Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-02-02 Thread Padmini Murthy
s good to see some of you thinking of why you like these songs and what > sort of emotions they evoke within you. My responses are subjective and > should not be taken as final by any means. Let us discuss and debate > because I am learning and expanding as much as you may be. > > Take c

RE: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-02-02 Thread Dasun Abeysekera
en as final by any means. Let us discuss and debate because I am learning and expanding as much as you may be. Take care, Dasun To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:03:58 -0800 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originali

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-02-01 Thread Padmini Murthy
certainly entitled to your opinion; I hope that clarifies my > > point of view. Good stuff..let's keep expanding. :) > > > > Take care, > > Dasun > > > > -- > > To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-02-01 Thread Arijit Debnath
----- > To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:05:32 +0530 > Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality > > Dasun says >>Roja, along with the likes of Puthiya Mugham, Uzhavan, and >

RE: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-31 Thread arr pavan
I hope that clarifies my point of view. Good stuff..let's keep expanding. :) Take care, Dasun - To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:05:32 +0530 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standar

[arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-31 Thread Pravinder Sheoran
till learning too!! lol. I'm glad you understood my point though. Let's keep the discussion going. > > Hail ARR! > Dasun > > To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:15:12 + > Subject: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviati

RE: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-31 Thread Dasun Abeysekera
y point of view. Good stuff..let's keep expanding. :) Take care, Dasun To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:05:32 +0530 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality Dasun says &g

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-29 Thread Shah Navas
Dasun says >>Roja, along with the likes of Puthiya Mugham, Uzhavan, and Bombay would qualify as some of the most soulful and brilliantly crafted albums, but, not the most original. Dasun, I request you to elaborate on this. I don't have any music knowledge. But I see 'Thee Thee' from 'Thiruda T

RE: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-28 Thread Dasun Abeysekera
2008 13:15:12 +0000 Subject: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality Actually, let me modify my post a bit. Yes, ARR has lost his youth, freshness, and reblliousness. I agree with you there. There was an energy, innovativeness, and f

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-28 Thread Moin Ali
agreed to all your comments Chord; but i think he is still as innovative as he was before. however, i think he used to experiment more with synthesizers\instruments before and now he is considering melody and voices more. Chord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, let me modify my post

[arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-28 Thread Chord
Actually, let me modify my post a bit. Yes, ARR has lost his youth, freshness, and reblliousness. I agree with you there. There was an energy, innovativeness, and fire to those compositions, which perhaps many are missing today. I feel that he has made up for this loss through more mature c

[arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-28 Thread Chord
Wonderful essay. Too bad it doesn't change my opinion that ARR has not lost A THING since the beginning. He is just as brilliant and original as before. Let's agree to disagree and move on. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Dasun Abeysekera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Originality >

[arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-27 Thread shanavas.chemmamkuzhi
Dasun is talking about 92-96 era. Earth released on 98. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gomzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > well I feel thats nonsense. You can see his original works in earth then > onto lagaan and then upto swades atleast. Not to mention water ! > > On Jan 28, 2008 12:0

[arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-27 Thread Dinesh Vaidya
Dasun, Well worded effort in defining Rahman sound. Please do continue. For a long time there was no discussion on the group worth a challange. I do agree with the concern you and Ronojoy have expressed and there is nothing wrong in a healthy debate. It is essential to for all to understand t

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-27 Thread Gomzy
well I feel thats nonsense. You can see his original works in earth then onto lagaan and then upto swades atleast. Not to mention water ! On Jan 28, 2008 12:08 PM, : Avinash : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dasun.. That's really well thought, in depth writeup man. You > really stole my words!

[arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-27 Thread : Avinash :
Hi Dasun.. That's really well thought, in depth writeup man. You really stole my words! :) I was thinking, how to explain 'chord' about defining ARR standards and you perfectly reflected my mind.. :) Keep it flowing.. Thanks.. -Avinash -- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Dasun Abeysekera <[