On Oct 30, 2000, Hauke Fath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any chance of seeing a formal definition of the Amanda line
> protocol anytime soon?
As usual, it depends on someone volunteering to do the work :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red
I've successfully run Amanda on many different platforms and thought I had
the above platform working fine. Its been doing backups for almost a year.
Needed to restore some files only to find that somehow the files are
corrupt. For example a 46MB file restores as a 36MB file.
No indication of pr
I have a DDS changer, 12 slot. Amanda.conf names changer as changer file.
changer.conf lists starttape 1, endtape 12, cleancart 12...
Where do I look?
Version etc is in the stdout:
I started with slot 7 loaded, and then instead of moving to slot 8, it
moves back to slot 1. Mtx moves thru all
>shouldn't it be smart enough to create them then? ...
That's probably harder than you think. You'd want to use the exact
same code that will create them in driver/dumper/taper and it may not be
prepared to just create the tree/empty file without doing anything else.
As I mentioned earlier tod
>I have it set to 1800 sec, yet amstatus is reporting a process has been
>"stuck" for ~1hr now:
>
>hub.org:da4s1a 0 211984k dumping0k (0.00%)
>(0:41:03)
And you believed amstatus??? :-)
Amstatus is only reporting what gets put in the detailed amdump log file.
>While I generated these, I ran a little monitoring script ...
>and it shows clearly that 15 amandads and 3 client selfchecks are running.
At the same time??? As Paul said, that would be bad. There should only
ever be one amandad running on a client at one time. The first thing
I would check i
>how do I tell chg-chio that slot 7 is a cleaning tape?
I don't use chg-chio, but a quick glance at the code seems to indicate
it does not have a concept of "use only these tapes" from the changer.
Patches would be welcome :-).
>what happens if I put 6 blank tapes into my autoloader, that haven'
>Why is it that when I first run amcheck, it does not itself create the
>needed directories and files. Do I really need to do that each time a new
>disk appears on the network? ...
It's not the job of amcheck to create the tree or files. That's what
(the children of) amdump will do the first t
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 04:31:31PM -0500, Ernie Oporto wrote:
> Why is it that when I first run amcheck, it does not itself create the
> needed directories and files. Do I really need to do that each time a new
> disk appears on the network? I thought this was more automated than
> that...or am
Why is it that when I first run amcheck, it does not itself create the
needed directories and files. Do I really need to do that each time a new
disk appears on the network? I thought this was more automated than
that...or am I missing something? I'm using 2.4.2b2 on Solaris 7 with
Mammoth driv
Title: RE: Something very strange with amcheck -c (very long, sorry)
I won't claim to be an AMANDA expert (just a satisfied user), but I seem to remember that there only needs to be one amandad on each client, and there should only be one amandad in memory on any one client machine.
I would
>I am trying to flush dumps in holding disk from Oct27th.
>
>amanda@sundev1 [daily] % amcleanup daily
>amcleanup: processing outstanding log file.
>amanda@sundev1 [daily] % amflush -f daily
>amflush: /usr/adm/amanda/daily/log exists: amdump or amflush is already
>running, or you must run amcleanup
/amanda...
20001027: found non-empty Amanda directory.
Flushing dumps in 20001027,
today: 20001030
to tape drive /dev/rmt/0cbn.
Expecting a new tape. (The last dumps were to tape daily555)
Are you sure you want to do this? y
driver: send-cmd time 0.020 to taper: START-TAPER 20001030
taper: pid
I am trying to flush dumps in holding disk from Oct27th.
amanda@sundev1 [daily] % amcleanup daily
amcleanup: processing outstanding log file.
amanda@sundev1 [daily] % amflush -f daily
amflush: /usr/adm/amanda/daily/log exists: amdump or amflush is already
running, or you must run amcleanup
You ha
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 02:51:28PM +0100, Michael Lindermann wrote:
> Hi Jean-Louis,
>
> sorry, thats not the solution. i´ve installed amanda with samba support and with the
>--with-samba-user=amanda
> option and my disklist file defines magnus as
>
> technix.kn.ordix.de //magnus/C$ DailySet
>
Hi Jean-Louis,
sorry, thats not the solution. i´ve installed amanda with samba support and with the
--with-samba-user=amanda
option and my disklist file defines magnus as
technix.kn.ordix.de //magnus/C$ DailySet
^^
but I think amanda searches for a directory
Hi Michael,
You didn't configure amanda with samba support on technix.kn.ordix.de.
You should reconfigure it.
Jean-Louis
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 08:55:20AM +0100, Michael Lindermann wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> ok my amandapass looks like yours, so this can not be the problem. I
> think the problem i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexandre Oliva) writes:
> On Oct 27, 2000, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I'm left to ask -- what is holding up release?
>
> AFAIK, it's just documentation.
[...]
> Basically, someone has to go over all the existing documentation, see
> if it still applies to t
I´ve forgot to answer your question. It´s no problem to get a connect with the
smbclient.
./smbclient //magnus/C$ password -U amanda
Michael
Hi Paul,
ok my amandapass looks like yours, so this can not be the problem. I
think the problem is that the user amanda couldn´t reach the magnus,
´cause the error message is
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR: technix.kn.ordix.de: [can not access //magnus/do
20 matches
Mail list logo
