In your HQ GK config you have not specified the IP address to which the GK
will be bound, commented below in blue:
gatekeeper
zone local HQ cisco.com <<< NO IP specified here, router will pick
one (see below)
no zone subnet HQ default enable
zone subnet HQ 10.1.5.3/32 enable
zone subne
Josh,
I think the reason why you have this because you are missing the binding
under the Voice vlan interface
make h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.1.130.1
*h323-gateway voip id HQ ipaddr 10.1.110.1 1719*
*
*
*
*
*also there could be routing issue so you might need to do this in all your
routers*
Hi All,
I have a strange issue I ran into on a lab recently. The BR2 gateway would
not register to the HQ gatekeeper unless I changed the IP address from the
'voice' subnet IP to the 'data' subnet IP.
The question said I could not configure the gatekeeper with Zone Prefixes,
Aliases nor could I re
Check your retry interval on device -> gatekeeper
On Aug 10, 2013 6:42 PM, "Karen Johnson" wrote:
> when we shut Gatekeeper, it always take time to go back up.
> is there any command to speed it up ?
>
> K
>
> ___
> For more information regarding indust
when we shut Gatekeeper, it always take time to go back up.
is there any command to speed it up ?
K___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check
Guys I got the fix,
The problem was a typo error due to my fast copy and paste
in SB router i type gateway command by default and that resulted the
following
R1#sh gatekee end
GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION
CallSignalAddr
Calls work when he is not in SRST so 3... must be sending to CUCM to be
processed and set to phones at site B. They are registered and work but
when unregistered they fail to work.
If we are going on this little snippet of his GK config we might need the
entire thing and those on the GW's to figu
Sorry, I assume wrongly that SBGW will ever take the call for "3...".
Your normal path is for both "2..." and "3..." to be pointing to CUCMTRUNK
only. Given that both SBGW and CUCMTRUNK are registered to the same zone,
it would be necessary to exclude SBGW from ever getting the call destined
to
Hi Hesham,
Essentially, the gw-priority is to advise the gatekeeper to choose SBGW
over CUCMTRUNK. The higher the number, the higher the priority. Without
this it will distribute the call to "3XXX" to both CUCMTRUNK and SBGW in a
round robin fashion.
If you give higher priority to SBGW, then
Hi Hesham,
If the problem is on the gatekeeper, it could be as simple as the zone
prefix not configured to point to CUCM for the pattern "3..."
Given that in normal situation, the zone prefix would be pointing "SBGW"
either dynamically or statically.
The configure with static zone prefix set wou
Hi Somphol,
HQ & SB are in the same zone
and i don't understand
> zone prefix THEZONE 3... gw-priority 100 SBGW
I think I should disregard it as they are int he same zone
It's all just the CUCM Trunk and has both 2XXX and 3XXX
I think that could make it work
Thank you very much for ur great inpu
Hi Hesham,
I have a few ideas. I want to remove a few things out of the equation,
first try to set codec for all inter-region to G711. Second, if you are
using Local Route Group (LRG), replace it with a more straightforward
settings -- i.e. point the RL directly to HQ gateway in your case for
r
Hi Hesham,
Thanks for the detail explanation and well thanks for sharing the case. I
find it very intriguing.
I'm working on some idea, but for now, I just want to forward your reply to
the group, in case anyone else can help too.
--Somphol
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Hesham Abdelkeree
TN in case the GK rejects or can't
reach SiteB phones.
Thanks,Ramy
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 19:45:41 -0700
From: heshamcentr...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper is unable to reach SiteB under Call
Forward UnRegister
Dear Experts,
SiteC
Hi Hesham,
> knowing that Gatekeeper is working with SiteB under normal operation but
doesn't work with CFUR
Could you please clarify the problem you are facing? What do you mean
when you say the gatekeeper is not working with CFUR?
> Any Ideas,
I think we will need to simplify the scenario t
Dear Experts,
SiteC is CME and connected with HQ and SB via Gatekeeper
Gatekeeper is working excellent with HQ and SB
I am configuring Call Forward Unregister for SiteB.
SiteB has Call-Manager-Fallback mode working excellent
Now, I have configured Call Forward Unregister
in the service parameter
gt;
> Take care, All the best.
