Re: [VOTE] Move Chainsaw to dormant

2024-02-12 Thread Scott Deboy
+1 Thanks Christian Scott On 2/12/24, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello, > > This vote is to put Chainsaw to the "Dormant" components. There is much work > to be done on this component, but not enough hours can be committed to do > that work. To reflect this situation to the user, it is better

Re: [chainsaw] Status change?

2024-02-06 Thread Scott Deboy
Thank you for spending time working on it Christian. I started contributing to Chainsaw in 2003. I agree. It's time. The primary benefit of Chainsaw was its built-in support for real-time tailing of ssh-accessible pattern-layout based logs - something Kibana doesn't support well, and something n

Re: [chainsaw] Question: oading/writing settings of ChainsawTabbedPane

2023-12-02 Thread Scott Deboy
That's great! Global app settings used to be loaded on startup and saved on exit. LogPanel-specific settings were persisted on exit and loaded on startup on a per-tab-name basis, mostly using LogPanelpreferenceModel. There are a few preferences I'd like to restore - the tab-expression event rout

Re: [chainsaw] Next steps? Or is it over?

2023-11-29 Thread Scott Deboy
I'll go through the UI and re-add small features that I think are critical but were lost in the log4j1-jettison effort. I'll follow-up in a new thread. Scott On 11/28/23, Scott Deboy wrote: > I've fixed the logger tree split pane UI (left artifacts when you >

Re: [chainsaw] Next steps? Or is it over?

2023-11-28 Thread Scott Deboy
28/23, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi Scott, > > I believe you; thanks for speaking up and being around. > > How can I help? > > I think Chainsaw needs to see a release soon, so what can I do to help you? > > I am glad to clean up things and whatever is necessary. >

Re: [chainsaw] Next steps? Or is it over?

2023-11-28 Thread Scott Deboy
I have dropped the ball here, but will commit to working on this, this year. I want to preserve a bunch of what can be done in the https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw/tree/chainsaw-with-log4j1-dep branch, and some of that just isn't possible because equivalent functionality was never added

Re: [chainsaw] What is necessary for a 2.2 release?

2023-10-13 Thread Scott Deboy
user hook things up - some sort of > visual programming/flow-based view would be very cool but also very > complicated. > > -Robert Middleton > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 3:24 PM Christian Grobmeier > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 8, 2023, at 23:19, Scott Deboy wrote: >

Re: [chainsaw] What is necessary for a 2.2 release?

2023-10-08 Thread Scott Deboy
rmat for storing properties. > > I am not sure what the status currently is, if Scott is still working on > it :) I could also make some kind of proposal or so for storing properties > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023, at 01:20, Scott Deboy wrote: > > I think persisting to json format makes se

Re: [chainsaw] What is necessary for a 2.2 release?

2023-10-02 Thread Scott Deboy
be commented. >> >>>>> I didn't remove those things yet, as they seemed to big and I >> >>>>> didn't >> >>>>> understand well how they'd work or how I would test (I lack the >> >>> knowledge >> >>>>> of ho

Re: [chainsaw] What is necessary for a 2.2 release?

2023-10-02 Thread Scott Deboy
thank you, its easy to track): >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw/commit/75bedf98665188eef4d13e4bfbb4b0dae456f65e >>> >>> One question: why did we remove Xstream? it seem there was an update >>> late >>> 2022 to address some security. >>> Should we ju

Re: [chainsaw] What is necessary for a 2.2 release?

2023-10-01 Thread Scott Deboy
I pushed branch "chainsaw-with-log4j1-dep" representing the working log4j1 code for those that want to easily see what used to exist. I'll probably selectively incorporate pieces from that branch into master. On 10/1/23, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2023,

Re: [chainsaw] What is necessary for a 2.2 release?

2023-10-01 Thread Scott Deboy
Middleton > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 3:14 PM Christian Grobmeier > wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 1, 2023, at 20:59, Scott Deboy wrote: >> > It's great to see the contribution, thanks Christian! >> > >> > I pulled down latest master and it looks like there are

Re: [chainsaw] What is necessary for a 2.2 release?

