ing it via lmtp/smtp
Quoting Michael Peddemors :
On 2024-01-21 04:43, Patrick Domack via dovecot wrote:
Quoting Benny Pedersen :
Christian Kivalo skrev den 2024-01-21 02:08:
Just wish LMTP would not end up with duplicate Return-Path headers..
Duplicate return path headers? I don't
Quoting Benny Pedersen :
Christian Kivalo skrev den 2024-01-21 02:08:
Just wish LMTP would not end up with duplicate Return-Path headers..
Duplicate return path headers? I don't see them on my system. All
mail is sent from postfix to dovecot with lmtp
it simply works better with lda ? :)
Is it possible that those mails are missing the S= and/or W= size
flags in the filename?
I remember that being a requirement (the S= part, not sure if W= was
required).
I have stopped using maildir many years ago, and my script made sure
S= was added to every email, where the script you lin
Not really recommended editing the mailstorage directly once you start
using dovecot custom stuff.
If you need to fetch a specific email, I use:
doveadm fetch -u u...@example.com text mailbox-guid $guid uid $uid
Quoting acheka...@lazurit.com:
Some time ago I enabled compression on incoming me
I ran nfs3 with dovecot using dotlock and then nlm lock since 2008,
never had an issue, using maildir.
I moved to director arouns 2015, and then to mdbox to fix several
performance issues.
I have moved to nfs4 about 2years ago, but still using director and mdbox.
For me to move without direct
I finally restored
mail_location to it's former value, restarted dovecot, and it worked!
I wasn't aware that I had first to backup and then sync to transfer
all emails.
Thanks again!
Best regards
Kenneth
On Sun, 5 Feb 2023, Patrick Domack wrote:
#copy mailbox, using new mail_loca
#copy mailbox, using new mail_location setting
doveadm backup -u "${USER}" maildir:/home/${USERNAME}/Maildir/
doveadm sync -u "${USER}" maildir:/home/${USERNAME}/Maildir/
#Update user to use maildir instead of old method, update sql?
mail_location=maildir:/home/${USERNAME}/Maildir/
doveadm
I generally publish newer version to my ubuntu ppa at:
https://launchpad.net/~patrickdk/+archive/ubuntu/production
I don't hit every single release though.
But yes, only security updates are ever done to packages in released
versions. that is how they keep it stable.
The fastest releasing I h
It's because it doesn't move email by email to alt storage, but the
whole file. So the emails move as is, be them compressed or
uncompressed.
I think you could do what you want, but passing the correct options,
but I don't think it would be easy to do.
I would just store them compressed a
Not sure what this had to do with the question asked.
You're using mbox, but he is using mdbox.
Postfix is unable to write to mdbox itself.
Quoting justina colmena ~biz :
*My* inbox gets filled with thousands of emails, more or less
commercial content and trivial notifications from shopping o
Don't you mean:
doveadm mailbox status -t all -u 'p...@scom.ca' '*'
Quoting "Paul Kudla (SCOM.CA Internet Services Inc.)" :
&
# doveadm mailbox status -t all -u 'p...@scom.ca' 'p...@scom.ca'
doveadm(p...@scom.ca): Error: Mailbox p...@scom.ca: Failed to lookup
mailbox status: Character no
I just use all virtual user accounts. these virtual users have a flag
that I set, if I want that account to be a system account, for things
such as ssh/shell/... usage.
But a single user registry makes things much simpler than having
several, and then attempting to integrate them into a sin
I have checked my 6 dovecot servers that where upgraded a week ago to
2.3.18 and none of them have segfaults.
Once is using squat, three using lucene, one using xapian, and two use
nothing.
4 are running on ubuntu 20.04, one on ubuntu 14.04, and one on alpine 3.15
Quoting Bryan Jacobs :
D
This will depend on many more things also.
4 vcores, of unspecified dedication to your vm is not a good thing.
If you use something like gzip/bz2/lzma for compression of the emails,
will highly affect your cpu usage.
Searching and indexing will affect your cpu usage.
Quoting KT Walrus :
A
Quoting KT Walrus :
(I subscribed to a daily digest for this list and can’t figure out
how to reply to a reply.)
Anyway, Aki Tuomi replied to my feature request saying:
We support in latest 2.2 release
MD5 MD5-CRYPT SHA SHA1 SHA256 SHA512 SMD5 SSHA SSHA256 SSHA512 PLAIN
CLEAR CLEARTEXT PL
Those are my packages. I try to track each release, and bug fixed.
