Hi Austy woah woah.. hold ur horses there bud. u seem to have taken this a little to personally... bear in mind as i have stated before and so aptly put by Yvonnie that I do not want to blame or point fingers.. i want to find a way out of this problem. i requst you to pls read my responces below
> 3. Four (4) N.O.C's were given by the communidade for this stretch > outside the school. The > reason that the kiosk's have reached close to the intersection, is > because Anil threatened > them and told them not to come close. One person's kiosk was > forcibly removed and thrown in > Panchayat compound. Only after the Police threatened strict action, > did Anil & co. bring it back > and put it in place. can't the commuidade take action against him also for something? after all he is only taken an NOC for his small parcel of land NOT the ajoining ones > with others charging money to run small mobile carts etc. The lease > being of temporary > nature for only 11 months, we found it okay and we had decided that > we would review the > same the following year.... i was under the imprssion that it WAS for a permant structure so as to enable them to take an electrical connection. we can clafify this by gogin thru the recods on wednesday shall we? i remeber this being discussed for a meet. > 3. The structure which you say are permanent are in reality (as can be > seen by all) tin and > plastic/partly G.I. angle structures, and can be lifted and moved > whenever necessary. The > Cement used by them is illegal, but explanation given is that it is > done to avoid robbery of > the same and to prevent water damage. isnt that their lookout reallly?? we shd not be allowing any illegalities to take palce under the guise of "explanations" like that even ppl have an "explanation for field filling saying they need a palce to park!!!!. its not a question of satisfinf ppls needs. its a question of whats legal and right and what is not. > 4. I have already said why the kiosk's have come so close to the > intersection. It was clearly > decided that the road widening would not take place any more that > what is being done. Yes.. and if u read my earlier mail, it was also agreed that a footpath was to be made.. so where is the footpath idea gone than? shelved? > This is private land of the communidade and the PWD has to acquire > the land before any > further widening. We however have let it pass as it is in the > interest of the people to have > better roads. how can u just let it pass? a little out of context but shouldnt u still be in a position to demand compensation form the govt? lets be a little pro-active here. > permission or acquiring it to the best of our knowledge. The major > part of the bandhs on both > the sides (which once had two long rows of coconut trees growing > on it) of the road have > been leveled, and now pose danger to the remaining coconut trees, > as their roots have become out of topic but nevertheless sad but true... i was goign to bring up this issue for next communidade meeting. you cannot just sit back and say let it be... as the attorney i think it IS your duty to demand compensation. and maybee we can do some serivice by planting more tress on the remaining part???? > weak and in some cases cut. What road widening more are you > talking of?? *did we not in the* > * new draft regional plan say and propose the road to be left > untouched? * ur not quoting the entire sentence.. the rd widening shd be left untouched *ONLY in areas within the village esp where it would involve brekaing of walls and compound walls. Look at the DRP austy. BOTH the MDR's have a width of 10 meters.. the rd WAS provisions for broadning. > *5. Interest of the village should take priority I agree, but /PLEASE > DO NOT TAKE DECISIONS /* > *// FOR THE ENTIRE VILLAGE based on the thinking of a few. There > are elected bodies in* > * our village who have earned the right to do so. * And we ahve the right to correct these bodies when we feel we ahve erred.. how can u say that i am making decisions? when i fel strongly about something i'm putting forward my suggestion and complaint and IF and ONLY IF it is found to be valid OR illegal OR wrongly planned, than the authoroties will atke proper action on it. what YOU are trying to tell me is that i am making a deciosin and acting on it??? no sir.. what i am doing is ONLY making my voice heard.. is it a crime to do so???? > *Please do come and visit the communidade Ashley, all your queries will > be answered.* > *It would be right to first ask, and only when everything is known, post > the same on the net.* I Did ask you.. i claled you up on sunday from the consumer cell meeting since this issue had raised it head there as well. you agve me the answers which i posted on the list in a mail prior to this one Please understand once again austy.. i'm not against you or the communidade.. i am against faulty planning.. why do u think i came on board with the DRP2021??? NOT everyhting has to be seeen only in the eyes of bussiness. in solidarity regards Ashley -- Failure is not an option -- it comes bundled with Windows. Devine Computers Abreovaddo, Saligao, Bardez, Goa. Ph: 2409544 / 9823118321 Branch: Opp Municipality, Shetye resicom, Shop #3. Bicholim Ph: 9422448900 / 2361147 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ This message comes via the Google Groups "Saligao-Net" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/saligao-net?hl=en Please post regularly to keep the e-village active! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
