No one here uses Radrails eh? On 2/19/07, Randy Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Re: having textmate AND shell open. TM will show you the code for editing, the shell is an ongoing output of the app as it is running. Many times in the demos you see of TM, the user is bouncing back and forth to check out the output of the app (the log file basically) and then back to the code to tweak a bit more. -=randy -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Henning Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 6:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Sdruby] OT: what's so great about TextMate? So Rails/Ruby people apparently love TextMate. Why? Why is it better than, say, vim/Emacs? Before TextMate, there was BBEdit, there's Xcode, there are Mac ports of vim and Emacs, etc. How, then, does TextMate fill a void? Normally, the UI in programmer tools suck because the users don't care and making a great UI is a ton of work. Why are TM users fussy about the overall feeling of using their editor? Apparently TextMate has functionality for integrating with the command line, akin to Emacs' shell mode (which I have become incredibly dependent on). Yet in the screencasts I've seen of TM users -- e.g., TurboGears, Rails, etc. -- they have a Mac OS X terminal open and switch between TM and their shell. Why? Warren _______________________________________________ Sdruby mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sdruby.com/mailman/listinfo/sdruby __________ NOD32 2070 (20070219) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com _______________________________________________ Sdruby mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sdruby.com/mailman/listinfo/sdruby
_______________________________________________ Sdruby mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sdruby.com/mailman/listinfo/sdruby