But since those are mine, I'm really concerned with stability as it
affects my enviroment. Mainly mdbox/maildir with gzip, at this present
time.
If someone lets me know of any issues, I will fix and adjust for it,
but I'm
I have been attempting to setup ssl on the doveadm port. So far this
works fine, as long as the global certificate is used.
I wanted to use a different certificate, one that machines the machine
name, instead of the generic mail certificate, but I have not been
able to figure out how to d
This looks good, except it is truncated, it should be something like
95chars long, Is your hash column set to 128 or up around there or
larger?
Quoting Carl A Jeptha :
Sorry for double reply, but this what a password looks like in the
"hashed" password column:
{SHA512-CRYPT}$6$wEn1UFuiMz
No, my patch still applies to make this happen though. It's just a one
word/line patch.
Quoting Jörg Backschues :
Hello,
does the recipient_delimiter option accepts multiple delimiter by now?
--
Regards
Jörg Backschues
Disabling chroot doesn't fix the issue, it just worked around it.
Aparently your chroot is not configured correctly, likely using debian
based system, and your resolv.conf in the chroot is not updated
correctly.
Quoting Dan Langille :
I wanted to mention I updated the Postfix and Dovecot S
What would happen if say, the dovegot xaps plugin is installed and the
daemon crashed?
Would peoples iphones just wait for the push notification? get email
every like 30/60min? or would it just use imap idle instead?
Just wondering about sideeffects :)
Quoting Stefan Arentz :
On Sep 15,
Maybe to help alittle.
This is two problems, so figure out what one to solve, or if you need
to solve both.
First is the datastore of the emails, second is the availability of
the service to clients. Each has their own issues and requirements.
Quoting Hoggins! :
Hello everyone,
Follow
Quoting Bob Miller :
I am trying really hard to wrap my head around why people insist on
using this program...
Where I have outlook 2013 users, I have had nothing but problems getting
their mail to work with imap. my solution has been to set them up with
pop, which works just like it always h
Quoting SATOH Fumiyasu :
I want to use CRAM-MD5 or DIGEST-MD5 (non-plaintext) authentication
for master users, but Dovecot 2.2.13 rejects it with the following log:
auth_mechanisms = plain login cram-md5 digest-md5
disable_plaintext_auth = yes
auth_master_user_separator = %
passdb {
Just as a random follow up for other people that might google this.
I also started to have this issue. I tried the two patches but they
didn't help.
I came to find out, this can also be caused from a disk full issue,
atleast when using maildir.
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
Actually, I think t
I'm having an issue with sieve putting some emails into the spam
folder, that should not be matching the spam rule.
I tried looking but can't seem to find a debug option.
Is there any way I can get a log of what the sieve rule path that
matches so I can locate the misfiring rule? or maybe so
Quoting Reindl Harald :
Am 05.05.2014 16:10, schrieb Hardy Flor:
Is there really no one with this problem?
next time quote the problem instead demand
others to seek for you in the archives
Even searching for him in the archives, I have no idea what he thinks
is a problem.
I know I have
If they where generated using crypt, why not tell dovecot to use crypt also?
Quoting KT Walrus :
I’m using the Dovecot Enterprise Edition on Centos 6.5, but Blowfish
password hashes don’t seem to work. What can I do to enable
Blowfish hashes for passwords? Maybe I don’t have my installati
Quoting Patrick Domack :
To make it work the current way, is simple.
I would love for it though, to lookup and see if an mailbox exists
with the delim first, then if it doesn't lookup just the username
part.
Quoting Andrew Ray :
Hi,
It would be nice if the recipient_deli
To make it work the current way, is simple.
--- a/src/lmtp/commands.c 2013-02-05 18:31:36.0 -0500
+++ b/src/lmtp/commands.c 2014-01-28 18:15:01.011677816 -0500
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@
return;
domain = strchr(address, '@');
- p = strstr(address, clien
Are you sure you wheren't looking at the ldap communication for the
username+password instead of imap?
Is ldap configured to use ssl?
Quoting pvsuja :
Yes,
proxy log says that its over TLS.
but the server is receiving username and password in plain text. I verified
it in wireshark.
I am usi
The issue is, drupal uses a custom password format.
