#7377: Symbolic Ring to Maxima via EclObject
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: nbruin
| Owner: nbruin
Type: enhancement
| Status: needs_work
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-feature
Component: symbolics
| Keywords:
Author: Nils Bruin, Jean-Pierre Flori
| Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Jean-Pierre Flori, François Bissey, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Nils
Bruin | Merged:
Work_issues:
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Changes (by jpflori):
* work_issues: loads(dumps()), very minor doctest formatting issues, a
few remaining doctest errors =>
Old description:
> With maxima-as-an-ecl-library and ecl accessible as a library, we can
> start interfacing with maxima via a binary library interface. This should
> be more efficient and more robust, because expressions can be transmitted
> in a much richer format than text and parsing does not have to recognise
> error messages and questions (since communication does not go via
> STDIN/STDOUT anymore).
>
> Applies cleanly to 4.6.2.
>
> This ticket is dependent on #10766, #10773, #10743. Ticket #10818 is
> desirable but not essential. Apply:
>
> {{{
> trac_7377-abstract-maxima_p2.patch
> trac_7377-maximalib_p2.patch
> trac_7377-fastcalculus_p2.patch
> trac_7377-better-ask-error_p2.patch
> trac_7377-split_and_refactor-p2.patch
> trac_7377-lazy-maxlib.p2.patch
> trac_7377-floatcast.patch
> trac_7377-unicode_to_ecl-p1.patch
> trac_7377-assumptions-p2.patch
> trac_7377-doctests.patch
> }}}
> * attachment:trac_7377-abstract-maxima_p2.patch
> * attachment:trac_7377-maximalib_p2.patch
> * attachment:trac_7377-fastcalculus_p2.patch
> * attachment:trac_7377-better-ask-error_p2.patch
> * attachment:trac_7377-split_and_refactor-p2.patch
> * attachment:trac_7377-lazy-maxlib.p2.patch
> * attachment:trac_7377-floatcast.patch
> * attachment:trac_7377-unicode_to_ecl-p1.patch
> * attachment:trac_7377-assumptions-p2.patch
> * attachment:trac_7377-doctests.patch
New description:
With maxima-as-an-ecl-library and ecl accessible as a library, we can
start interfacing with maxima via a binary library interface. This should
be more efficient and more robust, because expressions can be transmitted
in a much richer format than text and parsing does not have to recognise
error messages and questions (since communication does not go via
STDIN/STDOUT anymore).
Applies cleanly to 4.6.2.
This ticket is dependent on #10766, #10773, #10743. Ticket #10818 is
desirable but not essential. Apply:
{{{
trac_7377-abstract-maxima_p2.patch
trac_7377-maximalib_p2.patch
trac_7377-fastcalculus_p2.patch
trac_7377-better-ask-error_p2.patch
trac_7377-split_and_refactor-p2.patch
trac_7377-lazy-maxlib.p2.patch
trac_7377-floatcast.patch
trac_7377-unicode_to_ecl-p1.patch
trac_7377-assumptions-p3.patch
trac_7377-doctests-p1.patch
}}}
* attachment:trac_7377-abstract-maxima_p2.patch
* attachment:trac_7377-maximalib_p2.patch
* attachment:trac_7377-fastcalculus_p2.patch
* attachment:trac_7377-better-ask-error_p2.patch
* attachment:trac_7377-split_and_refactor-p2.patch
* attachment:trac_7377-lazy-maxlib.p2.patch
* attachment:trac_7377-floatcast.patch
* attachment:trac_7377-unicode_to_ecl-p1.patch
* attachment:trac_7377-assumptions-p3.patch
* attachment:trac_7377-doctests-p1.patch
--
Comment:
I uploaded updated versions of both last patches. I accidently deleted two
lines in the previous one which cause the principal error, they are
restored now. I added pickling tests, not sure they make sense. Also some
various fixes and cosmetic changes to reduce line lengths for sphynx and
readibility.
Afterwards "make ptestlong" reported no errors on my computer.
Don't know if someone already took a look at what I did to split Interface
class out of Expect class.
It seems functional now, but maybe I left some mistakes there.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7377#comment:123>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
