[Bug 2080949] Re: lubuntu oracular 6.11 kernel; 1 display 'cannot display' & unusable on LIVE
I'm switching this bug report to INCOMPLETE... I re-installed on 780, and no issues experienced now. https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/454/builds/313490/testcases/1802/results ( I'll continue to watch for this though ... maybe the cable was hit during cleaning or something, thus issue is not software related.. I don't believe that though; but I've had a few retries now and have not re-created issue (when I re-created it 4 times on initial day???) ) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080949 Title: lubuntu oracular 6.11 kernel; 1 display 'cannot display' & unusable on LIVE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2080949/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2081274] [NEW] lubuntu oracular (24.10) calamares says 24.04
Public bug reported: This could be a duplicate, but the other bug report I've tagged replaces to reporting 24.04 AFTER install ** to re-crate - boot lubuntu oracular daily - start installer ** expected results Lubuntu 24.10 Oracular Oriole on calamares-graphics ** actual results Lubuntu 24.04 Noble Numbat appears ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.10 Package: calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.10.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.11.0-7.7-generic 6.11.0-rc7 Uname: Linux 6.11.0-7-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.30.0-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.502 CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Fri Sep 20 08:06:20 2024 LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.10 "Oracular Oriole" - Beta amd64 (20240918) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: calamares-settings-ubuntu UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug iso-testing oracular ** Attachment added: "lubuntu_calamares_24.10.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081274/+attachment/5819699/+files/lubuntu_calamares_24.10.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081274 Title: lubuntu oracular (24.10) calamares says 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2081274/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080935] Re: lubuntu oracular calamares - replace partition with %1
Just an FYI... But I mention it happening on d780 which contains a debian and three lubuntu releases; none of which are encrypted... Whilst dc7700 originally filed against is used for all types of installs, thus encrypted is possible there... I believe I was doing a REPLACE PARTITION install at the time it was first noticed; thus encryption would not have been involved as we're using full-disk encryption This issue is PETTY, and can (in my opinion) be - ignored, - or just documented (on discourse if we don't want to mess up release notes as very trivial). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080935 Title: lubuntu oracular calamares - replace partition with %1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2080935/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080949] Re: lubuntu oracular 6.11 kernel; 1 display 'cannot display' & unusable on LIVE
Two ports are used on box DVI port cable (goes to acer 16:10 monitor) HDMI port cable (goes to dell monitor; one displaying the "Optimum resolution 1280x1024 60Hz" mentioned in initial report, as that is an old 4:3 monitor) I am NOT using VGA, but I do have different ports being used (DVI & HDMI on box). Do note: The HDMI cable is HDMI connector on computer end, but is DVI on the monitor-end of the cable; both my monitors are using DVI connectors (both monitors too old for HDMI) --- In working out which cable went to each monitor I booted installed system and paused it at grub, i disconnected the HDMI (to see which display went dark), then re-inserted cable and reboot into live media today the lubuntu 20240916 LIVE media displayed on both monitors?? exited rebooted to grub (debian testing/sid owns grub on box) & selected lubuntu oracular (installed system mentioned in report) and system booted up with both displays working (sddm & lubuntu session) ?? Only changes being - different day - both ACER & DELL monitors were turned off & turned back on (hoping it'd tell me which cable was being used; as monitors are connected to two boxes & set to auto) - HDMI cable unplugged from box; delay (checking which monitor went dark) & reconnect cable YET i can't re-create what I did on original bug report??? Again on - dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 5000/6000/7350/8350) I'm tempted to mark this bug as incomplete given today's testing.. but I'll re-test when I can. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080949 Title: lubuntu oracular 6.11 kernel; 1 display 'cannot display' & unusable on LIVE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2080949/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080949] Re: lubuntu oracular 6.11 kernel; 1 display 'cannot display' & unusable on LIVE
** Description changed: Lubuntu oracular live; first daily using 6.11 kernel on this box which I think is the key difference. On boot (this is second boot of this ISO) I get on one display a message - 1: Auto Detect (DIgital Input) + 1: Auto Detect (Digital Input) Cannot Display This Video Model Optimum resolution 1280x1024 60Hz - and not any image... I expect display to be useable. - + and display was not usable. The other display works... ** Expected results I can use both displays; like I did earlier today OR do if I boot - installed systems (Ubuntu noble, oracular, jammy, Debian testing) + installed systems (Ubuntu noble, oracular [6.8], jammy, Debian testing) ** Actual results I'm limited to one display only; second shows a message & my LXQt.Monitor.Settings won't let me use the display.. ** Other thoughts - booting this ISO in live mode & using `lshw -C video`, and comparing with installed systems I don't see any differences; I can save & append the results if helpful (I didn't save them & was relying on my bad.memory.. so not conclusive) - I have no issues on NOBLE, JAMMY installs; and hadn't noticed any on - ORACULAR install either; but I knew it was still on 6.8 kernel... + ORACULAR install either; but installed system was still on 6.8 kernel... I booted the INSTALLED ORACULAR; applied `apt update; apt full-upgrade`, - when done rebooted and NO ISSUE THERE EITHER??? + when done rebooted and IT HAD THE SAME ISSUE as this live system - so WHAT IS DIFFERENT when RUN LIVE; re-try LIVE & same issue... - - - This is the first time I've experienced this, first ISO, so I'm happy to ignore it... + This is the first time I've experienced this. This video card is OLD!! and I'm suspicious issue is this real old video car AND newer kernel; not Ubuntu specific issue; but bug report allows tracking into future (subsequent ISOs etc) + + Users with old hardware like this can still use Ubuntu 24.04 LTS and use + the GA kernel stack??.. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.10 Package: linux-image-6.11.0-7-generic 6.11.0-7.7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.11.0-7.7-generic 6.11.0-rc7 Uname: Linux 6.11.0-7-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.30.0-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: - USERPID ACCESS COMMAND - /dev/snd/seq:lubuntu1857 F pipewire - /dev/snd/controlC1: lubuntu1860 F wireplumber - /dev/snd/controlC0: lubuntu1860 F wireplumber + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/seq:lubuntu1857 F pipewire + /dev/snd/controlC1: lubuntu1860 F wireplumber + /dev/snd/controlC0: lubuntu1860 F wireplumber CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.502 CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Tue Sep 17 11:15:18 2024 IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iwconfig' LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.10 "Oracular Oriole" - Daily amd64 (20240916) MachineType: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 780 ProcFB: 0 radeondrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz --- quiet splash RelatedPackageVersions: - linux-restricted-modules-6.11.0-7-generic N/A - linux-backports-modules-6.11.0-7-generic N/A - linux-firmware20240913.gita34e7a5f-0ubuntu2 + linux-restricted-modules-6.11.0-7-generic N/A + linux-backports-modules-6.11.0-7-generic N/A + linux-firmware20240913.gita34e7a5f-0ubuntu2 RfKill: - 0: hci0: Bluetooth - Soft blocked: yes - Hard blocked: no + 0: hci0: Bluetooth + Soft blocked: yes + Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 02/13/2010 dmi.bios.release: 3.0 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A03 dmi.board.name: 0200DY dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.board.version: A00 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA03:bd02/13/2010:br3.0:svnDellInc.:pnOptiPlex780:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0200DY:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct3:cvr:sku: dmi.product.name: OptiPlex 780 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080949 Title: lubuntu oracular 6.11 kernel; 1 display 'cannot display' & unusable on LIVE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2080949/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080949] Re: lubuntu oracular 6.11 kernel; 1 display 'cannot display' & unusable on LIVE
If this issue only impacts LIVE (which my testing [minimal as it is] thus far appears to indicate), this is a PETTY ISSUE, as the primary purpose of a Ubuntu ISO is to install the system.. and my older 'oracular' install when booted with 6.11 appeared to work normally... I'll (maybe) know more when I next re-install to this box -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080949 Title: lubuntu oracular 6.11 kernel; 1 display 'cannot display' & unusable on LIVE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2080949/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080949] [NEW] lubuntu oracular 6.11 kernel; 1 display 'cannot display' & unusable on LIVE
Public bug reported: Lubuntu oracular live; first daily using 6.11 kernel on this box which I think is the key difference. On boot (this is second boot of this ISO) I get on one display a message 1: Auto Detect (DIgital Input) Cannot Display This Video Model Optimum resolution 1280x1024 60Hz and not any image... I expect display to be useable. The other display works... ** Expected results I can use both displays; like I did earlier today OR do if I boot installed systems (Ubuntu noble, oracular, jammy, Debian testing) ** Actual results I'm limited to one display only; second shows a message & my LXQt.Monitor.Settings won't let me use the display.. ** Other thoughts - booting this ISO in live mode & using `lshw -C video`, and comparing with installed systems I don't see any differences; I can save & append the results if helpful (I didn't save them & was relying on my bad.memory.. so not conclusive) - I have no issues on NOBLE, JAMMY installs; and hadn't noticed any on ORACULAR install either; but I knew it was still on 6.8 kernel... I booted the INSTALLED ORACULAR; applied `apt update; apt full-upgrade`, when done rebooted and NO ISSUE THERE EITHER??? so WHAT IS DIFFERENT when RUN LIVE; re-try LIVE & same issue... This is the first time I've experienced this, first ISO, so I'm happy to ignore it... This video card is OLD!! and I'm suspicious issue is this real old video car AND newer kernel; not Ubuntu specific issue; but bug report allows tracking into future (subsequent ISOs etc) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.10 Package: linux-image-6.11.0-7-generic 6.11.0-7.7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.11.0-7.7-generic 6.11.0-rc7 Uname: Linux 6.11.0-7-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.30.0-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/seq:lubuntu1857 F pipewire /dev/snd/controlC1: lubuntu1860 F wireplumber /dev/snd/controlC0: lubuntu1860 F wireplumber CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.502 CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Tue Sep 17 11:15:18 2024 IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iwconfig' LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.10 "Oracular Oriole" - Daily amd64 (20240916) MachineType: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 780 ProcFB: 0 radeondrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz --- quiet splash RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-6.11.0-7-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-6.11.0-7-generic N/A linux-firmware20240913.gita34e7a5f-0ubuntu2 RfKill: 0: hci0: Bluetooth Soft blocked: yes Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 02/13/2010 dmi.bios.release: 3.0 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A03 dmi.board.name: 0200DY dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.board.version: A00 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA03:bd02/13/2010:br3.0:svnDellInc.:pnOptiPlex780:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0200DY:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct3:cvr:sku: dmi.product.name: OptiPlex 780 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080949 Title: lubuntu oracular 6.11 kernel; 1 display 'cannot display' & unusable on LIVE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2080949/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080935] Re: lubuntu oracular calamares - replace partition with %1
