#12969: Coercion failures in symmetric functions
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.3
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: symmetric functions, coercion | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by aschilling):
Hi Simon!
Thank you for investigating this. I should mention that Mike Zabrocki and
I just finished a patch in
[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5457] which changes the syntax
for symmetric functions. As far as I know the coercion also breaks in that
set-up.
At the Sage Days in Minneapolis last week, Franco Saliola also told me
that he was hit by the coercion bug in their code on quasisymmetric
functions [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8899]. Franco, could
you post your precise failure?
Anne
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12969#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
