Hi!
Just worked on smybolic NAGs today and rechecked if to use
ASCII or UTF. For some reasons I'd actually prefer UTF chars
(they need much less space in the annotations e.g.) and I'd
come up with the list below.
Suggestions for improvement? Should chars change? There're
also a bunch of NAGs lacking form this list. If you have
them as UTF please feel free to send them to me.
Additionally, what do you think would be a good GUI solution
to enter these NAGs? At the moment I allow for some keyboard
entry of say □ just as [] and so on (I could give a
transcription of this) but I think some graphical
representation to select from is needed. However, they are
many... Note also: some show up the same for black as for
white though internally they are stored as different values.
If you take e.g. $24 for white's space advantage it looks
the same as $25. But internally they are different!
"", // 0 null annotation
"!", // $1 1 good move (traditional "!")
"?", // $2 2 poor move (traditional "?")
"!!", // $3 3 very good move (traditional "!!")
"??", // $4 4 very poor move (traditional "??")
"!?", // $5 5 speculative move (traditional "!?")
"?!", // $6 6 questionable move (traditional "?!")
"forced", // $7 7 forced move (all others lose quickly)
"□", // $8 8 singular move (no reasonable alternatives)
"worst", // $9 9 worst move
"=", // $10 10 drawish position
"=, quiet", // $11 11 equal chances, quiet position (DR:
traditional =)
"↹", // $12 12 equal chances, active position (DR: ECO ->/<-)
"~", // $13 13 unclear position (DR: emerging &)
"+=", // $14 14 White has a slight advantage (DR: +=)
"=+", // $15 15 Black has a slight advantage (DR: =+)
"+/-", // $16 16 White has a moderate advantage (DR: +/-)
"-/+", // $17 17 Black has a moderate advantage (DR: -/+)
"+-", // $18 18 White has a decisive advantage (DR: +-)
"-+", // $19 19 Black has a decisive advantage (DR: -+)
"+--", // $20 20 White has a crushing advantage (Black
should resign) (DR: +--)
"--+", // $21 21 Black has a crushing advantage (White
should resign) (DR: --+)
"⊙", // $22 22 White is in zugzwang (DR: zz)
"⊙", // $23 23 Black is in zugzwang (DR: zz)
"◯", // $24 24 White has a slight space advantage
"◯", // $25 25 Black has a slight space advantage
"◯◯", // $26 26 White has a moderate space advantage (DR: O)
"◯◯", // $27 27 Black has a moderate space advantage (DR: O)
"◯◯◯", // $28 28 White has a decisive space advantage
"◯◯◯", // $29 29 Black has a decisive space advantage
"↻", // $30 30 White has a slight time (development) advantage
"↺", // $31 31 Black has a slight time (development) advantage
"↻↻", // $32 32 White has a moderate time (development)
advantage (DR: @)
"↺↺", // $33 33 Black has a moderate time (development)
advantage (DR: @)
"↻↻↻", // $34 34 White has a decisive time (development)
advantage
"↺↺↺", // $35 35 Black has a decisive time (development)
advantage
"↑", // $36 36 White has the initiative (DR: ^)
"↓", // $37 37 Black has the initiative (DR: ^)
"⇑", // $38 38 White has a lasting initiative
"⇓", // $39 39 Black has a lasting initiative
"→", // $40 40 White has the attack (DR: ->)
"←", // $41 41 Black has the attack (DR: ->)
"&/-", // $42 42 White has insufficient compensation for
material deficit
"&/+", // $43 43 Black has insufficient compensation for
material deficit
"=/&", // $44 44 White has sufficient compensation for
material deficit (DR: =/&)
"=/&", // $45 45 Black has sufficient compensation for
material deficit (DR: =/&)
"+/&", // $46 46 White has more than adequate compensation
for material deficit
"-/&", // $47 47 Black has more than adequate compensation
for material deficit
"⊞", // $48 48 White has a slight center control advantage
"⊞", // $49 49 Black has a slight center control advantage
"⊞⊞", // $50 50 White has a moderate center control
advantage (DR: #)
"⊞⊞", // $51 51 Black has a moderate center control
advantage (DR: #)
"⊞⊞⊞", // $52 52 White has a decisive center control advantage
"⊞⊞⊞", // $53 53 Black has a decisive center control advantage
"⟩", // $54 54 White has a slight kingside control advantage
"⟩", // $55 55 Black has a slight kingside control advantage
"⟫", // $56 56 White has a moderate kingside control
advantage (DR: >>)
"⟫", // $57 57 Black has a moderate kingside control
advantage (DR: >>)
"⋙", // $58 58 White has a decisive kingside control advantage
"⋙", // $59 59 Black has a decisive kingside control advantage
"⟨", // $60 60 White has a slight queenside control advantage
"⟨", // $61 61 Black has a slight queenside control advantage
"⟪", // $62 62 White has a moderate queenside control
advantage (DR: <<)
"⟪", // $63 63 Black has a moderate queenside control
advantage (DR: <<)
"⋘", // $64 64 White has a decisive queenside control
advantage
"⋘", // $65 65 Black has a decisive queenside control
advantage
"↗", // $92 92 White has good bishop placement (DR:
diagonal //)
"↖", // $93 93 Black has good bishop placement
"⇈", // $96 96 White has good rook placement (DR: rank <=>
file ||)
"⇊", // $97 97 Black has good rook placement
"⇄", // $130 130 White has slight counterplay
"⇆", // $131 131 Black has slight counterplay
"⇄⇄", // $132 132 White has moderate counterplay (DR: ->/<-)
"⇆⇆", // $133 133 Black has moderate counterplay
"⇄⇄⇄", // $134 134 White has decisive counterplay
"⇆⇆⇆", // $135 135 Black has decisive counterplay
"⊕", // $136 136 White has moderate time control pressure
"⊖", // $137 137 Black has moderate time control pressure
"⊕⊕", // $138 138 White has severe time control pressure
"⊖⊖", // $139 139 Black has severe time control pressure
"△", // $140 with the idea of
"⌓", // $142 better is
"R", // $144 various moves
"RR", // $145 editorial comment
"N", // $146 Novelty
"×", // $147 weak square
"⊥", // $148 endgame
"⟺", // $149 file
"⇗", // $150 diagonal
"◫", // $151 bishop pair
"◨", // $153 opposite coloured bishops
"⊶", // $154 bishops of the same colour
"ǁ", // $190 etc.
"⡁", // $191 doubled pawn
"⚯", // $192 spearated pawn
"⚮", // $193 connected pawn
"D", // $201 Diagram
"—", // $210 see
"#", // $211 mate
"⚨", // $212 passed pawn
"⌊", // $214 with
"⌋", // $215 without
--
Kind regards, / War is Peace.
| Freedom is Slavery.
Alexander Wagner | Ignorance is Strength.
|
| Theory : G. Orwell, "1984"
/ In practice: USA, since 2001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