I get the same on - dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 5000/6000/7350/8350) another BIOS box, but I also note the installer (calamares) says 24.04 noble ??? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080935 Title: lubuntu oracular calamares - replace partition with %1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2080935/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080935] [NEW] lubuntu oracular calamares - replace partition with %1
Public bug reported: Lubuntu oracular install (to dc7700) Types of install are - Install Alongside, Replace a partition, Erase disk, Manual partitioning.. The description text for "Replace a partition" is "Replaces a partition with %1." The %1 being the issue, whatever was supposed to replace it didn't work; typo? format? This appears when booted LIVE or installer run by selecting INSTALL at lubuntu-installer-prompt ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.10 Package: calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.10.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.11.0-7.7-generic 6.11.0-rc7 Uname: Linux 6.11.0-7-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.30.0-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.502 CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Tue Sep 17 18:59:50 2024 LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.10 "Oracular Oriole" - Daily amd64 (20240916) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: calamares-settings-ubuntu UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oracular ** Attachment added: "replace_%1_screen.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080935/+attachment/5818471/+files/replace_%251_screen.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080935 Title: lubuntu oracular calamares - replace partition with %1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2080935/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2045072] Re: [Samsung Galaxy Book2 750XED] Screen goes black
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. Ubuntu 23.10 (mantic) reached end-of-life on July 11, 2024. See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested in discussing it anymore. But if you are then please upgrade to the latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling us which new version it is in. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045072 Title: [Samsung Galaxy Book2 750XED] Screen goes black To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078895] Re: Upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04.1 not offered anymore
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. If people are interested; I'll provide https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- release/2024-September/006225.html For now I also suggest waiting as Moshe/mcaspi12 suggested. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078895 Title: Upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04.1 not offered anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2078895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078008] Re: Clicking the redshift-qt icon in the system tray results in Redshift terminating with exit code 1
> Isn't the timezone supposed to be basically autodetected when the ISO starts though? I would like to think so, alas not always. On occasion if I boot system & start a 'live' system and then start install - in most cases I'm told I'm with a 50-200km of home (commonly on the other side of my city of Melbourne; but my city at least) - about 1 in 10 its Subiaco WA/AU (2727km/1694mile away) or importantly a different timezone (3 hours behind); my ISP's headquarters are at this location - ~equal with Subiaco is New York NY/US (calamares default for unknown). If location isn't detected, redshift results (reddening/no-change) may NOT BE WHAT is expected even when its working 100% These results happen with all Ubuntu and non-Ubuntu ISOs so we can't do anything about it I suspect. I'd hope not all users experience what I do, but I also suspect others experience far worse than here in downunder. The error message is what I saw bug report about though. (I just booted the Lubuntu 24.04.1 ISO on box to my left; it correctly detects me as in Melbourne AU as expected) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078008 Title: Clicking the redshift-qt icon in the system tray results in Redshift terminating with exit code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/redshift-qt/+bug/2078008/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055388] Re: suspected memory leak with indicator-keyboard (causing gnome-session-flashback to freeze after startup)
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2055388 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055388 Title: suspected memory leak with indicator-keyboard (causing gnome-session- flashback to freeze after startup) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-keyboard/+bug/2055388/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078338] [NEW] ubuntu unity 24.04.1 LTS RC boot reports itself as Ubuntu 24.04 (no mention of unity)
Public bug reported: On some hardware, the graphic plymouth isn't used (where Ubuntu Unity has a graphic in package form), but on boxes such as this one, the system boots reporting itself as Ubuntu 24.04 LTS instead... ** Expected outcome System reports as Ubuntu Unity 24.04 LTS during boot ** Actual outcome Plymouth dialog says Ubuntu 24.04 LTS during boot ** Notes Petty issue, but appears to be a package/seed issue; graphic plymouth only as manifest contains the ubuntu 24.04 text only. Manifest file ( https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-unity/noble/daily- live/current/noble-desktop-amd64.manifest ) contains packages plymouth24.004.60-1ubuntu7 plymouth-label 24.004.60-1ubuntu7 plymouth-theme-spinner 24.004.60-1ubuntu7 plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text 24.004.60-1ubuntu7 plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity 22.10 As the hardware isn't using the graphic plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity the Ubuntu text version plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text is used which doesn't mention Ubuntu Unity. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity 22.10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-41.41-generic 6.8.12 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-41-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.498 CurrentDesktop: Unity:Unity7:ubuntu Date: Thu Aug 29 11:13:50 2024 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-Unity 24.04.1 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20240827) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble ** Description changed: On some hardware, the graphic plymouth isn't used (where Ubuntu Unity - has a graphic in package), but on boxes such as this one, the system - boots as Ubuntu 24.04 LTS instead... + has a graphic in package form), but on boxes such as this one, the + system boots reporting itself as Ubuntu 24.04 LTS instead... ** Expected outcome - System reports as Ubuntu Unity 24.04 LTS + System reports as Ubuntu Unity 24.04 LTS during boot ** Actual outcome - Plymouth dialog says Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - + Plymouth dialog says Ubuntu 24.04 LTS during boot ** Notes Petty issue, but appears to be a package/seed issue; graphic plymouth only as manifest contains the ubuntu 24.04 text only. + + Manifest file ( https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-unity/noble/daily- + live/current/noble-desktop-amd64.manifest ) contains packages + + plymouth 24.004.60-1ubuntu7 + plymouth-label24.004.60-1ubuntu7 + plymouth-theme-spinner24.004.60-1ubuntu7 + plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text24.004.60-1ubuntu7 + plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity 22.10 + + As the hardware isn't using the graphic plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity + the Ubuntu text version plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text is used which doesn't + mention Ubuntu Unity. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity 22.10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-41.41-generic 6.8.12 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-41-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.498 CurrentDesktop: Unity:Unity7:ubuntu Date: Thu Aug 29 11:13:50 2024 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-Unity 24.04.1 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20240827) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078338 Title: ubuntu unity 24.04.1 LTS RC boot reports itself as Ubuntu 24.04 (no mention of unity) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity/+bug/2078338/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078008] Re: Clicking the redshift-qt icon in the system tray results in Redshift terminating with exit code 1
this has been mentioned before I believe (sorry I forget specifics) and also expected result will depend on a lot of conditions... HOWEVER YEAH ERROR ain't great ! eg. if it's daytime locally; I don't expect to notice any effect if I start redshift on a system (with timezone setup correctly).. though if nightime then yes it'll redden... (I'm also using various desktops & releases, which maybe skew my memory.. this box currently doesn't have redshift running; starting it at terminal gives guiverc@d7050-next:~$ redshift-qt "Solar elevations: day above 3.0, night below -6.0" "Temperatures: 6500K at day, 3700K at night" "Brightness: 1.00:1.00" "Gamma (Daytime): 1.000, 1.000, 1.000" "Gamma (Night): 0.700, 0.700, 0.700" "Location: 37.80 S, 144.90 E" "Color temperature: 6500K" "Brightness: 1.00" "Status: Enabled" "Period: Daytime" no visual effects visible can be expected (maybe not what users expect though; but its a consequence of day).. the location details ^ I bet though come from a config file for me though (~/.config/redshift.conf).. also for record I'm currently using gnome (if using lxqt redshift autostarts!) but I'd expect identical if/when using a lubuntu session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078008 Title: Clicking the redshift-qt icon in the system tray results in Redshift terminating with exit code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/redshift-qt/+bug/2078008/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078020] Re: lubuntu 24.04.1 RC install ; unable to complete testcase
