Darren, V ?t, 08. 07. 2008 v 16:30, Darren J Moffat p??e: > Milan Jurik wrote: > > I could hack it to the module by some Makefile, but it will change > > revision in every build, not good for new packaging system I think. > > It seems to me that the simplest solution here is to have at least the > .SUNW_signature section in a kernel crash dump and in a userland core > file. That means no new build process and it works for all > consolidations that have their binaries signed and any 3rd party code > that is also signed. See 6365439 which I logged on 2005-12-20. >
This will help a lot in such cases, I agree. Best regards, Milan
