Milan Jurik wrote: > Darren, > > V ?t, 08. 07. 2008 v 16:30, Darren J Moffat p??e: >> Milan Jurik wrote: >>> I could hack it to the module by some Makefile, but it will change >>> revision in every build, not good for new packaging system I think. >> It seems to me that the simplest solution here is to have at least the >> .SUNW_signature section in a kernel crash dump and in a userland core >> file. That means no new build process and it works for all >> consolidations that have their binaries signed and any 3rd party code >> that is also signed. See 6365439 which I logged on 2005-12-20. >> > > This will help a lot in such cases, I agree.
Then please add lots of SRs to it so that it gets attention and might actually get implemented. -- Darren J Moffat
