#7377: Symbolic Ring to Maxima via EclObject
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: nbruin
| Owner: nbruin
Type: enhancement
| Status: needs_review
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-feature
Component: symbolics
| Keywords:
Author: Nils Bruin, Jean-Pierre Flori
| Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Jean-Pierre Flori, François Bissey, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Nils
Bruin | Merged:
Work_issues:
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment(by kcrisman):
Okay, the HTML docs look fine in general. Good catch on a few of the
indentations that were incorrect before in any case.
{{{
1.
Sage can currently only understand a subset of the output of Maxima,
Maple and Mathematica, so even if the chosen backend can perform
the summation the result might not be convertable into a Sage
expression.
}}}
shouldn't be double-spaced, but this is not really a big deal because it
still looks ok.
More importantly, but still not enough to stop positive review, is the
fact that the new files are not in the documentation! We will need to fix
`interfaces.rst` in the sage/doc/en/ folder to be accurate, as well as to
include the new `sage/interfaces/maxima_lib`,
`sage/interfaces/maxima_abstract`, and `sage/interfaces/interface`
documentation. This is now #10942.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7377#comment:126>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.