James Carlson wrote: > Rather than repeating past blunders, I'd like to see us do better. In > any event, you can always replicate these past mistakes on your own by > typing "v1.1" explicitly in your code, and bumping the number on each > push. I don't think that's the right strategy at all, and I'd > strongly argue against it being applied as any sort of guideline or > standard for others to follow, but if it floats your boat, and you > can't wait for a better answer, go for it.
Providing the code isn't in ON! -- Darren J Moffat