2023-10-01 Thread Scott Deboy
t log4j2-supporting feature. Scott On 10/1/23, Scott Deboy wrote: > It's great to see the contribution, thanks Christian! > > I pulled down latest master and it looks like there are some UI > glitches we should fix - for example, resizing the logger tree pane > doesn't

Re: [chainsaw] What is necessary for a 2.2 release?

2023-10-01 Thread Scott Deboy
It's great to see the contribution, thanks Christian! I pulled down latest master and it looks like there are some UI glitches we should fix - for example, resizing the logger tree pane doesn't render correctly. As I mentioned before, I assume there are a bunch of features we lost when we moved f

Re: Refining product feature set strategy

2023-09-29 Thread Scott Deboy
+1 to everything Ralph said. On Fri, Sep 29, 2023, 3:53 PM Ralph Goers wrote: > I’m sorry, I can’t really agree with much of any of this. Following the > thoughts being proposed in this thread much of Log4j 2 and even the initial > work I did to create it would not have seen the light of day. Al

Re: [chainsaw] Lots of commented code // Backwards compatibility?

2023-09-29 Thread Scott Deboy
I think Robert commented out most of that to get rid of the log4j1 dependency. I'm slightly concerned we'll lose a ton of UI functionality in that process, but it's in history if it's still needed, so delete away if you'd like. For comparison, you can look at the 'chainsaw-with-log4j1-dep' branch.

Re: [chainsaw] Is ZeroConf support relevant?

2023-09-29 Thread Scott Deboy
This is a log4j2 feature. Scott On Fri, Sep 29, 2023, 12:24 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Volkan asked this question here: > https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw/issues/24 > > I guess, since Log4j1 is EOL we can safely remove this feature, right? >

Re: [chainsaw] Trouble starting it at all

2023-09-29 Thread Scott Deboy
There should be a default config. Do you have anything in the .chainsaw directory? If so, delete it. On Fri, Sep 29, 2023, 9:49 AM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > OK, got it running, after commenting those lines: > > //statusBar.setSelected(config.getBoolean("statusBar")); > statusBar.setSelected(f

Re: [Chainsaw] Thoughts on moving forward

2023-09-25 Thread Scott Deboy
how up as green by default. The UI supports multiple tabs (log sources) and will live tail for you as well. Note the search results show up as blue in the log panel, and the gutter on the right displays the individual line colors (black is a search match). On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 8:46 PM Sco

Re: [Chainsaw] Thoughts on moving forward

2023-09-25 Thread Scott Deboy
ne instead of a table, so that fields do not get cut > off(like they currently do in the table) and it can better scroll like a > real terminal when new messages come in. Right-clicking will open up a > pop-up menu contextually depending on what it is you have clicked on(the > tim

Re: [Chainsaw] Thoughts on moving forward

2023-09-23 Thread Scott Deboy
Please review the various display setting controls. Most of what you mention can be toggled from visible to hidden. VfsLogFilePatternReceiver does exactly what you're describing. Allowing live remote tailing of logs over an ssh accessible path. You control if these logs end up in separate tabs or

Re: [VOTE] Move Chainsaw to dormant status

2023-09-22 Thread Scott Deboy
gt; > -Robert Middleton > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:30 AM Scott Deboy > wrote: > > > -1 > > > > While changes may be infrequent, the project is still useful and works > > well. I'll continue to contribute to maintenance. > > > > Scot

Re: [VOTE] Move Chainsaw to dormant status

2023-09-22 Thread Scott Deboy
-1 While changes may be infrequent, the project is still useful and works well. I'll continue to contribute to maintenance. Scott On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, 10:00 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > As earlier discussions[1] indicate, Chainsaw has been lacking on > maintenance and no PMC member stepped up to

Re: Retire Chainsaw

2023-09-19 Thread Scott Deboy
hat they can build a project that passes all their > security scans. > > Ralph > > > On Sep 19, 2023, at 11:26 AM, Scott Deboy wrote: > > > > Ralph, > > > > I already removed the socket appender vulnerability. I believe that was > the > > onl

Re: Retire Chainsaw

2023-09-19 Thread Scott Deboy
b Issues for Chainsaw AFAIK. > Both of these need to be addressed if the project is going to be considered > active. Are you willing to help with both of these? > > Ralph > > > On Sep 19, 2023, at 3:25 AM, Scott Deboy wrote: > > > > Well, it still works we