I booted current daily on - samsung 700t1c-p10aat (i5-3317u, 4gb, 3rd gen.core.intel.graphics.4000) and whilst it offered various (neighbor) wifi connections; it did not show my own (silent), so I'd not have been able to complete testcase on this device either this is another wifi only device; but options available in lubuntu- installer-prompt are device specific; and hidden-ssid networks appear not to be offered in selection. Testcase could be modified to say some devices, or those with hidden- ssid's may need to start session first; connect to wifi then start calamares. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078020 Title: lubuntu 24.04.1 RC install ; unable to complete testcase To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-installer-prompt/+bug/2078020/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078020] Re: lubuntu 24.04.1 RC install ; unable to coplete testcase
** Description changed: - i'll add more when at a real keyboard + this bug could be with TESTCASE itself & not what I've filed against. Install attempted on + - sony vaio ultrabook svp11216cgb (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT) - this bug is petty (failure requires bug report) and because of wifi- - only device and QA testcase + The 1811 + (https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/450/builds/311610/testcases/1811/results/) + testcase requires me to use lubuntu-installer-prompt to connect to + wifi.. HOWEVER I had no such option on this wifi-only device.. I had no + options in drop-down; nothing I could select. + + I can connect to wifi correctly (thus was filed using ubuntu-bug on + device) but only after LIVE session was connected and I can use nm- + tray.. however I had no such option available at lubuntu-installer- + prompt as mandated by install QA testcase). + + Of note, when I start `nm-tray` on the live session and open up dialog, + no options exist there either.. I need to click + add add... thus what + I see in lubuntu-installer-prompt doesn't worry me... + + If it wasn't for testcase; I'd just connect to wifi using nm-tray + (adding wifi device) & then start calamares to install. + + Importance of this bug is ~null (its petty). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: lubuntu-installer-prompt 24.04.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-41.41-generic 6.8.12 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-41-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.498 CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Wed Aug 28 03:47:14 2024 LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04.1 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20240827) SourcePackage: lubuntu-installer-prompt UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Description changed: this bug could be with TESTCASE itself & not what I've filed against. Install attempted on - sony vaio ultrabook svp11216cgb (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT) The 1811 (https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/450/builds/311610/testcases/1811/results/) testcase requires me to use lubuntu-installer-prompt to connect to wifi.. HOWEVER I had no such option on this wifi-only device.. I had no options in drop-down; nothing I could select. I can connect to wifi correctly (thus was filed using ubuntu-bug on - device) but only after LIVE session was connected and I can use nm- - tray.. however I had no such option available at lubuntu-installer- + device) but only after LIVE session was fully-running and I can thus use + nm-tray.. however I had no such option available at lubuntu-installer- prompt as mandated by install QA testcase). - Of note, when I start `nm-tray` on the live session and open up dialog, - no options exist there either.. I need to click + add add... thus what - I see in lubuntu-installer-prompt doesn't worry me... + Of note, when I start `nm-tray` on the [fully-running] live session and + open up dialog, no device options exist there either.. I need to click + '+' to ADD... thus what I see in lubuntu-installer-prompt doesn't worry + (surprise) me... If it wasn't for testcase; I'd just connect to wifi using nm-tray (adding wifi device) & then start calamares to install. Importance of this bug is ~null (its petty). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: lubuntu-installer-prompt 24.04.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-41.41-generic 6.8.12 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-41-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.498 CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Wed Aug 28 03:47:14 2024 LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04.1 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20240827) SourcePackage: lubuntu-installer-prompt UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Summary changed: - lubuntu 24.04.1 RC install ; unable to coplete testcase + lubuntu 24.04.1 RC install ; unable to complete testcase -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078020 Title: lubuntu 24.04.1 RC install ; unable to complete testcase To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-installer-prompt/+bug/2078020/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078020] [NEW] lubuntu 24.04.1 RC install ; unable to coplete testcase
Public bug reported: this bug could be with TESTCASE itself & not what I've filed against. Install attempted on - sony vaio ultrabook svp11216cgb (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT) The 1811 (https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/450/builds/311610/testcases/1811/results/) testcase requires me to use lubuntu-installer-prompt to connect to wifi.. HOWEVER I had no such option on this wifi-only device.. I had no options in drop-down; nothing I could select. I can connect to wifi correctly (thus was filed using ubuntu-bug on device) but only after LIVE session was connected and I can use nm- tray.. however I had no such option available at lubuntu-installer- prompt as mandated by install QA testcase). Of note, when I start `nm-tray` on the live session and open up dialog, no options exist there either.. I need to click + add add... thus what I see in lubuntu-installer-prompt doesn't worry me... If it wasn't for testcase; I'd just connect to wifi using nm-tray (adding wifi device) & then start calamares to install. Importance of this bug is ~null (its petty). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: lubuntu-installer-prompt 24.04.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-41.41-generic 6.8.12 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-41-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.498 CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Wed Aug 28 03:47:14 2024 LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04.1 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20240827) SourcePackage: lubuntu-installer-prompt UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: lubuntu-installer-prompt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078020 Title: lubuntu 24.04.1 RC install ; unable to coplete testcase To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-installer-prompt/+bug/2078020/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
@@nnelson/Neil, this is a specific bug thread on a very rarely triggered specific install case and NOT a support thread/site. You can get help with problems at the support tracker at https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu , or if you would prefer live chat support, you can find an IRC support channel for your flavor of Ubuntu here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/ChannelList. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org. Ubuntu 22.04 LTS upgrades to 24.04(.1) are NOT open, having been delayed (see details on Ubuntu community hub, which includes a list of the blocker bugs & more), but upgrades from Ubuntu 23.04 were supported only to the next release, and ended when Ubuntu 23.10 reached EOL (23.10 upgrades to 24.04 were open for ~three months prior to 23.10's EOL) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061326] Re: 24.04 beta hangs at desktop
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2061326 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061326 Title: 24.04 beta hangs at desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/2061326/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076329] Re: 24.04 grub-pc fails on dpkg-reconfigure
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2076329 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076329 Title: 24.04 grub-pc fails on dpkg-reconfigure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2076329/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1993739] Re: No sound after upgrade from 22.04 to 22.10 (but reverting to pulseaudio works)
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. Ubuntu 22.10 (kinetic) reached end-of-life on July 20, 2023. See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested in discussing it anymore. But if you are then please upgrade to the latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling us which new version it is in. ** Changed in: pipewire (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993739 Title: No sound after upgrade from 22.04 to 22.10 (but reverting to pulseaudio works) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pipewire/+bug/1993739/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074236] Re: installer crashed, cannot install kubuntu on my laptop
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. Ubuntu 23.10 (mantic) reached end-of-life on July 11, 2024. See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested in discussing it anymore. But if you are then please upgrade to the latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling us which new version it is in. ** Changed in: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074236 Title: installer crashed, cannot install kubuntu on my laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/2074236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073818] Re: Calamares Can't partition
I've just booted a current daily of Lubuntu noble (20240724) and had no issues resizing (existing partitions), deleting or creating partitions using calamares on my old hp dc7700. Three flavors of Ubuntu use calamares for noble (24.04), so calamares likely received more QA testing than prior releases where it was only used a single or two flavors (even it didn't receive more testing, it was likely done on more hardware given tree teams worked at it). I'll continue some testing (I'll use other boxes, plus expect to do the same with the current oracular ISO), but I'm not expecting any issues given QA testing already done on calamares for noble. Three flavors are testing for 24.04.1 currently. FYI: I didn't mention it, but installs worked; results as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073818 Title: Calamares Can't partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2073818/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073812] Re: Cant copy files from Android DCIM Camera folder
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073812 Title: Cant copy files from Android DCIM Camera folder To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dolphin/+bug/2073812/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073810] Re: Cant see android files until opened new Dolpin AND phone unclocked- how user can know that ALSO need to reOpen new Dolphin if not written such workaround until fix is released?
