Hi David, Thanks for replying.
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:08:12 -0500, David Baelde <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andre, > > That's an interesting and annoying problem. Right now I can't tell > what's happening. I need more information: > > (1) Is there anything "funny" in liquidsoap logs, about reconnection, > "must catchup X seconds"? Liquidsoap gets late if it lacks CPU or the > network lags, but it tells you about it. The logs show nothing untowrad - no reconnections, no catchups, and, according to the meta tag, is playing proeprly and completes. I've written to my IP about it, and there is noting untoward happening server end either. (Actually, he pointed to the other ticket very similar to my problem (his was 'hiccuping . . ') > > (2) In your experiment with two different internet connections, what > do you do exactly? Do you change the location of the liquidsoap > client, the icecast server, both? If the problem also occurs with > liquidsoap and icecast on the same host, that would say a lot... > When ls informed me that the port was taken, I went back to my liq script and commented out the mp3 (shoutcast section) and continued to work with vorbis output alone. However, when I attempted to do both, I found out there was a problem not only with the port, but that sc_serv was non-functioning. After that was corrected (yesterday) it still refuses to recognize the port, so I dumped shoutcast for the time being. The problem occurs with liquidsoap and icecast on the same host. > (3) When you listen to the stream, does it sound okay, not double speed? The stream sounds great - no double speed - it plays for 17 seconds, pauses 7 seconds, resumes for anotehr 17 seconds, . . . Thanks, Andre > > Cheers, -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
