#12369: Add a gcc package
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  jdemeyer  |          Owner:  tbd                                  
                                         
       Type:  task      |         Status:  new                                  
                                         
   Priority:  major     |      Milestone:  sage-5.0                             
                                         
  Component:  packages  |       Keywords:                                       
                                         
Work_issues:            |       Upstream:  N/A                                  
                                         
   Reviewer:            |         Author:  Jeroen Demeyer                       
                                         
     Merged:            |   Dependencies:  #11073, #10492, #12366, #12367, 
#12368, #12405, #12416, #12422, #12423, #12425
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------

Comment(by rohana):

 Replying to [comment:19 jhpalmieri]:
 > I've been wondering for a while if we should change Sage to use
 autoconf. (When I say "we", I don't actually mean me, since I don't know
 anything about writing `configure` scripts, nor do I want to learn.) This
 could replace spkg-install (especially with the modifications at #10492
 that create a Makefile on the fly). Does this make sense as an
 enhancement?

 I don't know how much additional functionality it would add, but I would
 argue for it since it is more unix user friendly than our current custom
 setup (SAGE_ATLAS_LIB is not as user friendly as a fairly standard --with-
 system-atlas argument for configure). My guess is that it would be a
 fairly large endeavour to implement a first version of such a change (I
 don't know autoconf, so I'm just guessing here), although it would
 hopefully be easier to maintain than spkg-install.

 > Should I poll sage-devel about it, and then open a ticket if the
 response is positive?

 I don't think it could hurt. Also, that would be a better place to discuss
 it than on this ticket.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12369#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to