#12969: Coercion failures in symmetric functions
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.3
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: symmetric functions, coercion | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by saliola):
Replying to [comment:14 aschilling]:
> At the Sage Days in Minneapolis last week, Franco Saliola also told me
that he was hit by the coercion bug in their code on quasisymmetric
functions [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8899]. Franco, could
you post your precise failure?
What didn't hit upon the problem with the current code, but with new bases
that we wrote on top of it. These are not going in to Sage as part of
#8899 (we are only implementing the "classical" bases in this first
stage).
Franco
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12969#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