You could rewrite the password hashs that drupal uses, into a normal
crypt ssha256 version, that dovecot will understand, but it will
probably going be much easier, to just program it into dovecot to
support it.
http://joncave.co.uk/2011
Quoting Reindl Harald :
Am 05.10.2012 14:00, schrieb Spyros Tsiolis:
Hello all,
I had a quick look at the horde site and noticed that
horde is being advertised as, let's say, "smartphone friendly".
Does anyone know if the newest horde version can "talk" to
smart phones in regards to e-mails
Maybe it's a cross program issue?
We used to randomly have this happen a long time ago, when using
postfix and dovecot.
Since switching to using the dovecot lda/lmtp instead of postfix for
mailbox delievery, I haven't seen this happen at all anymore.
I'm not saying that postfix is at faul
Only have 650 imap clients this weekend, have to give it a try during
a weekday.
Total(MB) Avg(kB) Name
2 4 /lib/ld-2.11.1.so
2 4 /lib/libbz2.so.1.0.4
2 4 /lib/libc-2.11.1.so
63 96 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
2 4 /lib/libdl-2.11.1.
BLF-CRYPT has been part of glibc for a very very long time. it uses
the blowfish crypt version, that have been changed like 4 times now,
do to issues with it.
I'm not sure why CRYPT wouldn't work for you, seems to work fine in my
dovecot installs.
I'm not sure where the dovecot < 2.0 can
Quoting Wojciech Puchar :
is random seek latency. And the faster the spindle, the lower the
latency. Thus 15k Seagate SAS drives are excellent candidates for mail
store duty, as are any 10k or 15k drives.
definitely not counting by $/IOPS rate. even worse looking with $/GB
which is more imp
Quoting Wojciech Puchar :
I think there are optimal situations where any configuration looks
good . . How often can a real-world disk actually deliver the 6Gbs
when only a minority of disk reads are long sequential runs on the
platters?
none of hard drives can saturate 1.5Gb/s
There are
Quoting Reindl Harald :
Am 23.06.2012 13:09, schrieb Wojciech Puchar:
it is already enormous overshoot in hardware specs. And i do not
really catch why you have "4 in parallel" servers.
And finally i cannot understand this dividing of servers just to
merging it back using VMWare.
because i
Quoting Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Timo Sirainen :
That file was fixed, but you probably have tons of them and it aborts
after each one. With IMAP protocol there's really no other good way to
do this. I guess if it notices one file being wrong it could just decide
to go into error recovery check and
Quoting Carlos Alberto :
Hi guys, sorry for bother
i'am looking how to fix the passwords with non-ascii characters (like ñ).
i'am using dovecot version 1.2.15 on debian.
Thanks in advance.
This has been tested many times, dovecot isn't the issue.
More likely your backend is causing a problem
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On 4.4.2012, at 16.04, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
where lmtp.example.com expands to your two IP addresses. DNS
server handles load balancing by returning IPs in round robin and
Postfix handles fallbacking to the second IP if the first one
do
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On 4.4.2012, at 15.29, Jerry wrote:
Now I use relay_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp.
Even if I change this to lmtp:tcp:1.2.3.4:24 it is still only one
director.
I don't know if Postfix supports that. Typically people use a load
balancer (cluster).
Perhaps
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
For the last few days I've been thinking about my company and what
it really should do, and as much as the current plan seems
reasonable, I think in good conscience I really can't help but to
bring up an alternative plan:
The support for Dovecot is quite good alrea
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On 21.3.2012, at 17.52, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Timo Sirainen :
It's renaming itself to itself again?
Hmm. Yeah, this is a bit problematic for compressed mails. If the
S=size isn't correct, Dovecot fixes it by stat()ing the file and using
it as the size. And that'
Thanks, applied it to 2.1.3 and going to test.
You didn't even give me enough time to look at the source myself to
find the issue.
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On 20.3.2012, at 16.55, Patrick Domack wrote:
but in .Trash/cur since I upgraded from 2.0.19 to 2.1 they have
double S and W
41500.M220929P17982.5013,S=24845,W=25526,S=24845,W=25526:2,Sa
This is happening for all folder moves.
the Sent folder isn't affected, but I assume cause an email wasn't
moved in that case.
Quoting Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Patrick Domack :
I'm having this problem also, with a very very few users.
I'm having this problem also, with a very very few users.
But in my case the email isn't double gzip, just single like normal.
Error: read(.../.Deleted
Messages/cur/1331840112.M186676P27974.5013:2,) failed: Input/output
error (uid=250)
All I have to do is rename the file to add back the lo
Quoting Noel Butler :
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 04:05 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 01/05/2012 03:36 AM Noel Butler wrote:
>
> Because with multiple servers, we store them all in (replicated)
> mysql :) (the same with postfix/dovecot).