>
> --
> *From:* Hesham Abdelkereem
> *To:* vignesh sethuraman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 12 March 2013 12:38 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
>
> Wow nice over there:)
> I like Sw
s
Michael Sears
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas MICHEL [mailto:mcl.nico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 6:10 AM
To: Sears, Michael (msears)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER ISSUE
Hi Michael
Check that the device pool associa
Hi Michael
Check that the device pool associated to the trunk got a Call Manager
group with both Pub and Sub.
Beside of that I don't know
Regards
PS: Never ask to answer ASAP please :) We are like you and owe nothing
but help if we can :)
Nic
Le Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:43:06
Greetings All. I'm having an unusual issue with my Gatekeeper which I have not
seen before.
My gatekeeper is on the mgcp HQ router. When I do "show gatekeeper end" I only
see GK_Trunk_1, the publisher and CME. The Subscriber is missing. I have
reset the trunk and gatekeeper many times. A
Hello Steffen,
One of the requirement of this task:
you are not allowed to use zone prefixes in this task. What are the other
way to achieve this.
Regards,
Ramcharan Arya
How should we send call to SUB vs PUB in this given situation and we are
not allow to
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Stef
You can define a gw-priority for the trunks to each endpoint.
Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2013 schrieb Ramcharan Arya :
> Hello,
>
> I have a small query about Gatekeeper in single zone configuration it is
> prefer PUB as call processing ( as per ARQ message).
>
> if lab requirement says make subscrib
Hello,
I have a small query about Gatekeeper in single zone configuration it is
prefer PUB as call processing ( as per ARQ message).
if lab requirement says make subscriber as call processing engine then it
does not meet requirement.
Does any one know the answer what is the solution of this tric
the Gatekeeper license has a 2 weeks trial period. if you did not purchase
the gatekeeper license, please go ahead and purchase. Nothing will work if
you doesn't purchase the license.
Regards
Symon Phares
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Justin McIntyre <
justin.mcint...@blackbox.com> wrote:
>
You could also downgrade to a IOS before the license enforcement took place
I believe something like 12.4.15 should work
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Bob Harman wrote:
> I was told by a Cisco engineer that the gatekeeper licensing is only a
> nag, and doesn't affect operations - at least as
I was told by a Cisco engineer that the gatekeeper licensing is only a nag,
and doesn't affect operations - at least as of this past Cisco Live. From
the way he made the statement, it didn't sound like Cisco was interested in
enforcement any time soon. If it is enforced, I'll be affected in a few
Hello,
I've been trying to figure out soemthign having to do with IOS 12.4(22)T. My
Gatekeeper licensing has expired and i am now getting the following error...
%LICENSE-4-INSTALL_EXPIRED: Expired license is loaded for feature: gatekeeper
1.0. UDI=CISCO2811:FTX1122A0BX; StoreIndex=0:Evaluation
It because you have Inbound faststart configured on your gk trunk. You do this
so your sip phones will be able to call from cme to hq. The thing is the call
is G729 but call manager will negotiate G711 with faststart enabled going that
direction. Take off the checkmark for inbound faststart and
I think I remember some tone a k this situation.
You chance the setting is service parameters for intra region to g729
HTH
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2012, at 9:10 PM, Krishna wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I configured the gatekeeper on the Hq router, and when i call from hq to
> br2(c
Post the output of "sh call leg active summary" in cme.
Also, share br2 config plz.
Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 14, 2012, at 8:10 AM, Krishna wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I configured the gatekeeper on the Hq router, and when i call from hq to
> br2(cme) the call set
Hi folks,
I configured the gatekeeper on the Hq router, and when i call from hq to
br2(cme) the call set up shows as 16 kbps, but whereas from cme to hq it shows
as 128 kbps but the actual call is connected with g729. Even after the call got
connected, it stills shows as 128 in the show gateke
voice@onlinestudylist.com"
Sent: Wednesday, 30 May 2012, 11:22
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper understanding
Why not try getting it to work first without the tech-prefix
Try this:
gk
shut
zone local UCM cisco.com
zone local UCME cisco.com
zone prefix UCM 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2
z
n Spicer
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper understanding
Hi Kevin,
Yes, gateway command was there and the "show gatek en" showed the BR2-RTR as
registered.
