Re: [dev] sc project to fix flashing of cells

Gregg Weber wrote: I would like to work on a change to the sc code. I have built the 2.0.4 source on my machine, and browsed the code for a month or so. The change my company wants me to make involves improving the drawing of the cells area of the sc window. Currently, it flashes, because the w

[dev] sc project to fix flashing of cells

Hi, I would like to work on a change to the sc code. I have built the 2.0.4 source on my machine, and browsed the code for a month or so. The change my company wants me to make involves improving the drawing of the cells area of the sc window. Currently, it flashes, because the whole thing is

[dev] formulas OO

Hello, Why the mathematical formulas in all OO versions have so low graphic quality? This happens specially when you save as HTML to publish online. 3+2 can appear as 3-2 ! From version to version of OO you can see many design changes: icons, logos, presentations, buttons,... but when it come

[dev] Re: CWS configrefactor01 unit tests ...

Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Stefan, Any chance you can help me get some skeletal unit tests setup for CWS configrefactor01 ? I'm very happy to write nice chunks of unit test, but getting the environment setup (and some config data to play with) is more problematic I think. I checked in the (

Re: [dev] How to add a menu item in the "File" menu?

Hello 蒋闯, As far as I can see the the file format is broken. I think you have bypassed the localization procedure. The process is described here: http://www.khmeros.info/tools/oo2.0_program_translaltion.html Pavel, please correct me if you have a better link for this case. You also may try to tak

[dev] CWS configrefactor01 unit tests ...

Hi Stefan, Any chance you can help me get some skeletal unit tests setup for CWS configrefactor01 ? I'm very happy to write nice chunks of unit test, but getting the environment setup (and some config data to play with) is more problematic I think. I checked in the (simple enough) testshl2

Re: [dev] Extending the binfilter Module

Hi Rüdiger, being late to the thread, and being the one who implicitly initiated this ... > Why would you copy additional stuff into binfilter? Because binfilter has a code base which lives several years in the past, whilst the current code base moves forward constantly. At some point, you simpl

Re: [dev] A few brief questions ad extension packages (Re: [dev] Class-Path Entry in Manifest Package File and the Location of the Respective jars?

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Stephan, , in the case of the ooRexx scripting engine: * there is a platform dependent DLL/so which needs to be accessible (at the moment I copy it into "OOoHome/program"), so the library is *not* an UNO-component, just a native library, * there

Re: [dev] Extending the binfilter Module

Jens-Heiner Rechtien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > Hm - hard to estimate how many of those binary documents are still in > > active use. And it would be interesting if they are kept just because > > of laziness, or for good reasons (I clearly suspect the former). > > L

Re: [dev] Extending the binfilter Module

Mathias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As long as no "must changes" are due the only disadvantage of binfilter > in its current form is that it must be rebuilt sometimes. That's bearable. > That reads "each time" for almost everybody outside Sun. But OTOH, it would prolly only shave off 3 mi

Re: [dev] SDK-only Java libs? (Re: [dev] Next .... (Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi there, just a stupid question: why doesn't the Bootstrap helper class use the "com.sun.star.lib.loader." knowing the important role of that library to find the OO executable ? See for a planned improvement in

[dev] Extension Manager [was: Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java]

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Stephan, The Ubuntu layout you described in a previous mail (libs in /usr/lib/openoffice/program, jars in /usr/share/java/openoffice) cannot work (at least not without some modifications to the OOo code base). Not sure why Ubuntu decided to ship a broken OOo (maybe th

[dev] error (CannotRegisterImplementationException): loading component library ldapbe2.uno.dll build error HELP

Hello, I am trying to build OOo 2.1 but build fails on insetooo_native just my luck :) This what I find out in log_OOE680__en-US.log this the first error in log register component 'ldapbe2.uno.dll' in registry 'c:\DOCUME~1\tane\LOCALS~1\Temp\i_12161170147993\wntmsci11.pro\OpenOffice\msi\service

Re: [dev] SDK-only Java libs? (Re: [dev] Next .... (Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Hi there, just a stupid question: why doesn't the Bootstrap helper class use the "com.sun.star.lib.loader." knowing the important role of that library to find the OO executable ? Regards, ---rony >>> However, *where* would one find the "com.sun.star.lib.loader." package? >>> >> Look in

[dev] SDK-only Java libs? (Re: [dev] Next .... (Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Hi Jim, >> However, *where* would one find the "com.sun.star.lib.loader." package? > Look in the SDK/classes directory... > > Get the SDK at api.openoffice.org Oh, I see. Was not aware of that at all. But this would mean that one cannot reliably deploy Java applications from the command line witho

Re: [dev] Next .... (Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: However, *where* would one find the "com.sun.star.lib.loader." package? Look in the SDK/classes directory... Get the SDK at api.openoffice.org jim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit