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073810 Title: Cant see android files until opened new Dolpin AND phone unclocked- how user can know that ALSO need to reOpen new Dolphin if not written such workaround until fix is released? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dolphin/+bug/2073810/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073818] Re: Calamares Can't partition
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2073818 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ** Changed in: calamares (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073818 Title: Calamares Can't partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2073818/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072443] Re: sudo doesn't work with chown in ubuntu24.04 LTS
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 Please note your description contradicts, ie. you state you're using both Ubuntu 24.04 LTS and Ubuntu 20.04 LTS according to your `lsb_release` results -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072443 Title: sudo doesn't work with chown in ubuntu24.04 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2072443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068658] Re: abiquity crash during new installation
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068658 Title: abiquity crash during new installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2068658/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069499] Re: ubuntu install failed
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069499 Title: ubuntu install failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2069499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072379] Re: text editor won't recognize usb. old one did.
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 gedit ( https://gedit-technology.github.io/apps/gedit/ ) is an older GNOME (GTK3) Text Editor, but it is no longer the default text editor of GNOME (GTK4) or Ubuntu Desktop; though you haven't provided release details. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures. At a minimum, we need: 1. The specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem. 2. The behavior you expected. 3. The behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). Please also ensure that you include the release and flavour of Ubuntu that you are using. Thank you! I've marked this as incomplete; as no specifics of release, package etc were provided. They can be provided with `apport collect 2072379` but I suspect you'll get better from a support site. ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072379 Title: text editor won't recognize usb. old one did. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/2072379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1440295] Re: 14.10 to 15.04: Cannot handle manual dpkg --configure prompts
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. Ubuntu 15.10 (wily) reached end-of-life on July 28, 2016. Ubuntu 15.04 (vivid) reached end-of-life on February 4, 2016. Ubuntu 14.10 (utopic) reached end-of-life on July 23, 2015. See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested in discussing it anymore. But if you are then please upgrade to the latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling us which new version it is in. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440295 Title: 14.10 to 15.04: Cannot handle manual dpkg --configure prompts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1440295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071534] Re: Not able to minimize or close applications
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071534 Title: Not able to minimize or close applications To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/2071534/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071525] Re: Unable to upgrade to newer version
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 ( I'd check your mirror, try changing it to the main archive or another ( https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archivemirrors ) as http://mirrors.piconets.webwerks.in/ubuntu-mirror/ubuntu/dists/ looks rather stale ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071525 Title: Unable to upgrade to newer version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2071525/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070315] Re: error in /etc/cups/cupsd.conf from today's patch
** Tags added: focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070315 Title: error in /etc/cups/cupsd.conf from today's patch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/2070315/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069717] Re: Upgrading from Ubuntu 23.10 to 24.04 fails on DisplayLink Module / evdi
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2069717 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ** Package changed: ubuntu => ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069717 Title: Upgrading from Ubuntu 23.10 to 24.04 fails on DisplayLink Module / evdi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2069717/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069527] Re: bluetooth is not turning on
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures. At a minimum, we need: 1. The specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem. 2. The behavior you expected. 3. The behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). Please also ensure that you include the release and flavour of Ubuntu that you are using. Thank you! Please note, bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069527 Title: bluetooth is not turning on To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2069527/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069219] Re: Software Updater fails to launch
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 No clues as to what your system is (Ubuntu Core? Ubuntu Desktop? Ubuntu Server?) were included in your filing. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2069219 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069219 Title: Software Updater fails to launch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2069219/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068811] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 installer is unable to create or use existing encrypted volumes if there is a drive on the system that has Windows with BitLocker enabled.
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068811 Title: Ubuntu 24.04 installer is unable to create or use existing encrypted volumes if there is a drive on the system that has Windows with BitLocker enabled. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2068811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068811] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 installer is unable to create or use existing encrypted volumes if there is a drive on the system that has Windows with BitLocker enabled.
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You've filed this report against ubiquity, which is deprecated and unsupported for 24.04 except in a very rare/limited case. You've provided no product details (Server? Desktop?) no clues as to ISO architecture, and you didn't file using apport tools so details weren't collected. Most windows machines are amd64, so are you using ubiquity? More likely its ubuntu-desktop-installer (Desktop) or subiquity (Server), but details are vague. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2068811 (As you don't have an install; do this from your install media) When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068811 Title: Ubuntu 24.04 installer is unable to create or use existing encrypted volumes if there is a drive on the system that has Windows with BitLocker enabled. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2068811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068604] Re: full-upgrade cause gnome crashes
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 ( You've filed this bug report against the ubuntu-release-upgrader package, which would release-upgrade a 24.04 release to Ubuntu 24.10, however there is no evidence that you've attempted that release-upgrade. You can convert this bug report into a question, questions being aimed at support, but gnome is not involved in upgrading a system to a later release ) ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068604 Title: full-upgrade cause gnome crashes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2068604/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067839] Re: not able to upgrade to 22.04
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067839 Title: not able to upgrade to 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2067839/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067830] Re: High power consumption of gnome-shell
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2067830 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. To resolve the issue, a Support site maybe more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067830 Title: High power consumption of gnome-shell To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2067830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067818] Re: Hardware acceleration in Google Chrome (.deb)
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and trying to help make Ubuntu better. However, it seems that you are not using a software package provided by the official Ubuntu repositories. Because of this the Ubuntu project can not support or fix your particular bug. Please report this bug to the provider of the software package. Thanks! google-chrome is NOT a Ubuntu package (not from Ubuntu repositories), but provided by google. Bugs with google-chrome need to be reported to google/chromium project (https://www.chromium.org/for-testers/bug- reporting-guidelines/) If you are interested in learning more about software repositories and Ubuntu, check https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Repositories. ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067818 Title: Hardware acceleration in Google Chrome (.deb) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/2067818/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067658] Re: Driver issue for Intel Alder Lake-P GT2 [Iris Xe Graphics] appears in Noble Numbat
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2067658 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ** Package changed: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067658 Title: Driver issue for Intel Alder Lake-P GT2 [Iris Xe Graphics] appears in Noble Numbat To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2067658/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067662] Re: Cannot install software-properties-common=0.96.20.13 on Ubuntu 16.04 anymore
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2067662 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. Please also note Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on April 29, 2021. See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases ESM fixes are usually related to security issues. We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested in discussing it anymore. But if you are then please upgrade to the latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling us which new version it is in. ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067662 Title: Cannot install software-properties-common=0.96.20.13 on Ubuntu 16.04 anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2067662/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066483] Re: lock screen
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 You've reported this as a documentation issue, but haven't provided details of which address/page where the documentation needs correcting. ie. Was it a page viewed after https://help.ubuntu.com/ and if so which page in ubuntu-docs needs correcting? and what exactly is the issue. Are you seeking support? If so I suggest a support site, this question can be converted into a question which will change the emphasis to support (instead of current focus on fixing an issues with ubuntu-docs or documentation). ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066483 Title: lock screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/2066483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066481] Re: lock screen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2066483 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066483 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2066483 lock screen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066481 Title: lock screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/2066481/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066309] Re: freezing, acting eratic
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2066309 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. I've marked this report as INCOMPLETE, as no release details, package details etc were provided. Once you've run the `apport-collect` command on your box, please return the status to "New". ** Changed in: gimp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066309 Title: freezing, acting eratic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2066309/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066310] Re: freezing, acting eratic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2066309 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066309 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2066309 freezing, acting eratic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066310 Title: freezing, acting eratic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2066310/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066158] Re: Can't boot to SD OS when insert empty USB driver
