#12969: Coercion failures in symmetric functions
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.3
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: symmetric functions, coercion | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:10 SimonKing]:
> Helas. It is ''not'' the same. Doing the above, one gets an awfully
complicated composition of maps, probably rather inefficient.
Yes that's the well know issue (#8878) of the current coercion model
implementation: it does a depth first search rather than a breath first.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12969#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
