Milan Jurik writes: > Because many modules in ON (and not only in ON) are in one file, it's > usefull in many cases.
As many or more are not. > Yes, it's not reliable but it's better than > nothing. So, if we are removing %I%, we should find some better, generic > mechanism for it. It sounds like we're in violent agreement that something better is needed. The disagreement seems to be that you feel that %I% is sufficient in some cases, particularly ones that are interesting to you (;-}), while others of us feel that it never was a good answer. Rather than repeating past blunders, I'd like to see us do better. In any event, you can always replicate these past mistakes on your own by typing "v1.1" explicitly in your code, and bumping the number on each push. I don't think that's the right strategy at all, and I'd strongly argue against it being applied as any sort of guideline or standard for others to follow, but if it floats your boat, and you can't wait for a better answer, go for it. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