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2066158 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066158 Title: Can't boot to SD OS when insert empty USB driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2066158/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066158] Re: Can't boot to SD OS when insert empty USB driver
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures. At a minimum, we need: 1. The specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem. 2. The behavior you expected. 3. The behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). Please also ensure that you include the release and flavour of Ubuntu that you are using. Please note, bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709. ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066158 Title: Can't boot to SD OS when insert empty USB driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2066158/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066064] Re: Dell Latitude 5450 and 5550 Ethernet dropped packets (Intel Meteor Lake CPU with 8086:550a NIC)
** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066064 Title: Dell Latitude 5450 and 5550 Ethernet dropped packets (Intel Meteor Lake CPU with 8086:550a NIC) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2066064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066064] Re: Dell Latitude 5450 and 5550 Ethernet dropped packets (Intel Meteor Lake CPU with 8086:550a NIC)
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 You've filed this bug against the Ubuntu-Release-Upgrader package, which will upgrade a release from 22.04 to 23.10 (or 24.04 in the future), but no logs or mention of problems with that are mentioned. Ubuntu 22.04 LTS is a LTS release, thus has some kernel stack choices (GA = 5.15, HWE = 6.5, OEM = ...) but no clues as to product (Server? Desktop?) were provided, nor what install media was used (ie. kernel stack defaults are unknown). Your description implies network issues, where bug report is filed against the `do-release-upgrade` (or equivalent) command without logs.. I suggest trying support first.. as your issue maybe more linked to the linux kernel (or kernel modules) and not what you've filed the bug against; but no details as to what you're running were actually provided (release requires product & install media details to be known for LTS releases with kernel stack choice). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066064 Title: Dell Latitude 5450 and 5550 Ethernet dropped packets (Intel Meteor Lake CPU with 8086:550a NIC) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2066064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066098] Re: release upgrade doesn't work, way to many "Broken" to make sense of
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066098 Title: release upgrade doesn't work, way to many "Broken" to make sense of To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2066098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066081] Re: Nouveau failing to boot or glitches
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2066081 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066081 Title: Nouveau failing to boot or glitches To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2066081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065565] Re: package grub-pc 2.06-2ubuntu7.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065565 Title: package grub-pc 2.06-2ubuntu7.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2065565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064909] Re: Lubuntu and Kubuntu 24.04 fail to decrypt on boot when installed on encrypted partition
Thanks for the additional testing. The erase disk & install using encryption gets more QA (https://discourse.lubuntu.me/t/testing-checklist-noble/4809 shows six QA tests for that), and whilst there are some manual partitioning install tests, no encryption is mandated there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064909 Title: Lubuntu and Kubuntu 24.04 fail to decrypt on boot when installed on encrypted partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2064909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064882] Re: web camera doesn't work after update
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709 You've filed this bug against the upgrade process of 18.04 that upgraded you to 20.04 that was run 360 days ago? (Ubuntu-release-upgrader upgrades your release, last run 360 days ago, and won't be run again until you upgrade to 22.04, but you mention this as a regular cycle?) I suggest support, as I'm unsure what your issue is. It maybe helpful to convert this question into a question (ie. geared at support), at least until its worked out what your issue, but its unlikely the tool you ran 360 days ago & hasn't run again since. Maybe kernel, kernel module instead is your issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064882 Title: web camera doesn't work after update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2064882/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064909] Re: Lubuntu and Kubuntu 24.04 fail to decrypt on boot when installed on encrypted partition
Thanks for responding, AND asking for further help! Sorry I didn't think thru my wording clear enough... To be useful the `apport-collect` has to be run AFTER a failed install, however to confirm it failed (by your already provided description) you need to reboot & thus the report I want will have been lost (due to reboot). My mistake Sorry. -- NEW INSTRUCTIONS FOLLOW Please boot your machine again (install media), run the install (as you've done a number of times again) and then after install completes DO NOT REBOOT when asked to. Instead open a terminal and run apport-collect 2064909 ie. it'll add details from that machine, your ISO used, and the install report & other details from the currently 'it appeared to work' install... THEN YOU CAN REBOOT. On reboot, you can confirm the INSTALL FAILED (ie. you could NOT boot into your installed system) or INSTALL SUCCEEDED... At this time, return to this report & please just add a comment that followed instructions I laid out here (comment #3) and run `apport- collect` as requested, and please add the install FAILED TO BOOT (as described in bug description), or worked perfectly etc... (or whatever you feel compelled to add given you're running the install). THANK YOU for taking time here to make our Ubuntu system better (Ubuntu includes flavors like Lubuntu/Kubuntu..) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064909 Title: Lubuntu and Kubuntu 24.04 fail to decrypt on boot when installed on encrypted partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2064909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064909] Re: Lubuntu and Kubuntu 24.04 fail to decrypt on boot when installed on encrypted partition
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. If possible, can you boot your system (using 24.04 media you tried to install) and try the install again, assuming it fails again, please follow the following instructions AFTER the error has [re-]occurred. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2064909 ( When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064909 Title: Lubuntu and Kubuntu 24.04 fail to decrypt on boot when installed on encrypted partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2064909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064845] Re: Right clicking quickly will select the first menu entry
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2064845 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064845 Title: Right clicking quickly will select the first menu entry To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtcreator/+bug/2064845/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064846] Re: xfce4-panel should be upgraded to 4.18.6 if glib 2.80 is used
** Tags added: noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064846 Title: xfce4-panel should be upgraded to 4.18.6 if glib 2.80 is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/2064846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064668] Re: Calamares/Kubuntu 24.04: Can't create encrypted LVM
Likely duplicate (or related) to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1900266 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064668 Title: Calamares/Kubuntu 24.04: Can't create encrypted LVM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2064668/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064180] Re: calamares-finish-oem.desktop is untrusted
** Tags added: oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064180 Title: calamares-finish-oem.desktop is untrusted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2064180/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063984] Re: package chromium-browser 1:124.0.6367.78-0ubuntu0.22.04.1sav0 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus nouveau chromium-browser paquet pre-installation script a renvoyé un état d
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709.ReportingBugs. The package of chromium for 24.04/noble is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/2:1snap1-0ubuntu2 which is not what you're using. If you wish to file a bug report on your chromium package, you'd have to file it with whomever packaged it (PPA owner), as it's not a Ubuntu 24.04 package. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063984 Title: package chromium-browser 1:124.0.6367.78-0ubuntu0.22.04.1sav0 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus nouveau chromium-browser paquet pre-installation script a renvoyé un état de sortie d'erreur 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/2063984/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063500] Re: GIMP crashed with a fatal error: fatal error: Erreur de segmentation
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2063500 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. (The pasted details are intended for filing bugs upstream with GNU Gimp; Ubuntu system details have not been provided) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063500 Title: GIMP crashed with a fatal error: fatal error: Erreur de segmentation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2063500/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063516] Re: GIMP crashes on close
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2063516 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. (The pasted details are intended for filing bugs upstream with GNU Gimp; Ubuntu system details have not been provided) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063516 Title: GIMP crashes on close To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2063516/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063513] Re: torbrowser unusable - not accepting keyboard input
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2056578 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056578 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2056578 Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063513 Title: torbrowser unusable - not accepting keyboard input To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser-launcher/+bug/2063513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063545] Re: package click 0.5.2-2ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: new click package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063545 Title: package click 0.5.2-2ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: new click package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/click/+bug/2063545/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063502] Re: 24.04: dvd image wont fit on dvd and missing libraries
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures. At a minimum, we need: 1. The specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem. 2. The behavior you expected. 3. The behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). Please also ensure that you include the release and flavour of Ubuntu that you are using. The capacity of a dual layer DVDR(W) is 8.3-8.5GB (8.5GB unformatted), which will fit a Ubuntu ISO though you didn't specify what Ubuntu product/ISO you're meaning; eg. a Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS ISO is smaller (5.7GB) than this size for example. A single layer DVD is of course smaller, but the intended install media today has been a USB flash drive for some time. Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future users from hitting the same bug. I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709. Thank you! ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063502 Title: 24.04: dvd image wont fit on dvd and missing libraries To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2063502/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
Thank you Mate for working out issue & great explanation.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
install using Lubuntu 20240425 ISO (latest RC as of now) and issue reoccurred. on ISO is calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu4 as before - erase disk & install to dc7700 - install alongside (slider moved random amount as usual, so size [of partitions] aren't critical - install & re-use SDA1 (first installed partition; what was shrunk) and critically NO-FORMAT is used on reboot, no grub menu appears. if I go to terminal and `sudo update-grub`... no other OS is shown, with 'OS_PROBER will not be executed' message appears.. I can't boot into the other OS that was present before this QA-install test. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063357] Re: attempting to use idle brightness in lxqt-powermanagement leads to crash on 22.04.4 LTS
