At 7:21 PM -0400 8/24/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> The publisher of the web page is not in the security business, >> they are in the publishing business. But how can I respect >> their publishing expertise if they fail a simple automatic >> test. > > Well, I guess that most of web developers are not validating with > tools such as w3 validators, but more interesting, validating with > different browsers...
My experience is that browsers succeed on standards-compliant pages. Standard compliance should be the first test. If it subsequently fails on a particular browser, it is a browser defect which may or may not be of interest to the publisher. -- Larry Kilgallen _______________________________________________ Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com) as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community. _______________________________________________