> and as I'm sure you are aware, Apache does not understand s
Quoting Noel Butler :
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 20:58 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
To prevent rainbow table attacks, salt your passwords. You can make them
a little bit more difficult in plenty of ways, but salt is the /solution/.
Agreed...
We use Crypt::PasswdMD5 -
unix_md5_crypt() for a
Yep, I only meant it in the crudest of forms. I'm sure defining the
correct syntax will be the hard part.
Quoting Stephan Bosch :
Op 6-12-2011 16:00, Patrick Domack schreef:
Guess the next nice step would be to get sieve scripts to be able
to use the aliased special use folders. S
Guess the next nice step would be to get sieve scripts to be able to
use the aliased special use folders. So you can just say, fileinto
\Spam;
Quoting Patrick Ben Koetter :
* A.L.E.C :
On 06.12.2011 13:43, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> From my understanding RFC 6154 serves to flag some IMAP m
Quoting Alexander Chekalin :
With Maildir the message GUID is typically the same as the
Maildir base filename (i.e. everything before ':' character).
But what if I one day decide to convert my maildir's to mbox'es?
I really plan to do such conversion in a while (as soon as I finish the
indexi
Heh? they pretty much do exactly as described.
the service lmtp is how you inject email into dovecot using the lmtp protocol.
the service auth is how you can authenicate user/password against
dovecot, normally used in postfix for sasl auth
the mode setting is just that, the file mode to set
This sounds like a postfix issue more than dovecot.
Its easy to make a slow deliever transport for postfix, many people do
so when sending emails to hotmail/yahoo.
Sounds like that solution would work for you, just applied to the
dovecot transport instead.
Quoting Maria Arrea :
Hello
the email, and therefor it
would bounce if lmtp says it's not a valid recipient.
Quoting jake0...@airpost.net:
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 8:37 AM, "Patrick Domack"
wrote:
postfix delivers to the user, and I don't do lmtp authentication, I
just submit the email from
e a bounce.
I can't find anything that wouldn't bounce using lmtp, in postfix or
dovecot documentation.
Quoting jake0...@airpost.net:
Hey,
On Monday, October 10, 2011 7:46 PM, "Patrick Domack"
wrote:
I always keep it seperate, the user table is used by dovecot only,
I always keep it seperate, the user table is used by dovecot only, and
the alias table is used by postfix.
And then for users, you just alias them to themselfs. Then everything
exists in the alias table, and postfix knows all valid users, cause
they all exist in the alias table.
I just th
ems, one is just sql fully,
nothing interesting. My personal email is sql, but dumped to local
flatfiles. And another system I pull the info from windows AD.
Quoting terryjames9...@mm.st:
Hello Patrick,
On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 6:06 PM, "Patrick Domack"
wrote:
Using doveco
Well, the info dovecot needs, it mailbox name/location, username,
password, and quota, misc info.
postfix will need email address to mailbox name mapping info.
That is the very basic things you need.
Using dovecot lda/lmtp you remove all postfix needs to know mailbox
name to directory mappi
For my personal email, I have a habit of having the sql server down
for one reason or another. I just dump the sql tables to flatfiles on
the email server, and a script runs every 15min and checks for updates
if any exist. Works well.
Another method would be to just keep it sql, but dump th
I thinking your mail_plugin_dir is not needed, I don't have it
configured, and that path doesn't even exist on my system, maybe
hangover from 1.x config?
Quoting Helge Milde :
Hi!
I've followed the guide at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib to
try to make Dovecot gzip incomming mails
SATA 1 vs SATA 3 won't change the seek performance of the drive,
unless your stay fully within the drives cache.
Only 2 things affect how many iops you can get from a drive. The
physical diameter and the speed. You can affect the physical diameter
of the drive by selecting how much of the d
Just adding that won't make dovecot use it though, you would have to
include the postconf -n output. Normally something like
virtual_transport=dovecot
Quoting Simon Brereton :
On 26 August 2011 19:35, Patrick Domack wrote:
My guess is your delivering email with postfix to the
My guess is your delivering email with postfix to the inbox, instead
of using dovecot-lda. And something odd is going on with that postfix
to get odd permissions like that.
You probably needed to edit the postfix virtual deliever transport, or
maybe you just forget to active the dovecot-lda
Don't use dotlock files.