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You mention it was "Reported 1 year 8 months ago" if so please provide the bug report link, as you only provided reference to a support site (which isn't a bug report). FYI: I'd have appreciated a picture of the image in english; the picture provided via link to askubuntu alas wasn't in english. If you update your LXQt using Lubuntu backports, does the issue still occur ?? ie. your report here mentions using lxqt-powermanagement 0.17.1-0ubuntu1 where the version in Lubuntu backports (for 22.04/jammy) is 1.4.0-0ubuntu2~ppa1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063357 Title: attempting to use idle brightness in lxqt-powermanagement leads to crash on 22.04.4 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-powermanagement/+bug/2063357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061214] Re: [SRU] Software Sources is not compatible with deb822
Booted an install made earlier today on hp_compaq_dc7700 of lubuntu noble (20240424) ; https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/453/builds/300235/testcases/1701/results/ sudo apt update; sudo apt full-upgrade & no updates are available. (software-properties-qt 0.99.48.1) Following the "Intended Functionality" listed in the Bug.Description at the top of this bug report and behavior is what I'd expect. The `/etc/apt/sources.list` file contained comments only ; with all subsequent changes being reflected in `/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu.sources` and looked appropriate to me. However I'm tired, and fear I've missed something (that I can't 'put my finger on'), but I've repeated steps 1..7 twice & didn't locate what 'irks' me sorry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061214 Title: [SRU] Software Sources is not compatible with deb822 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2061214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
( another FYI I mentioned it's no longer re-creatable with Xubuntu due to forced FORMAT currently with `ubuntu-desktop-installer` ... the issue i'm referring to is/was https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu- desktop-provision/+bug/2058638 .. current 'fix' being to force format , but my understanding is that will be reverted once time is available to correct the current 'regression' format triggers with 24.04 over 23.10 & earlier) This bug (2060624) thus can only be triggered (I believe) by the calamares installer used Lubuntu, Kubuntu & Ubuntu.Unity; as ubuntu-desktop-installer is forcing format (at least for now). ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
Just an FYI... but on the two cases I've encountered this issue I didn't install as per #14. I'll have always performed a 1. full disk install (any prior partitioning erased); noble (may not have been lubuntu) but single partition only 2. install alongside (calamares wording; auto-resize type creating a second install) (ie. I did two install types & achieved same result as steps 1 & 2 as Mate (mkukri) in comment #14) At step 3 my usual thing is a 'replace partition' (calamares wording) install using one of the partitions (this is a FORMAT install).. where which partition I use is ~random (usually opting to keep the partition I'll most recognize as untouched; the install where I changed the wallpaper usually so easily recognized).. Any testing of 'install using existing partition' for me would be 4th (or 5th) install almost guaranteed I believe.. My point is it can be triggered in other ways I believe, but again very few users will encounter it... I rarely encountered it! (then again what I listed ^ is what I did today, do most days probably too.. maybe why I've not experienced it much as I suspect i re-use SDA2 most days (& not sda1); ie. changing wallpaper on that first install (of the day) so its recognized on the many installs that usually follow...) I concur with view not a release blocker. -- said by me on #lubuntu-devel (matrix) > It may worthwhile (if not fixed & I doubt it will be) for me to create a page > on [lubuntu]discourse(doco) for users should they encounter this issue ... > to me it's not a big issue; I've only encountered it rarely, it requires > specific conditions I doubt many will encounter.. but could be mentioned in > release notes as well with somewhere we can point users too... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
I completed an install on dc7700 - two systems (noble) exist on drive - boot install media (lubuntu noble RC) - select partition (I selected SDA2, ignoring SDA1) for `/` WITHOUT FORMAT - let it install (this system is OLD, legacy-BIOS so no ESP; Lubuntu's calamares doesn't create one by default for BIOS machine; iso.qa report at https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/453/builds/300140/testcases/1701/results/) on reboot; two options appeared in grub. - SDA1 was in grub & when booted looked untouched - SDA2 contained new install, file-system system directories all time-stamped mins ago (not hours ago) as expected for new install.. packages I added are present (fortune, clementine etc).. I COULD NOT RE-CREATE THIS ISSUE.. Only difference between this and prior install could have been I selected second partition (SDA2) where last time I selected SDA1?? but I can't see that as making an difference; could it?? Given I've only experienced this issue twice, and could not re-create.. I'd be happy with marking bug as INCOMPLETE.. I could re-try by installing to SDA1 (same type of install) if you think there is any chance of difference.. but I couldn't re-create issue today (me attempting same type of install on same box) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
I have made many installs of various boxes, and exploring logs of the iso.qa.ubu link in comment #3 i see only two references to this issue (within a few days of each other), which include the following --- hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 8gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt) testcase: install using existing partition --- I've made four installs on that box today (https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/453/builds/300140/testcases/1701/results/) yet did NOT experience the issue. Currently the box has two installs (first was full disk, then auto-resize equiv.. ) so I'll try and repeat the install I made in the next hour+ and see if it occurs. Lubuntu testcases are described here - https://discourse.lubuntu.me/t/testing-checklist-understanding-the- testcases/2743 but an INSTALL USING EXISTING PARTITION means - boot install media - using manual partitioning, selecting an existing partition (for /) BUT DO NOT FORMAT (ie. re-use it...) This is NO longer possible with Xubuntu as FORMAT is now mandatory (due to another bug, scheduled for fix post-release of noble..) I'll add some non-standard packages to one of my installed systems on dc7700 (per testcase; something for installer to re-install), then attempt to re-create this issue & reply back in an hour (or three) and see if it re-occurs... then provide detailed description of what I did (if issue re-occurs). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2013074] Re: changing monitor configuration & on next login, only one monitor is fully usable to LXQt
Another boot on next box - hp 8200 elite sff (i5-2400, 8gb, nvidia quadro 600) This box shares same screens, so pretty much same change in monitor.settings; except I didn't have to change the primary.display as what booted in live mode is what I prefer. identical issue & behavior though as last comment (#12) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2013074 Title: changing monitor configuration & on next login, only one monitor is fully usable to LXQt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openbox/+bug/2013074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2013074] Re: changing monitor configuration & on next login, only one monitor is fully usable to LXQt
first boot of lubuntu noble RC on - hp prodesk 400 g1 sff (i5-4570, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 5000/6000/7350/8350) live test, on adjusting displays to match my config... what was by default.right monitor below the default.left, plus making my.bottom (what was default.right) monitor the primary.display.. my.top monitor (what was default.right) now has no background, and right-click on black has the options of - terminal emulator - web browser - applications - obconf - reconfigure - restart - exit operation of system though is not impacted.. and with play (3-5 mins) I know I can revert the issue anyway (historically anyway) --- i was going to close down LIVE testing.. so used the (on display) EXIT menu to exit to see what it did... On clicking the EXIT on obmenu - both wallpapers now display - lxqt-panel is now gone (would be annoying for non-technical users) - right-click on background on both displays now shows LXQt menu - no borders in the windows I had open (fair enough given I exited openbox).. the wallpaper appearing on the BLACK SCREEN is what surprised me, thus why this add of detail. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2013074 Title: changing monitor configuration & on next login, only one monitor is fully usable to LXQt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openbox/+bug/2013074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062428] Re: Install randomly crashes/fails/hangs on systems with 3GB or less
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2062428 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. No clues as to product are provided (three flavors use calamares, though Kubuntu is used as example so it maybe Kubuntu but we don't know; is this 24.04? as its not said though mentioned too), nor clues as to what ISO was used, nor package version details. It's likely nothing can be done without this detail; as package versions have changed multiple times in the last few days & no useful data (no logs etc) were provided. Please in future use `ubuntu-bug`... which can be run even from terminal even during operation (or calamares-hang). If your system has already gone (ie. I assume it was LIVE and thus after failure you shutdown box), some detail can be added to the report if you BOOT the same ISO on the SAME HARDWARE and run `apport-collect 2062428` as requested there. This will populate most missing fields, even if no calamares-log will be attached (you'd need to re-run the install & have the same issue to get that). As currently little detail is provided, I'll mark this bug as incomplete. If you do run `apport-collect`, please change the status back to "New". Thank you for filing the bug report in attempts to make Ubuntu better. ** Changed in: calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062428 Title: Install randomly crashes/fails/hangs on systems with 3GB or less To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2062428/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060592] Re: lubuntu noble - another timeout issue (600 secs)
duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2062106 maybe??? that message says 900 secs (not 600) ... is there a condition for time of internet (900 for wifi; 600 for cable here.. but cause I see as identical) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060592 Title: lubuntu noble - another timeout issue (600 secs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2060592/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062106] Re: lubuntu noble - snap-seed-glue --seed ..calamares..snapd/seed krita -- failed to finish in 900 seconds
repeat only different timeout period? in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2060592 duplicate? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062106 Title: lubuntu noble - snap-seed-glue --seed ..calamares..snapd/seed krita -- failed to finish in 900 seconds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2062106/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062106] Re: lubuntu noble - snap-seed-glue --seed ..calamares..snapd/seed krita -- failed to finish in 900 seconds
If this isn't changed... Lubuntu (me) could always add a page at https://discourse.lubuntu.me/c/documentation/20 In summary; my install worked; except - the third party packages however were not installed, - the `/var/log/installer` directory did NOT exist thus some metadata was missing from the install etc Users have the option of (a) testing their systems, if it was like mine, everything appeared to work perfectly, and they can just add the 3rd party apps themselves & expect no further problems (they're unlikely to notice the missing metadata anyway) OR (b) restart install WITHOUT 3rd party apps... then reboot into their new install, and add the third party apps themselves. This option will ensure they have all their metadata (ie. in the future can look up what media they used for install, details of install etc, details that would be missing with alternative (a)) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062106 Title: lubuntu noble - snap-seed-glue --seed ..calamares..snapd/seed krita -- failed to finish in 900 seconds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2062106/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062106] [NEW] lubuntu noble - snap-seed-glue --seed ..calamares..snapd/seed krita -- failed to finish in 900 seconds
Public bug reported:
full install to sony vaio thingy
- sony vaio ultrabook svp11216cgb (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT)
testcase: testcase: full, encryption, EFI, internet, swap, updates
no ethernet, so limited to wifi (300n so should be that bad, but still
aussie nbn so not fast)
---
2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [1]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [6]: .. - details: Command snap-seed-glue --seed
/tmp/calamares-root-8p789tsd/var/lib/snapd/seed krita failed to finish in
900 seconds.
