At 11:11 AM -0400 8/24/08, Paco Hope wrote: > Clearly the survey's content is only of interest if the HTML validates.
The publisher of the web page is not in the security business, they are in the publishing business. But how can I respect their publishing expertise if they fail a simple automatic test. And how can their target audience of security folk, who depend strongly on following standards respect the knowledge of a publisher who does not follow publishing standards. > On Aug 24, 2008, at 9:47 AM, "ljknews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> At 2:43 PM -0400 8/22/08, Gary McGraw wrote: >> >>> BankInfoSecurity is running a survey on software security that some >>> of you may be interested in participating in. Try it yourself here: >>> >>> http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/surveys.php?surveyID=1 >> >> Hmmm. http://validator.w3.org says there are 973 errors on that page. -- Larry Kilgallen _______________________________________________ Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com) as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community. _______________________________________________