Method that generally works nice also is to start rejecting email for
the user when they are at 99% capacity, so you leave just alittle room
for that kind of thing left.
Quoting Joseph Tam :
A mail user reported that he filled up his INBOX (despite reminders he
w
Only thing that comes to my mind is to use shorter uidl's to id each
email, not sure what method your using now.
I would seriously consider just changing it to use imap instead, then
you can be notified if there is a new email, instead of downloading
the list each time.
Quoting Matt :
Doubt i
Ya, would have to be one of the namespace }'s is missing, as they are
right before mail_uid/gid
Quoting Remy Zandwijk :
On 11.08.2011 16:06 , Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Hi guys,
I setup a new box with Debian Squeeze 64bit and installed dovecot from
the sources. However, I can't start doveco
Was this using imap or pop3?
I haven't looked at how imap works.
But if your using pop3, set pop3_uidl_format correctly.
If your deleting or purging the index files and have it set to
anything other than %f or %Mf it probably won't work so well.
Quoting The Doctor :
Anyone seen this before?
looks like your missing the -d option to lda.
Quoting Firma Averlon :
Hi,
thanks for offering the oportunity to place a question here.
I am now already working since a week to get postfix and dovecot
working on a ubuntu 11.04 server.
Hard task. First step was naturally to get familiar with th
Mine has always behaved like this.
It looks up the root user in the auth database from the dovecot
config, and attemps to change to that user, and in this type of case
that would be vmail.
Then it attempts to check the mail_home and kind of fails, unless you
give vmail permission to that
that is hardly worth considering the load :)
Running spamassassin/clamav will use more load than dovecot would.
Probably using mutt directly against the mailstore might not be good,
but I have no issues with my own mailstore around that size.
Quoting Vegard Svanberg :
* Ricardo Branco [
This isn't http, there is no redirect command. Also the two protocols
are completely different and non-compatable.
The normal option for this is to just require encryption, then if they
use normal IMAP and attempt to do anything except secure it using TLS,
the connection gets dropped.
Qu
I wouldn't worry about *duplicate cache* as far as disk goes at all.
This duplicate cache is only going to benifit your vm, if the host
machine has enough left over ram. If the host machine doesn't have
enough ram, there won't be any cache to worry about. I think this also
only applies when
amavisd-new mailling lists :)
amavis only adds the spamass headers to LOCAL domains, so you need to
define your domains as local.
Quoting Dhaval Patel :
So I setup amavis-new and configured postfix/spamassassin/amavis.
Mail is still
delivered properly but I do not see the spamassassin inf
only enable the plugin for pop and imap, but not lda or lmtp modes.
Quoting "Daniel L. Miller" :
How can I enable zlib for reading compressed messages but not writing?
--
Daniel
ntp isn't a magical fix.
You need a good selection of source servers, or local time sources for
it to pick a steady reliable time to use.
Also, if the clock in your computer drifts too much, ntp will refuse
to correct it or keep it in sync at all.
Quoting Frank Bonnet :
Hello
I get th
I would seriously doubt it, as dovecot doesn't do calendar's.
Quoting Jake Johnson :
Is there a freeware or opensource calendar connector that will work with
Dovecot?
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks.
For my small setups of less than a few thousand users, I make a small
script that will dump the db tables to flatfiles.
This goes for postfix, and dovecot, with dovecot using the passwd file
backend.
I did this for a few reasons at first, mainly cause I had to split my
mysql and mail serv
Quoting Charles Marcus :
On 2011-04-07 11:38 PM, Patrick Domack wrote:
The paramaters that get passed, while not that hard, can be interesting
to setup, it seems lmtp passes much more info than you could pass to the
deliver-lda program on the command line.
The only downside seems to be the
Quoting Joseph Tam :
Is there a reason I should prefer LMTP over LDA for local delivery?
Performance? Security? The Wiki doesn't differentiates LMTP vs LDA
with respect to sendmail configuration, so am I correct that I just need
to replace mail.local with dovecot-lda, which will choose LDA/LMT
It doesn't exist.
doveadm belongs in dovecot 2.x, but ubuntu only has 1.x versions.
Quoting Walt Shekrota :
Hi
Where does this utility reside for installation. I use Ubuntu and
installed dovecot-imapd and dovecot-pop3d so far. Does it now ship
in the regular dovecot installation packages?
I converted all my box's over to mdbox, from maildir and ran into this
issue, I knew exactly what it was and fixed it, but might want to log
a config error or something for others to notice the issue.