There was no output from the command.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
---
restartNowMode: user-checked
restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
---
dontChroot: true
timeout: 30
script:
- calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
---
unpack:
- source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
sourcefs: "squashfs"
destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.497
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Thu Apr 18 13:31:43 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240417)
RelatedPackageVersions:
calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.31
calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.31
xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: calamares (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble
** Description changed:
- add more later
+ full install to sony vaio thingy
+ - sony vaio ultrabook svp11216cgb (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT)
+
+ testcase: testcase: full, encryption, EFI, internet, swap, updates
+
+ no ethernet, so limited to wifi (300n so should be that bad, but still
+ aussie nbn so not fast)
+
+ ---
+ 2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [1]: void
Calamares::ViewManager::onInstallationFailed(const QString&, const QString&)
+ 2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: "External command
failed to finish."
+ 2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [6]: .. - message: "External command failed to
finish."
+ 2024-04-18 - 13:28:34 [6]: .. - details: Command snap-seed-glue --seed
/tmp/calamares-root-8p789tsd/var/lib/snapd/seed krita failed to finish in
900 seconds.
+ There was no output from the command.
+
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
- ---
- restartNowMode: user-checked
- restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
+ ---
+ restartNowMode: user-checked
+ restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
- crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
- efiMountOptions: umask=0077
+ crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
+ efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
- ---
- dontChroot: true
- timeout: 30
- script:
- - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
+ ---
+ dontChroot: true
+ timeout: 30
+ script:
+ - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
- ---
- unpack:
- - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
- sourcefs: "squashfs"
- destination: ""
+ ---
+ unpack:
+ - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
+ sourcefs: "squashfs"
+ destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.497
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Thu Apr 18 13:31:43 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240417)
RelatedPackageVersions:
- calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.31
- calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.31
- xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
- btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
+ calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.31
+ calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.31
+ xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
+ btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Summary changed:
- full install fail
+ lubuntu noble - snap-seed-glue --seed ..calamares..snapd/seed krita --
failed to finish in 900 seconds
--
You received this bug notificatio
[Bug 2060429] Re: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds.
This bug is LOW PRIORITY in my view... - not many people will use the INSTALL USING EXISTING PARTITION (non-destructive install) - the error occurs which stops the installer, but most of what is required was already done, so system has booted for me each time I've encountered this error (even if some metadata will be invalid; system has been usable). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060429 Title: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2060429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060960] Re: lubuntu noble beta RC says 23.10 (not 24.04)
Possibly obvious, but this appears on installed systems too, as I booted up a recent install on dell optiplex 780 to get details for Aaron yesterday & the 23.10 plymouth was there at boot/shutdown. (d780 another box that uses text plymouth instead of graphic) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060960 Title: lubuntu noble beta RC says 23.10 (not 24.04) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-artwork/+bug/2060960/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060429] Re: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds.
As requested by Aaron (matrix) I ran a command on dc7700 & reported results... also booted & ran it on d780 (which I'm using now) and results are rather slow. guiverc@d780-noble:~$ time sudo update-initramfs -c -k all update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-25-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-27-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-44-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.13.0-28-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.13.0-30-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.15.0-41-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.15.0-46-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.4.0-72-generic W: zstd compression (CONFIG_RD_ZSTD) not supported by kernel, using gzip update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-41-generic W: zstd compression (CONFIG_RD_ZSTD) not supported by kernel, using gzip update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-50-generic W: zstd compression (CONFIG_RD_ZSTD) not supported by kernel, using gzip update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-61-generic W: zstd compression (CONFIG_RD_ZSTD) not supported by kernel, using gzip update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-64-generic W: zstd compression (CONFIG_RD_ZSTD) not supported by kernel, using gzip update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.2.0-18-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.2.0-19-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.2.0-26-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.2.0-33-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.2.0-39-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.5.0-9-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.8.0-22-generic real7m6.659s user0m0.007s sys 0m0.006s Even though I initially filed this bug report on dc7700; the testcase is listed as an "INSTALL USING EXISTING PARTITION" which is a no-format install; meaning some old stuff can be found.. thus probably this issue.. The copy/paste of command is from a very recent install of noble on this box. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060429 Title: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2060429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060429] Re: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds.
repeated install (using existing partition) to - dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 5000/6000/7350/8350) again this issue The install abends (abnormal end) with error & thus doesn't continue/complete install... /var/log/installer/mediainfo OR all contents in /var/log/installer reflect a prior install (many ago).. but this install type is successful .. after all it's a non-destructive install (no-format) so much data survives from pre-install (date/time stamps of system directories match new install though, as most system directories get wiped) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060429 Title: lubuntu noble - /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30 seconds. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2060429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061698] Re: Editing image, selecting a region and it crashed GIMP_2_10_36
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 2061698 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu- bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ( No release, package details were provided, the developers the provided paste was for are upstream developers ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061698 Title: Editing image, selecting a region and it crashed GIMP_2_10_36 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2061698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061711] Re: lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
Of no importance.. but the 10 mins nothing will likely be
2024-04-16 - 12:32:43 [6]: .. Running ("/bin/sh", "-c", "snap-seed-glue
--seed /tmp/calamares-root-hazyaxmi/var/lib/snapd/seed krita")
2024-04-16 - 12:45:09 [6]: .. Running ("/bin/sh", "-c", "snap-seed-glue
--seed /tmp/calamares-root-hazyaxmi/var/lib/snapd/seed thunderbird")
after krita I noticed (& mentioned) a kf5 snap.. but that detail would
have come from my viewing `iotop` and the `snap download` command that
showed there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061711
Title:
lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2061711/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061711] Re: lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
** Description changed:
This is NOT a bug that can be fixed with code.
At most a fix maybe a line in the release notes, that selecting all 3rd
party software for inclusion can be SLOW IF you're using 3rd-world, some
aussie NBN or other older/slower internet connections (or just
infrastructure at canonical end anyway).
This report has been filed ONLY for timing purposes; so I can look, and
have record of how long install actually took (with calamares
running)...
A watched kettle always appears to take longer to boil... I was sitting
watching this install & for a long time is stayed at 90% with slideshow
repeating... I switched to show all messages and it didn't scroll up for
maybe 10 mins there either..
I actually CTRL+ALT+T and opened a terminal, made it full screen on this
boxes other display & `sudo apt install iotop` and let that run... From
there I could see downloads taking place (thru write) & eventually
- notice `snap download` progress to next page (krita, kf5 etc)... but the
- installer window remained at 90%.. then eventually 92%... |
+ notice `snap download` progress to next package (krita, kf5 etc)... but
+ the installer window remained at 90%.. eventually 92%... |
Many users may assume the installer is 'looping' or dead...
2024-04-16 - 02:17:35 (start of calamares)
2024-04-16 - 12:17:43 (calamares switched to local time I assume)
2024-04-16 - 12:48:06 (end calamares)
So ~thirty minutes to install, I didn't let it sit at any dialog.. just
selected items & continued...
This box may not be quick... but I believe issue is mostly internet
speed & what is required to be downloaded.. something we can't do much
about it..
Is a release note worth including??
Could a end-user think the install has failed is looping, when in fact
it isn't
I don't see how we can change anything, as even viewing the messages
calamares provides I didn't see progress for near 10 mins... thus why
I opened terminal & starting watching progress via `iotop`
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
---
dontChroot: false
timeout: 120
firmwareType:
"*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
---
restartNowMode: user-checked
restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
---
dontChroot: true
timeout: 30
script:
- calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
---
unpack:
- source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
sourcefs: "squashfs"
destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.496
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Tue Apr 16 12:48:16 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240415)
RelatedPackageVersions:
calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.28
calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.28
xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061711
Title:
lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2061711/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061711] Re: lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
** Description changed:
This is NOT a bug that can be fixed with code.
At most a fix maybe a line in the release notes, that selecting all 3rd
party software for inclusion can be SLOW IF you're using 3rd-world, some
aussie NBN or other older/slower internet connections (or just
infrastructure at canonical end anyway).
This report has been filed ONLY for timing purposes; so I can look, and
have record of how long install actually took (with calamares
running)...
