg upgrade. Is there more to
be done? If so, feel free to flip this back to "needs work."
In theory, one should check if the spkg is properly formed, by unpacking
it, reading any changes, and making sure that when one `sage -pkg`s it
back up there are no red flags (e.g., unchecked changes).
> François - thanks for putting this together. I'll go look at #10936
now, but I think the `NumPy` upgrade is beyond me right now.
It would be helpful to know if all these upgrades play well together,
though, so that would helpful for finishing this ticket off.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10887#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