Re: Retire Chainsaw

2023-09-19 Thread Scott Deboy
Well, it still works well, and real time log analysis and Chainsaw's support for filtering are very powerful for many dev-local use cases. User base I can't speak to, but I agree based on lack of questions it's probably very low to non-existent. I'd prefer we find an option that isn't "nuke it fr

Re: [Chainsaw] Removal of Log4j1

2022-03-04 Thread Scott Deboy
ould be helpful if you have time Scott would be a >> manual on how to use Chainsaw and the features that it has. I >> understand it enough now, but for people first trying to use it there >> isn't really any good documentation. >> >> -Robert Middleton >> >&

Re: [Chainsaw] Removal of Log4j1

2022-01-16 Thread Scott Deboy
Looks great! It's a lot of work for sure - lots more to do to fully remove log4j1 - custom level support (java.util.logging and Android for example), support for UI-based interactions for some receivers(activateOptions), and the loggerRepository extension pieces. I definitely want to see VFSLogFi

Re: [Chainsaw] JSON Support

2021-06-18 Thread Scott Deboy
Arbitrary text formats are already supported in Chainsaw -files can be tailed locally or remotely (ssh) via a receiver that leverages Commons VFS: https://logging.apache.org/chainsaw/2.x/apidocs/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/vfs/VFSLogFilePatternReceiver.html The receiver supports the common pattern

Re: [Chainsaw] Minor fixes

2021-05-08 Thread Scott Deboy
Chainsaw Mac integration leverages java9 features now (Mac prefs menu integration). I can review merge requests. On Sat, May 8, 2021, 11:19 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > It appears that Chainsaw updated its minimum Java version to 9. I'll > get that fixed in the Jenkins build. As for committing the re

Chainsaw build

2021-04-29 Thread Scott Deboy
I've repaired the Mac UI integration and I think it's time to make a release. I'm not sure of the process, it's been forever. 'mvn clean site:site package' works fine for me on my Mac, including DMG creation. I'd like to get the DMG available to folks for download. Happy to help, Thanks, Scot

Re: [meta] What's been going on with log4net, log4cxx, and chainsaw? Request for reports

2021-02-10 Thread Scott Deboy
I'll work to get that Chainsaw release out. On 2/9/21, Davyd McColl wrote: > Hi Matt > > log4net has been quite quiet over the last quarter, partly because I took a > break from all things code for a month, and partly because I'm still trying > to pick up momentum after that break! > > However, t

Re: Chainsaw update

2020-11-07 Thread Scott Deboy
al) should use an allowlist of deserializable classes. > > > That's what we did in log4j2's serialized log event receiver code a > > > few years ago, for example: > > > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/commit/5dcc192 > > > (CVE-2017-5646). > &

Re: Chainsaw update

2020-11-07 Thread Scott Deboy
eneral) should use an allowlist of deserializable classes. > > That's what we did in log4j2's serialized log event receiver code a > > few years ago, for example: > > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/commit/5dcc192 > > (CVE-2017-5646). > > > > On

Re: Chainsaw update

2020-11-07 Thread Scott Deboy
I assume reverse-connect is still fine (SocketHubAppender/Receiver), as Chainsaw is being configured to reach a specific (assumed trusted) endpoint, yes? On 11/6/20, Scott Deboy wrote: > Holy cow. February? > > I have zero problem with us nuking the object serialization receiver >

Re: [CI][FAILURE] Logging/chainsaw/master#10 has potential issues

2020-11-07 Thread Scott Deboy
Updated to version 3 of the parent pom and clean site:site package runs fine, pushed to master. On 11/7/20, Matt Sicker wrote: > Looks like we need to either fix this pom or the parent pom. > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 21:34 Mr. Jenkins > wrote: > >> *BUILD FAILURE* >> Build URL >> https://ci-buil

Re: Chainsaw update

2020-11-06 Thread Scott Deboy
wrote: > Great to hear from you again! I don’t know if you saw it but there is a > Chainsaw related email on Feb 12 of this year in the private list that you > should take a look at if you are planning on doing some work on Chainsaw. > > Ralph > > > On Nov 6, 2020, at 5:5

Chainsaw update

2020-11-06 Thread Scott Deboy
Hey all, Long time. I decided to work through the pom ugliness and a couple of swing degradation issues in Chainsaw. I found an ASL2 Mac dmg creation maven plugin, and it works well on my Mac, if anyone cares to try it out please do. Pushing changes to master shortly.