[dev] Next .... (Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Hi there, thanks to everyone, I was not aware of special needs to find OOo. Ashok was kind enough to send me his jar file, and its content is: Archive: helloworld.jar testing: META-INF/OK testing: META-INF/MANIFEST.MF OK testing: org/ OK tes

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: See, I would like to learn what is needed for an "out-of-the-box" Ubuntu OOo installation to be employed to run Java apps from the command line. (Here SDK/NetBeans/Eclipse setups can come into ones way as it is then not always clear which environment is in effect under wh

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

i have sent you the project with the build scripts offlist... but you dont need things like ld_library_path for the jar deploymet to work... there is an installationfinder & loader packaged within the jar which locates the openoffice installation and other arbitary paths automatically which i

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi, In fact... officebean.jar is not required for the helloworld appit was suggested by the netbeans wizard, but it will work without it That is very interesting! Could you please either send me the jar-file (or its included manifest file) and the settings of C

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Hi Jürgen, > the problem is quite simple. The Ubuntu guys install OpenOffice or > part of it in a way which is not supported in all cases. For example > the Java UNO bootstrap mechanism depends on a specific layout > (directory structure, Stephan has pointed out earlier). > And yes i agree that the

Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Hi Stephan, > The Ubuntu layout you described in a previous mail (libs in > /usr/lib/openoffice/program, jars in /usr/share/java/openoffice) > cannot work (at least not without some modifications to the OOo code > base). Not sure why Ubuntu decided to ship a broken OOo (maybe they > are not even aw

Re: [dev] A few brief questions ad extension packages (Re: [dev] Class-Path Entry in Manifest Package File and the Location of the Respective jars?

Hi Stephan, >> , in the case of the ooRexx scripting engine: >> >> * there is a platform dependent DLL/so which needs to be accessible >> (at the moment I copy it into "OOoHome/program"), so the library >> is *not* an UNO-component, just a native library, >> * there are three t

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Hi, > In fact... officebean.jar is not required for the helloworld appit > was suggested by the netbeans wizard, but it will work without it That is very interesting! Could you please either send me the jar-file (or its included manifest file) and the settings of CLASSPATH, PATH and LD_LIB

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

In fact... officebean.jar is not required for the helloworld appit was suggested by the netbeans wizard, but it will work without it On 2/5/07, Rony G. Flatscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One last remark: it is likely that your pacakge works because of "officebean.jar". But I would no

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

I tried executing the attached jar file on another ubuntu edgy box WITHOUT netbeans or the OO sdk...with just OO2.04 (the standard Ubuntu openoffice installation) installed, it works perfectly, if i do either : java -jar "helloworld.jar" or if do a launch with JVM from the Gnome file manager...

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Hi, > these were the required jar files suggested by netbeans: (i noticed > you didnt mention jut.jar in the comments of your code) > > juh.jar > jurt.jar > jut.jar > officebean.jar > ridl.jar > unoil.jar One last remark: it is likely that your pacakge works because of "officebean.jar". But

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Hi, > these were the required jar files suggested by netbeans: (i noticed > you didnt mention jut.jar in the comments of your code) > > juh.jar > jurt.jar > jut.jar > officebean.jar > ridl.jar > unoil.jar Thank you for this list, will look into it! --- Ad your environment: it seems that you

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Hi Rony, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi there, just wanted to report that the genuine OOo 2.1 can be invoked via Java from the command line, whereas the Ubuntu version cannot. Did remove the genuine OOo 2.1 and re-installed the Ubuntu OOo 2.0.4 version (the latest they have). The Ubuntu version p

Re: [dev] constructors in tools string classes

Takashi Ono wrote: Hi, Although the use of string classes in tools project is commented as depreciated, they are still used in many codes. They have constructors with one numeric argument to generate string of one character. To protect the misuse of these constructors, the class definition

Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Caio Tiago, thank you *very* much, your directions worked right "out of the book"! ;) First I deinstalled the Ubuntu OOo, then followed your instructions and was able to install the genuine OOo from the OOo homepage, getting the standard installation tree on the /opt

Re: [dev] Roundup extension packages for scripting engines ... (Re: [dev] A few brief questions ad extension packages (Re: [dev] Class-Path Entry in Manifest Package File and the Location of the Respe

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Stephan, after further experimentations a synopsis: * In order to install a scripting package under OOo one needs to supply a jar-file according to the scripting framework specs o if all parts are Java then adding all needed classes to that

Re: [dev] A few brief questions ad extension packages (Re: [dev] Class-Path Entry in Manifest Package File and the Location of the Respective jars?

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Stephan, thank you very much for your answers! ... cut ... * ad "application/vnd.sun.star.uno-component;type=native": No, such files are not put on any path. If those libraries are UNO libraries that support services/singletons, they will be found by the UNO