How does the technology prefix works in this situation (two zones)?
- Original Message -
From: A NN
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:47 am
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper understanding
To: Kevin Spicer
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Yes, gateway command was there and the "show gatek en" showed the BR2
t: Wednesday, 30 May 2012, 5:56
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper understanding
Hi, is ucme registered to the gk? (gateway command missing?)
On 30 May 2012 03:08, "A NN" wrote:
Hi list,
>I configured a GK with two zones:
>Zone UCM for CUCM
>Zone UCME for Br2 router
&
Hi, is ucme registered to the gk? (gateway command missing?)
On 30 May 2012 03:08, "A NN" wrote:
> Hi list,
> I configured a GK with two zones:
> Zone UCM for CUCM
> Zone UCME for Br2 router
>
> When I make Calls from CUCM to CME (3xxx) call fails as per debugs below.
> I'm not using any CUBE.
Hi list,
I configured a GK with two zones:
Zone UCM for CUCM
Zone UCME for Br2 router
When I make Calls from CUCM to CME (3xxx) call fails as per debugs below. I'm
not using any CUBE. Can please someone explain what's wrong with my config.
zone local UCM cisco.com 10.10.200.3
zone local UCME
Still nothing. I give up for the moment. The behaviour is the same in all
cases. Thank you guys for your time and advices. If you have other ideas...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Kevin Spicer wrote:
> I've seen supplementary service fail when CUCM invokes network hold and
> MOH doesn't suppo
I've seen supplementary service fail when CUCM invokes network hold and MOH
doesn't support the codec of the call (real world CUCM 6 intercluster
trunk), so might be worth disabling MOH to check.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:56 AM, The Masterplan wrote:
> Supplementary services still fails with all
om: "Mohd Baqari" >
> To: "san r"
> Cc: >;
> "The Masterplan"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper trunk
>
>
> Hi,
>>
>> If the command "emptycapability" then it ha
Try to add:
!
voice service voip
sip
midcall-signaling passthru
!
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Mohd Baqari"
To: "san r"
Cc: ; "The Masterplan"
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper trunk
Hi,
I
Try to put call on hold and see myopia is invoking from router.
Sh sccp
On May 24, 2012 11:26 AM, "The Masterplan" wrote:
> Supplementary services still fails with all these commands.
> Results of debug voip ipipgw are below. In case of call from cme to ucm:
>
> May 24 06:13:49.148:
> //1515/761E
Supplementary services still fails with all these commands.
Results of debug voip ipipgw are below. In case of call from cme to ucm:
May 24 06:13:49.148:
//1515/761E975F86AF/H323/cch323_set_h245_state_mc_mode_outgoing:
call_spi_mode = 3
May 24 06:13:49.148:
//1515/761E975F86AF/H323/cch323_set_h245
Hi,
If the command "emptycapability" then it has to work assuming that u kept gk in
media flow through mode.
Plz share the output of debug ipipgw on cube
Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari
Sent from my iPhone
On May 23, 2012, at 7:50 PM, san r wrote:
> emptycapability
___
Can you configure the same commands on Gk?
On May 24, 2012 12:21 AM, "The Masterplan" wrote:
> Yes, I have mtp on trunk. In the media resource group list assigned on
> trunk I have first a media resource group containing the hardware mtp and
> second a media resource group with the transcoder.
>
Yes, I have mtp on trunk. In the media resource group list assigned on
trunk I have first a media resource group containing the hardware mtp and
second a media resource group with the transcoder.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:46 PM, san r wrote:
> I believe it's supposed to be there on GK. Do you ha
I believe it's supposed to be there on GK. Do you have Mtp on trunk?
On May 24, 2012 12:11 AM, "The Masterplan" wrote:
> No, only the gatekeeper configuration needed to route calls and the
> following:
>
> voice service voip
> allow-connections h323 to h323
> allow-connections h323 to sip
> al
No, only the gatekeeper configuration needed to route calls and the
following:
voice service voip
allow-connections h323 to h323
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-connections sip to h323
allow-connections sip to sip
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:37 PM, san r wrote:
> Do you have the same on
Do you have the same on GK as well?