I was running with pop3_uidl_format = %f, and well, that doesn't work
with mdbox very wel
I used a setup like this, to sync mail between 3 different
datacenters, in a multimaster setup.
For this I used unison, running every 28seconds. And it worked well
for two years, before I changed to a better approach. Older versions
of dovecot didn't like the moves very much (pre 1.0), but
Quoting CJ Keist :
I'm working on bring up a new mail server to replace our current
one. Our current mail server is running dovecot 1.1.16, with
postfix using mbox format. User inboxes are stored locally on the
mail server and all other mail folders in users home directory under
mail wh
In my measurements I did years ago, I found imapproxy to give a small
improvement compared to 0.9x dovecot, I believe that went away in 1.x
versions.
I did use imapproxy on a few systems. But over time I finally gave up
on it, mainly cause it kept crashing, causing webmail to stop working,
I think your just alittle confused.
There are two crypts basically, the crypt function, and the crypt hash.
The crypt hash has the 8 letter limit for the most part and is not
really used anymore.
when you specify {CRYPT}, dovecot just uses the crypt function, from
libc or libcrypt, and then
Why not make it easy on yourself. Just let dovecot use crypt, and use
whatever format your system crypt supports.
Personally I'm using 16byte salt, sha512 for mine this way. Seems
should work with everything, that lets you use the system's crypt.
Quoting Leonardo Rodrigues :
Em 14/02/2010
It's the real question of where the file is stored. For me, using nfs,
using compression given me several times the performance of nfs, vs
not using compression, for html files.
I would imagine the same benifits with email.
I would say something very close to the same with mdbox, if it's goi
Quoting Eduardo M KALINOWSKI :
On Qui, 14 Jan 2010, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
got it so, basically, i shouldnt be using .gz at all, is that ok ?
Yes.
i understood that, when moving from new to cur, filename should
be appended of ':2,'. But filenames on new, as i understood, should
I also like horde, but I will say it's not exactly an easy learning
curve for most people. The new dimp client makes things easier, while
losing lots of features.
For simple, and easy to install roundcube is the way to go. If you
want max power from a webmail package, defently horde.
Quot
Hmm, I haven't had any issues with BIS or BES users. But I checked my
config and I have:
mailbox_idle_check_interval = 120
I did that for other purposes, guess that just fixed it for me, before
bis ever started using the idle command.
Quoting "B. Cook" :
Ever since Columbus day things hav
Sucess on freebsd-6.2
Sucess on Linux 2.4.20 sparc64
The most out of date, oddball systems I have logins too.
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBS
I wonder if p0f would help at all, guess it depends what kind/if any
proxy exists between the mobile device and the server
Quoting Thu NGUYEN :
Yah, thanks!
I see HTTP can detect the OS but seems IMAP is new. So there is no way
actually
--
Regards,
Thu NGUYEN
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 23:
= (& (objectclass=User) (objectCategory=Person) (mail=%u))
Active Directory, as far as I know, by no means exposes users
passwords to third party applications or services.
Thanks in advance
Dimitrios
O/H ? ??? ??:
O/H Patrick Domack ??:
Yes, it's possible to do this
Yes, it's possible to do this. But not possible using auth_bind.
You are going have to login using an administrator account, then do an
ldap search for the email address, then authenicate against it. Using
auth_bind requires you to know the username before you login.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/
message from patric...@patrickdk.com -
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:31:37 -0400
From: Patrick Domack
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] "Time just moved backwards" in Dovecot in a Xen DomU
To: Noel Butler
yes, using a pool server for that isn't good. but atleast it will let
us
Hmm, I forgot to respond to this :)
I believe it's working for you, cause you last set dom0 to use it's
own clock, instead of xen, so now dom0's clock is getting synced via
ntp.
BUT the ALL of your domU's now, have no time sync. If your clock in
your computer is good, then all is fine (ex
If you notice in your ntpq dumps you did, you have >400ms of jitter.
That is a hell of alot.
I dunno if it makes a difference but you used 3 servers from the same
edu, and they have 90ms on them, shouldn't matter, if they where the
only ones with jitter I would replace them, but all 4 of your
This reminds me of an odd issue I had also, where mine stepped at a
given amount per time too. In the datacenter one server was at limited
it to 10mbit half duplex, and I had endless ntp issues. I could only
replicate this offsite with the same server using 10mbit and fully
saturating the n
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