Re: Re-enable appbundle-maven-plugin in Chainsaw build

2018-03-15 Thread Scott Deboy
ide a profile. Do you know how? I only discovered this issue when > writing the Jenkinsfile since I build it on macOS locally (and while > releasing). > > On 15 March 2018 at 14:58, Scott Deboy wrote: > >> Hi Matt, >> >> Re: 1123826836323a94d73355f0f6d7fd39466ad657

Re-enable appbundle-maven-plugin in Chainsaw build

2018-03-15 Thread Scott Deboy
Hi Matt, Re: 1123826836323a94d73355f0f6d7fd39466ad657 - Disable macOS packaging step Looks like you disabled this to get jenkins working? Has a comment: "FIXME: make this plugin optional" Can you re-enable it? Optional is fine, I test with this all the time. Thanks, Scott

Re: Bug in latest Chainsaw V2 (date 20.1.2018)

2018-03-15 Thread Scott Deboy
Nice catch! Will check it out. Scott On 3/15/18, ruch...@gmx.de wrote: > Hello, > > I just downloaded the latest version and there seems to be a bug when > importing / displaying log4j xml files: > > The line nr. is show in the column 'MILLISDELTA' (see screenshot). > > Regards > > Marc > > >

Soliciting input: ElasticSearch receiver

2018-01-27 Thread Scott Deboy
I'm looking at adding an ES receiver and was curious what folks would like to see when it comes to configuration options/capabilities, other than the ability to continually retrieve new events on some polling interval, which I'll make sure to add. Scott

remove Chainsaw's site code from git?

2018-01-26 Thread Scott Deboy
I haven't looked much at the src/site tree of Chainsaw, but it's clear that the 'real' site code in svn was seeded from Chainsaw's src/site at one point, but src/site is now stale. Can I blow that directory away and remove any site-related targets from Chainsaw's pom? Thanks, Scott

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc2

2018-01-25 Thread Scott Deboy
Thanks Matt! Looks good! Scott On 1/25/18, Matt Sicker wrote: > This vote passes with 3 +1 votes from Scott Deboy, Remko Popma, and myself. > I'll be following up with an announcement thread shortly. > > On 24 January 2018 at 18:50, Matt Sicker wrote: > >> So far so

Re: [log4j] The shape of Log4j

2018-01-24 Thread Scott Deboy
+1 The added complexity of managing the various repo builds and compatibility outweighs the build-time related cost of adding this code to core, easily. Just consider the time required to RM these other repos. There is no savings here to be found. Scott On Jan 24, 2018 6:20 PM, "Remko Popma" w

Re: [log4j] The shape of Log4j

2018-01-22 Thread Scott Deboy
My recollection is vague, tied to pom machinations supporting a similar separation for the 'log4j companions': outside of core log4j - chainsaw, component, extras, receivers and zeroconf' Some of the issues I recall having to deal with when we had the generic 'component' module: - Some classes s

Re: [log4j] The shape of Log4j

2018-01-22 Thread Scott Deboy
Correcting my prior comment: the nightmare I was referring to was the ugliness we did and un-did related to the never-released receivers and 'component' companions. Definitely feels like deja vu. https://github.com/apache/log4j-component/blob/trunk/pom.xml apache-log4j-companions-parent etc etc

Re: [log4j] The shape of Log4j

2018-01-21 Thread Scott Deboy
I recall the log4j logging-parent nightmare of a number of years back. Please let's not re-visit that. https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/blob/master/pom.xml Scott On Jan 21, 2018 4:51 PM, "Remko Popma" wrote: > Log4j2 is not like Maven. Maven (I assume) has a plugin API. Log4j2 > module

