David A McClain wrote:
> Re AT&T's bundles.
>
> I got just phone and DSL - and I only got the phone for the DSL - but  
> boy were they persistent with pushing their U-Verse wotnot.
>
>
> On Aug 20, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Patrick Crowley wrote:
>
>   
>>> Unfortunately San Diego has very little competition and usually you
>>> will notice a local monopoly.
>>> Where I live we basically have the choice between TimeWarner and
>>> AT&T (new to the area but they seem to only sell bundled packages
>>> and I don't need TV/Phone either).
>>>       
>> Depending on your location, there are additional options:
>>
>> [  ] Cox Cable - 30mbps for $60/mnth. Quick install. Great uptime. Has
>> worked well for me.
>>
>> [  ] Verizon Fios - 100mbps for ???. Awesome... but only in a few
>> North County 'hoods right now.
>>
>> -- Patrick
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
> >
>   
I've been wondering about U-verse.  They have not gotten around to 
laying the required fiber in RB, but I am interested.  Does anyone know 
of the picture/service quality vs DirecTv?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
SD Ruby mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to