A watched kettle always appears to take longer to boil... I was sitting
watching this install & for a long time is stayed at 90% with slideshow
repeating... I switched to show all messages and it didn't scroll up for
maybe 10 mins there either..
I actually CTRL+ALT+T and opened a terminal, made it full screen on this
boxes other display & `sudo apt install iotop` and let that run... From
there I could see downloads taking place (thru write) & eventually
notice `snap download` progress to next page (krita, kf5 etc)... but the
installer window remained at 90%.. then eventually 92%... |
Many users may assume the installer is 'looping' or dead...
+ 2024-04-16 - 02:17:35 (start of calamares)
+ 2024-04-16 - 12:17:43 (calamares switched to local time I assume)
+ 2024-04-16 - 12:48:06 (end calamares)
+
+ So ~thirty minutes to install, I didn't let it sit at any dialog.. just
+ selected items & continued...
+
+ This box may not be quick... but I believe issue is mostly internet
+ speed & what is required to be downloaded.. something we can't do much
+ about it..
+
+ Is a release note worth including??
+
+ Could a end-user think the install has failed is looping, when in fact
+ it isn't
+
+ I don't see how we can change anything, as even viewing the messages
+ calamares provides I didn't see progress for near 10 mins... thus why
+ I opened terminal & starting watching progress via `iotop`
+
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
- ---
- dontChroot: false
- timeout: 120
- firmwareType:
- "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
+ ---
+ dontChroot: false
+ timeout: 120
+ firmwareType:
+ "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
- ---
- restartNowMode: user-checked
- restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
+ ---
+ restartNowMode: user-checked
+ restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
- crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
- efiMountOptions: umask=0077
+ crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
+ efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
- ---
- dontChroot: true
- timeout: 30
- script:
- - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
+ ---
+ dontChroot: true
+ timeout: 30
+ script:
+ - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
- ---
- unpack:
- - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
- sourcefs: "squashfs"
- destination: ""
+ ---
+ unpack:
+ - source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
+ sourcefs: "squashfs"
+ destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.496
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Tue Apr 16 12:48:16 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240415)
RelatedPackageVersions:
- calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.28
- calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.28
- xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
- btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
+ calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.28
+ calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.28
+ xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
+ btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061711
Title:
lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2061711/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061711] [NEW] lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
Public bug reported:
This is NOT a bug that can be fixed with code.
At most a fix maybe a line in the release notes, that selecting all 3rd
party software for inclusion can be SLOW IF you're using 3rd-world, some
aussie NBN or other older/slower internet connections (or just
infrastructure at canonical end anyway).
This report has been filed ONLY for timing purposes; so I can look, and
have record of how long install actually took (with calamares
running)...
A watched kettle always appears to take longer to boil... I was sitting
watching this install & for a long time is stayed at 90% with slideshow
repeating... I switched to show all messages and it didn't scroll up for
maybe 10 mins there either..
I actually CTRL+ALT+T and opened a terminal, made it full screen on this
boxes other display & `sudo apt install iotop` and let that run... From
there I could see downloads taking place (thru write) & eventually
notice `snap download` progress to next page (krita, kf5 etc)... but the
installer window remained at 90%.. then eventually 92%... |
Many users may assume the installer is 'looping' or dead...
2024-04-16 - 02:17:35 (start of calamares)
2024-04-16 - 12:17:43 (calamares switched to local time I assume)
2024-04-16 - 12:48:06 (end calamares)
So ~thirty minutes to install, I didn't let it sit at any dialog.. just
selected items & continued...
This box may not be quick... but I believe issue is mostly internet
speed & what is required to be downloaded.. something we can't do much
about it..
Is a release note worth including??
Could a end-user think the install has failed is looping, when in fact
it isn't
I don't see how we can change anything, as even viewing the messages
calamares provides I didn't see progress for near 10 mins... thus why
I opened terminal & starting watching progress via `iotop`
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
---
dontChroot: false
timeout: 120
firmwareType:
"*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/lubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
---
restartNowMode: user-checked
restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
---
dontChroot: true
timeout: 30
script:
- calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
---
unpack:
- source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
sourcefs: "squashfs"
destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.496
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Tue Apr 16 12:48:16 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240415)
RelatedPackageVersions:
calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.28
calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:24.04.28
xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
btrfs-progs 6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: calamares (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug iso-testing noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061711
Title:
lubuntu noble - full (inc. 3rd party) install is kinda slow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2061711/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056578] Re: Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning
I'll add another affirmation that what Asciiwolf reports in comment #10 is working for me too on this (my primary) install where I've not had keyboard working for some time (see comment #4; late February 2024) Add line & restart apparmor, and start torbrowser & I can use it for the first time in ages. Thank you Asciiwolf - appreciate the solution. I wonder if the package this bug report is filed against is incorrect; but sorry I don't know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056578 Title: Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser-launcher/+bug/2056578/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061327] Re: 24.04 beta hangs at desktop
duplicate filing of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/2061326 ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061327 Title: 24.04 beta hangs at desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/2061327/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060960] [NEW] lubuntu noble beta RC says 23.10 (not 24.04)
Public bug reported: On this box (hp 8200) the text plymouth is used... and this it reports as Lubuntu 23.10 during boot. - hp 8200 elite sff (i5-2400, 8gb, nvidia quadro 600) ** expected result On booting a Lubuntu noble beta (24.04) I expect it to say 24.04 ** actual result It reports itself as Lubuntu 23.10 with some dots during boot --- I believe the issue is lubuntu@lubuntu:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text$ cat lubuntu-text.plymouth [Plymouth Theme] Name=Lubuntu Text Description=Text mode theme based on kubuntu-logo theme ModuleName=ubuntu-text [ubuntu-text] title=Lubuntu 23.10 black=0x0078C2 white=0xff brown=0x009DFD blue=0x00182C lubuntu@lubuntu:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text$ dpkg -S /usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text/lubuntu-text.plymouth plymouth-theme-lubuntu-text: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text/lubuntu-text.plymouth ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: plymouth-theme-lubuntu-text 24.04.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.496 CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Thu Apr 11 12:03:57 2024 LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240410) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: lubuntu-artwork UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: lubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble ** Description changed: On this box (hp 8200) the text plymouth is used... and this it reports as Lubuntu 23.10 during boot. + + - hp 8200 elite sff (i5-2400, 8gb, nvidia quadro 600) ** expected result On booting a Lubuntu noble beta (24.04) I expect it to say 24.04 ** actual result It reports itself as Lubuntu 23.10 with some dots during boot --- I believe the issue is - lubuntu@lubuntu:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text$ cat lubuntu-text.plymouth + lubuntu@lubuntu:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text$ cat lubuntu-text.plymouth [Plymouth Theme] Name=Lubuntu Text Description=Text mode theme based on kubuntu-logo theme ModuleName=ubuntu-text [ubuntu-text] title=Lubuntu 23.10 black=0x0078C2 white=0xff brown=0x009DFD blue=0x00182C - lubuntu@lubuntu:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text$ dpkg -S /usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text/lubuntu-text.plymouth + lubuntu@lubuntu:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text$ dpkg -S /usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text/lubuntu-text.plymouth plymouth-theme-lubuntu-text: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/lubuntu-text/lubuntu-text.plymouth ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: plymouth-theme-lubuntu-text 24.04.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.496 CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Thu Apr 11 12:03:57 2024 LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240410) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: lubuntu-artwork UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060960 Title: lubuntu noble beta RC says 23.10 (not 24.04) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-artwork/+bug/2060960/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
I've NOT encountered this issue with a install.alongside (calamares/lubuntu) or the ubuntu-desktop-installer equivalent (auto(resize) testcase)... as both installs (prior + new) appear in GRUB on second install when that is run. This is where it matters most anyway, and it works perfectly. I've only encountered this on manual.partitioning (something-else equivalent) and manually selecting a pre-existing partition for re-use (ubuntu-desktop-install now marks that as with format compulsory)... This will impact very few users.. and can easily be covered by a RELEASE NOTES message if required anyway, as very few users will be impacted by it (most will have no issue dealing with the PROBER edit).. -- Alas the Xubuntu install no longer exists; that install being overwritten by subsequent QA test installs. I'd have to re-create the issue, which won't be tonight... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice
The Xubuntu install was an install into one partition (SDA2) where two partitions exist both with OSes (SDA1 & SDA2). The resulting Xubuntu install booted without grub appearing on boot, and no way for a user to boot into prior SDA1 install of Lubuntu noble. Attempt as in original post of `sudo update-grub` reports Warning: os-prober will not be executed to detect other bootable partitions. thus my prior 24.04 system is not offered as boot option. I've NOT encountered this issue with an auto(resize)/install-alongside install, ONLY with something-else/manual-partitioning type of installs.. so its not all installs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624 Title: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
