On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 03:30:01PM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote: > Milan Jurik wrote: > > I could hack it to the module by some Makefile, but it will change > > revision in every build, not good for new packaging system I think. > > It seems to me that the simplest solution here is to have at least the > .SUNW_signature section in a kernel crash dump and in a userland core > file. That means no new build process and it works for all > consolidations that have their binaries signed and any 3rd party code > that is also signed. See 6365439 which I logged on 2005-12-20. >
I agree that having the signatures available might be good, we do already have this information with ::showrev -v, right? And it's perfectly usable? Out of curiosity, do the signatures have the same version information that the CTF data does? Cheers, - jonathan > -- > Darren J Moffat > _______________________________________________ > tools-discuss mailing list > tools-discuss at opensolaris.org