On May 24, 2012 12:05 AM, "The Masterplan" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the cme side relevant config:
>
> voice service voip
> allow-connections h323 to h323
> allow-connections h323 to sip
> allow-connections sip to h323
> allow-connections sip to sip
> h323
Hi,
This is the cme side relevant config:
voice service voip
allow-connections h323 to h323
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-connections sip to h323
allow-connections sip to sip
h323
emptycapability
h225 connect-passthru
h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru
sip
bind control source-in
Please paste your configs
On May 23, 2012 11:23 PM, "The Masterplan" wrote:
> I configured that, but the result is the same.
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:50 PM, san r wrote:
>
>> Try the following commands in voice class or H.323 voice-service
>> configuration mode - h323 end
>>
>> h225 connect
I configured that, but the result is the same.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:50 PM, san r wrote:
> Try the following commands in voice class or H.323 voice-service
> configuration mode - h323 end
>
> h225 connect-passthru
> emptycapability
> h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012
Try the following commands in voice class or H.323 voice-service
configuration mode - h323 end
h225 connect-passthru
emptycapability
h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:35 PM, The Masterplan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following setup:
> Sip IP phone <---> CME <--->h323<--
Hi,
I have the following setup:
Sip IP phone <---> CME <--->h323<> GK <--->GK trunk<> CUCM<--> Sip
IP phone
On the cme side I have a transcoder and sip ip phone configured with codec
g711ulaw.
On the cucm side I also have a transcoder on mrgl of gk trunk that is in a
device pool configure
I understand the debugging for gatekeeper in the scenario provided such that
the backbone gatekeeper cannot receive a call and we need to determine and
document the reasons the call will not go through. What I cannot seem to
find in the Online support available during the lab is the Cause Codes
Also as I remember, the IPIPGW tech prefix has to match the Destination
Zone prefix.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Steven <
forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net> wrote:
> @Boris
> @Leslie
> @Amit
> I got some other issues too.
> I skipped to check the GK-only functionality (BIG mistake).
> Aft
@Boris
@Leslie
@Amit
I got some other issues too.
I skipped to check the GK-only functionality (BIG mistake).
After i fixed the normal (without outvia) GK functions i revisited the
CUBE issue.
It turns out i accidently put the allow-connections on the Br2 instead
of the HQ.
Thanks for your tim
If the Voice service Voip commands are all configured...A restart has always
helped me ...
From: Boris
To: Steven
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper VIAZO
and do you have at least one h323 dial-peer on the HQ router
Leslie Meade
- Original Message -
From: "Boris"
To: "Steven"
Cc: "ccie voice"
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:19:21 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper VIAZONE - Could not fin
Hi Steve,
Do you have This in your config?
Voice service voip
Allow h323 to h323
If not, add it and do no gateway/gateway
Your cube should appear as H323 type in show gatek end.
Sent from my mobile device, sorry for typos.
---
Regards
Boris
On 18/01/2012, at 7:22, Steven wrote:
>
Hi there,
i got some problems with my viazone ("CUBE") at HQ-RTR.
I already checked the Tech prefix match and it seems to succeed.
But i'm clueless how to debug/resolve the "Could not find an
IPIPGW"-problem.
I also checked the dial-peers on HQ-RTR.
Any help appreciated.
Regards,
Steven
! **
Hi Justin,
Create a new Region with 729 codec only, create new Device Pool with this
region and assign your trunk to this new Device Pool.
Cheers,
Boris
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Justin McIntyre <
justin.mcint...@blackbox.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> ** **
>
>
There is not way to force Codec in CUCM (except setting the lowest
bandwidth consumption codec)
When you configure Regions settings in CUCM, that actually sets the Maximum
allowed codec within/between regions. Not the Codec itself.
So for instance, when you set G711 within a Regions, that means th
Hello everyone.
My question today is concerning controlling which codecs are
used when utilizing RAS signaling via the Gatekeeper. I understand that I can
control my codec inbound (at the BR2 CME) site via a inbound dial-peer that
only utilizes g729r8. I also understand that u
t Zone prefix if all the endpoints
>>> are registered in the same zone.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> --------------
>>> *From:* datucha123 datucha123
>>> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 17
> --
>> *From:* datucha123 datucha123
>> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:30 PM
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Call Routing
>>
>> Hello everyone.