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc2

2018-01-20 Thread Scott Deboy
+1 Pulled the git tag, built it and started Chainsaw from the standalone tarball and zips. Wandered through the website - there is cleanup to be done, but that's work that can be done post-release. Scott On 1/20/18, Matt Sicker wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc2 > > S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2018-01-20 Thread Scott Deboy
Sure On Jan 20, 2018 9:04 AM, "Matt Sicker" wrote: > Wouldn't it be 2.0.0-rc2? Also, good timing: I can cut a new RC in the next > few hours. > > On 20 January 2018 at 09:47, Scott Deboy wrote: > > > Matt, would you mind re-spinning a new build at 2.1.0-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2018-01-20 Thread Scott Deboy
Matt, would you mind re-spinning a new build at 2.1.0-rc1? On 1/19/18, Scott Deboy wrote: > I finally looked at this. I pushed a change to app assembler config > to make the bin directory executable, and updated HOWTOBUILD to > mention you need to run mvn site:site first. > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2018-01-19 Thread Scott Deboy
be updated to > link to the (future) dist URLs instead of ones in the site's directory (no > proper mirroring in the old links). > > On 12 November 2017 at 19:25, Scott Deboy wrote: > >> I don't recall why - it was a while back :) >> >> Yes, I think 2.1.0-rc1 wo

Re: Log4JNA

2017-11-23 Thread Scott Deboy
+1 On Nov 23, 2017 10:20 AM, "Ralph Goers" wrote: > Or ask the author if he would like it to become part of Logging Services. > > Ralph > > > On Nov 23, 2017, at 7:51 AM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Remko Popma > wrote: > > > >> Interesting: > >> https://gith

Re: [Chainsaw] Next step: Log4j 2

2017-11-20 Thread Scott Deboy
Awesome! Re: appenders: We went through a couple of code re-orgs back in 2011 and 2013, some stuff was moved out of Chainsaw to apache-log4j-extras. Looks like some was left behind. You can define Chainsaw as an appender yourself - so the UI starts if it's in the log4j xml config file. Because

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2017-11-12 Thread Scott Deboy
I don't recall why - it was a while back :) Yes, I think 2.1.0-rc1 would make sense, once we fix the /bin directory issue. On 11/12/17, Matt Sicker wrote: > On 12 November 2017 at 13:53, Scott Deboy wrote: > >> That's right -forgot we rev'd to 2.1 internally (i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2017-11-12 Thread Scott Deboy
That's right -forgot we rev'd to 2.1 internally (info.plist, release notes, couple other places). Would it be easiest to release the new version as 2.1.0.0 instead of 2.0.0-rc1? Otherwise I could downgrade 2.1 refs, we never had an official release with that rev. Scott On 11/12/17, Mikael Ståld

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2017-11-12 Thread Scott Deboy
I think we can either fix or remove that menu item from the menu after the release - I don't know how useful it is. Scott On 11/12/17, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > When starting Chainsaw, I see this warning: > > Could not find any local JavaDocs, you might want to consider running > 'ant javadoc'. Th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2017-11-12 Thread Scott Deboy
Fixed. On 11/12/17, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > In the About text, it says: > > Please send questions, bug reports and/or feature requests to > log4j-...@logging.apache.org > > which is obsolete. > > > On 2017-11-10 20:00, Matt Sicker wrote: >> This is a vote to release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1. >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2017-11-12 Thread Scott Deboy
That's right - we don't bundle in a JMS jar, although users can add one to the classpath to use the JMSReceiver. On 11/12/17, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > When running Chainsaw, I see this error message: > > Failed to locate Receiver class:org.apache.log4j.net.JMSReceiver, looks > like a dependent cla

Re: Planning out what we can do to get Chainsaw back in the game

2017-11-12 Thread Scott Deboy
t;>>> definitely get Chainsaw back in the game. I think you would have an >>>> easy >>>> time attracting a talent pool for something like that. For example >>>> http://akveo.github.io/blur-admin/ is currently available on Github and >>>> has 80

Re: Planning out what we can do to get Chainsaw back in the game

2017-11-11 Thread Scott Deboy
think you would have an easy > time attracting a talent pool for something like that. For example > http://akveo.github.io/blur-admin/ is currently available on Github and > has 8000 stars. Could be the starting point for the next generation > logging UI. > > Cheers, > >

