Thanks Goran,
I will turn that on - had no idea that was an
option.
Darrell
Check
out http://www.invariantsystems.com for
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring,
SURBL/URI integra
Scott,
The EU is like the internet - it's just a fad that will pass soon.
Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring,
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration,
Dean,
What you read in the manual is correct. The only way to do this would
be to setup junkmail via per user and have a test for each user as their
own blacklist. For a *small* group of users this could be done, but on
any level of scale it would be impractical not only from a management
a
Personally, I do not do per user blacklists. However, as one off
requests we have done this. In general if we are blacklisting something
its typically a global blacklist. Which may not be ideal in all cases
in an ISP type environment.
Darrell
Dean Lawrence wrote:
Thanks Darrell,
That wa
Has anyone ran across a way to have COPYFILE still work in cases where
the final action is DELETE/HOLD other than writing an external test?
Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Ove
David,
I think routing only covers cases where the message starts in the US and
exits and than comes back.
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg13204.html
If you search the archive about routing and look at the messages
specifically from Scott Perry you will get differ
Rick,
In this case you could setup a from filter as an outgoing test and
delete the null sender "<>". However, this is not an ideal long term
situation since this will happen over and over again. Ideally you need
to incorporate something that will do recipient checking for that
domain(s).
INVURIBL used to be fantastic, but it doesn't fare
quite as well these days. Does anyone recommend anything else?
invURIBL is extremely effective for me even more so now that
(personally) I am using the invaluement lists which haven been
absolutely terrific.
The one problem with the URI lis
Michael Cummins wrote:
invURIBL is extremely effective for me even more so now that
(personally) I am using the invaluement lists which haven been
absolutely terrific.
Wow. That blindsided me. I was completely ignorant of how the product
worked. I thought that Invariant Systems maintained
Michael Cummins wrote:
The product is basically the conduit from the URI in the email to the
list. In fact if you wanted to you could host your own URI list
internally and add domains as you see fit. We have many customers that
do this.
I understand now.
What does a record for URI look
10 matches
Mail list logo