>>
>> I ha
nts
> are registered in the same zone.
>
> Thanks
> --
> *From:* datucha123 datucha123
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:30 PM
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Call Routing
>
> Hello ev
Hi ,
Gatekeeper will route the call without Zone prefix if all the endpoints are
registered in the same zone.
Thanks
From: datucha123 datucha123
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:30 PM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper
Pls check the call routing diagram here , which has explanation.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_tech_note09186a00800a99c4.shtml
(Call Routing solely use tech-prefix here)
Some steps are not very descriptive , & no explanations available as well.
BTW can you send this output
What does the show gatekeeper end points command show?
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 17, 2011, at 3:00 AM, datucha123 datucha123 wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I have a question about the GK.
> I could not understand how does the GK knows where to route call based on the
> following GK c
Hello everyone.
I have a question about the GK.
I could not understand how does the GK knows where to route call based on
the following GK configuration:
gatekeeper
zone local test test.com 177.1.254.1
gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
no shutdown
CUCME and CUCM, both are registered with
> dial-peer voice 1132 voip
> destination-pattern 01132T
> session target ras
> incoming called-number 01132.
> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
> no vad
> !
> !
> gateway
> timer receive-rtp 1200
> !
> !
> !
> gatekeeper
> zone local GK ccievoice.co
urce Loopback0
ntp server 157.26.1.100
end
hq#
*From:* Amit Singh
*To:* Ray
*Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2011 4:52 AM
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper
Mate.
Please let me know what exactly is the problem.
I wi
Just to clarify for my own sake - are you referring to the Volume II Lab 4?
No 2nd trunk from CUCM to the GK zone CUBE, if that is indeed what you are
asking.
What makes the CUBE work from GK is the keyword "outvia" at the end of the zone
that CUCM registers to.
BTW, I've just finished up 3 ne
t: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper
Mate.
Please let me know what exactly is the problem.
I will be able to help.
Sent from my iPad
On 6/10/2011, at 7:39 PM, Ray wrote:
lab4 gatekeeper advance
>Do we have to setup another trunk to point to the gatekeeper zone CUBE or
>should we u
lab4 gatekeeper advance
Do we have to setup another trunk to point to the gatekeeper zone CUBE or
should we use the same trunk pointing to the zone GK?
I have tried thesame trunk and did everything i could, but my call is not going
through... help ..!!1
Guys ,
the h323 bind command is not a GK command , its for the H323 GW so you
can have GK on interface and have the normal config of the GK
and the H323 bind under the interface which will work as H323 GW with the ccm
H323 bind can be usefull if you have Q said bind all media and
signalling to sp
Did you do a gateway in config mode on the branch rtr? Is it registered?
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2011, at 1:12 AM, darshan wrote:
>
>
> Dear All;
>
>
>
> I have 2 requirements and I don’t know which one is the correct
> configuration..
>
>
>
> 1. For SIte C CME g
| CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper configuration
In h323 only one interface can be used as source IP for all h323 messages. You
cant have two h323 sources in same router. Maybe typo error
Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2011, at 12:12 PM, darshan wrote:
Dear All;
I have 2
In h323 only one interface can be used as source IP for all h323 messages. You
cant have two h323 sources in same router. Maybe typo error
Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2011, at 12:12 PM, darshan wrote:
>
>
> Dear All;
>
>
>
> I have 2 requirements and I don
Dear All;
I have 2 requirements and I don't know which one is the correct
configuration..
1. For SIte C CME gateway
>Configure SIteC Router as H323 gateway.
>Make sure that all inbound & outbound H323 traffic is
sourced from the local interface
Dude you have to take a rest
_
From: srman...@bellsouth.net
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:42:10 -0400
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER Dial Plan - Routing Question
I am working on a Gatekeeper Lab today and have most if the problems
resolved,
You can strip off the digits with a translation pattern
Hth
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 21, 2011, at 11:42 AM, "Stephen Manuel" wrote:
> I am working on a Gatekeeper Lab today and have most if the problems
> resolved, but one is stumping me and I think it’s because I ‘m frustrated and
...@bellsouth.net
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:42:10 -0400
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER Dial Plan - Routing Question
I am working on a Gatekeeper Lab today and have most if the problems resolved,
but one is stumping me and I think it’s because I ‘m frustrated and
There are a couple ways to strip the tech prefix for incoming calls into
UCM, the simplest is the Significant Digits field on your GK trunk. Set
from all to 4 (or whatever works for your dial pattern). If this doesnt
work for you, ie TEHO, then use a translation pattern, ie: 1#. or 1#.!
using
I am working on a Gatekeeper Lab today and have most if the problems
resolved, but one is stumping me and I think it's because I 'm frustrated
and need another set of eyes on the problem.