Re: Planning out what we can do to get Chainsaw back in the game

2017-11-11 Thread Scott Deboy
I'd love to hear what folks think of the user experience with the 'latest Chainsaw' and its feature set. There are a ton of features. It will be interesting to get a sense of how many of those features we get 'for free' in any of these other UI toolkits. It was a lot of heavy lifting to get Swin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2017-11-11 Thread Scott Deboy
I had ran mvn clean site:site install and it worked. On 11/11/17, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > On 2017-11-10 20:00, Matt Sicker wrote: >> Artifacts: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/chainsaw/ >> svn revision 23048 > > When I look at that URL, it says: Revision 23059 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2017-11-10 Thread Scott Deboy
Here's my +1. Site looks good, and it builds and runs. Thanks Matt On 11/10/17, Scott Deboy wrote: > Updated screenshot. > > On 11/10/17, Scott Deboy wrote: >> Awesome..I'll commit a new screenshot then. >> >> On 11/10/17, Ralph Goers wrote: >>&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2017-11-10 Thread Scott Deboy
Updated screenshot. On 11/10/17, Scott Deboy wrote: > Awesome..I'll commit a new screenshot then. > > On 11/10/17, Ralph Goers wrote: >> The web site doesn’t have to be locked into the release. An image can be >> updated after the release pretty easily. >> &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2017-11-10 Thread Scott Deboy
Awesome..I'll commit a new screenshot then. On 11/10/17, Ralph Goers wrote: > The web site doesn’t have to be locked into the release. An image can be > updated after the release pretty easily. > > Ralph > > >> On Nov 10, 2017, at 1:03 PM, Scott Deboy wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2017-11-10 Thread Scott Deboy
Would it be possible for me to push an updated screenshot and re-spin? On 11/10/17, Scott Deboy wrote: > Wow that screen shot looks ancient and ugly. I should pull up > something on the Mac with updated default colors - it looks much > better. > > Scott > > On 11/10/1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1

2017-11-10 Thread Scott Deboy
Wow that screen shot looks ancient and ugly. I should pull up something on the Mac with updated default colors - it looks much better. Scott On 11/10/17, Matt Sicker wrote: > Oh, and in case it isn't obvious how to test this, you can extract from > either the zip or tar.gz files and run the cha

Re: Planning out what we can do to get Chainsaw back in the game

2017-10-16 Thread Scott Deboy
FYI, I think most folks just use pattern layout, which probably makes VFSLogFilePatternReceiver the most commonly used receiver. Since it's VFS, anything accessible over SSH is retrievable and can be live-tailed. Also, Chainsaw V2 can pull in logs generated by Log4j2 if you configure an Advertise

Re: Planning out what we can do to get Chainsaw back in the game

2017-10-14 Thread Scott Deboy
ich aren't present at all in log4j2, are found throughout the code. A json receiver would be great! Me, I've been working on a private cloud IaaS implementation for a few years now - almost no Java there. Scott On 10/14/17, Matt Sicker wrote: > On 14 October 2017 at 13:28, Scott Deb

Re: Planning out what we can do to get Chainsaw back in the game

2017-10-14 Thread Scott Deboy
Try out Chainsaw - it's super useful once you get the model. Under help, there's info on the expression syntax, and the chainsaw-log tab (where chainsaw log messages route by default) can be a playground for working with the colorization/filtering/expressions. Here's my general flow: 1. Filter a

Re: Planning out what we can do to get Chainsaw back in the game

2017-10-14 Thread Scott Deboy
Awesome! Happy to help here where I can, although I haven't worked in Java in forever. Chainsaw is really five parts: - Receivers which grab the data from whatever source - The 'route events to tabs' mechanism - Table/event rendering, including search/filter/colorization and time deltas betwe

Re: Attempting to change consumers of Log4j 2 SerializedLayout

2017-06-30 Thread Scott Deboy
Chainsaw supports log4j1's xml format over UDP and TCP, as well as any regular text format via (VFS)LogFilePatternReceiver. It also supports log4j1's serialized loggingevent format. Chainsaw integration with Logj42 is via VFSLogFilePatternReceiver - you have to specify the pattern and an accessib

Re: Chainsaw in git

2017-05-30 Thread Scott Deboy
very java main() method deserves http://picocli.info > > > >> On May 31, 2017, at 8:54, Ralph Goers > wrote: > >> > >> At the request of Scott Deboy I have migrated chainsaw to git. You can > view it at https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw < > ht