PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] EAC Mark in Russia
Brian, John et al,
So this points out that there are consequences for actions – even on
the World level.
I have learned from this exchange that I will advise manufacturers to
only consider ‘expensive’ certifications if they can e
PM
To: 'Pete Perkins' <peperkin...@cs.com>; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] EAC Mark in Russia
Pete
Ref you 2nd para, that was my preferred approach/advice re a CBA on
certification costs, having, for decades and with quite a few companies,
experienced at first hand the
!)
still ignored the reality of what they were letting themselves in for L.
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: Pete Perkins [mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: 04 December 2017 18:42
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EAC Mark in Russia
Brian, John et al
Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201
<mailto:p.perk...@ieee.org> p.perk...@ieee.org
From: John Allen [mailto:09cc677f395b-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 6:57 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EAC M
reign" sources thereof
must be minimised or completely eliminated wherever possible.
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:k...@earthlink.net]
Sent: 04 December 2017 10:08
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EAC Mark in Russia
If so, it would not be
of paid consultancy basis.
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: 04 December 2017 14:26
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EAC Mark in Russia
Thanks to all who have posted on this subject. It has been most helpful. We
y want.
Thanks again for your comments.
The Other Brian
From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:k...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 5:08 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EAC Mark in Russia
If so, it would not be the first time governments have used existing
regul
!
John E Allen
W. London, UK
*From:*Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 03 December 2017 22:20
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] EAC Mark in Russia
Brian,
I occasionally do work for a very large ITE product company with a
worldwide presence and so I've been
nt: 03 December 2017 23:10
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EAC Mark in Russia
JW
That's almost certainly true - t'was ever the case, regardless of the
continent/country J
HOWEVER, since the trade sanctions on Russia after the Crimea takeover and
the "invasions" in
tion name for
those, but I can't think of what that is at the moment!)
John E Allen
W.London, UK
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: 03 December 2017 22:54
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EAC Mark in Russia
Western Europe has been found to have some 'd
means – including
regulation!) for *everything* to be done in Russia, not elsewhere!
John E Allen
W. London, UK
*From:*Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 03 December 2017 22:20
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] EAC Mark in Russia
Brian,
I occasionally do work
] EAC Mark in Russia
Brian,
I occasionally do work for a very large ITE product company with a worldwide
presence and so I've been involved in international certs for a few of their
products. This year we learned that Russia started to reject all EAC certs
not issued by a Russian national lab
Brian,
I occasionally do work for a very large ITE product company with a
worldwide presence and so I've been involved in international certs for
a few of their products. This year we learned that Russia started to
reject all EAC certs not issued by a Russian national lab. The other CU
Hello Brian.
My company is going through EAC certification at the moment but for medium
volume manufacturing.
>From my understanding there is 2 types of compliance.
TR CU Certificate of conformity and the TR CU Declaration of conformity.
Essentially, the Certificate of conformity is meant for
Hi Brian,
I looked into this set of laws (CE clones) a few years ago for a single-unit
import question and recall 3 different 'levels' of conformance demonstration
being allowed for in the regs. It was something like model line
(factory-inspection -ish), large quantity, and single unit. I'm
15 matches
Mail list logo