So Thanks in advance.
Here's a basic rundown on what I've got setup.
HQ router/site - MGCP control
I guess it's codec and region mismatch between CM trunk and CME dialpeer.
Regards.
Khaled
From: michael.se...@compucom.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:29:29 -0400
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [GATEKEEPER DIAL FROM BR23001 TO BR11002 GET YOU
gatekeeper. Check that for any errors.
Hope that helps,
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: michael.se...@compucom.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 11:29 AM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [GATEKEEPER DIAL FROM BR23001 TO BR11002 GET
YOU'
Hi Michael - is your gkp trunk set to 4 digits in cucm?
b
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:29 PM, wrote:
> I cannot complete calls from BR2 CME to BR1 or HQ using gatekeeper on
> HQ-RTR. I’ve verified the Gateway in CUCM and the Gatekeeper in CUCM and
> the Trunk and still calls will not complete fro
roctorlabs.com site.
> >
> > getting below error.
> >
> > Server Error
> >
> > The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete your
> > request.JRun closed connection.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
>
I cannot complete calls from BR2 CME to BR1 or HQ using gatekeeper on HQ-RTR.
I've verified the Gateway in CUCM and the Gatekeeper in CUCM and the Trunk and
still calls will not complete from CME to either BR1 or HQ Phones. I've double
checked everything. I've reset the gateway, trunk and CUC
CUCM by default does slow start and cube does fast start, that is
called an interworking issue. You can try the following:
Make CUCM fast start by adding a valid resource with the right codec
on CUCM and on the MTP or you can add the "call start interwork"
command under voice service voip on the CU
Hi All,
I'm testing with Gatekeeper with CUBE.
When i make call from HQ to site C through Gatekeeper , HQ Phone keep ringing
even the call answered in the Site C.
I have unchecked the "Wait for TCS" in the Gatekeeper trunk . but the results
are same.
How to proceed further on this ?
Thanks._
The publisher is not the primary server, so the first option should be the
subscriber.
Though the GK question may not be specific about which server to use first,
I would still configure the server preference as according to the beginning
of the exam where it tells you which server is the primary
Hi Peter - you can use the "gw-priority 10 cucm-trunk_1" parameter
within the zone prefix command to ensure the publisher is always
selected first.
hth
On 17/07/2011, Peter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the lab, suppose there is a general requirement like Subscriber should be
> the primary call processing
if the Questions ask to prioritize YES, i believe the Q will be clear enough
if they ask for this requirement in specific ,
if i am in the exam now and this is not specified clearly i will ask the
proctor and he must give me more accurate info about this :)
but General speaking they must tell you
Hi Ashraf,
Thanks for the response.
My question is, if there is no specific requirement in the Gatekeeper section
of the lab to have priority for Subscriber, are you supposed to do this
configuration using gw-priority command?
By doing, Are you going to lose any marks?
Peter
On Sun, 17 Jul 2
you would use something like this to proritize the call processing
zone prefix US 1… gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2
zone prefix US 1… gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1
zone prefix US 5… gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2
zone prefix US 5… gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Peter wrote:
> Hi,
By default the priority for each CCM will be server and you can prioritize
them using command Gw-priority .
Vik have explain/configure this in each GK config example he have in WB2
Thanks
Ash
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Peter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the lab, suppose there is a general requireme
Hi,
In the lab, suppose there is a general requirement like Subscriber should be
the primary call processing with Publisher as backup.
When you have a setup like HQ as CUCM and BR2 with CUCME, and Gatekeeper
between them. There is nothing specific mentioned in the Gatekeeper section,
related
1 - 100 of 483 matches
Mail list logo
