Hi Gijs
Am 25.10.11 18:54, schrieb Gijs de Rooy:
> No matter what aircraft-split we end up with, aircraft authors will always be
> able to update their own aircraft at
> any time.
Hope so ;-)
With the current setup you can for example commit (and accept merge
requests) for your EC130:https://g
Am 25.10.11 19:09, schrieb syd adams:
> I dont personally see any advantage myself, I'd have to vote no.Sorry Yves.
>
> --
> The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
> demand for specialized net
Hi All,
In WIN32, building SG, due to the fact that I am
using STATIC OSG and pthread libraries, I added two
entries - OSG_LIBRARY_STATIC and PTW32_STATIC_LIB
to the CMake GUI...
But on SG generation done get
CMake Warning:
Manually-specified variables were not used
by the project.
Well, YE
Oh good. I figured someone would be way ahead of me :)
Cheers
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:32 AM, James Turner wrote:
>
> On 25 Oct 2011, at 14:30, syd adams wrote:
>
>> I haven't thought it out too deeply , but
>> maybe in this format :
>>
>> Aircraft: Citation-X
>> Author: Syd
>> Licence: GPL
>>
On 25 Oct 2011, at 15:20, Geoff McLane wrote:
>
>
>> need to see the arguments / environment
>> passed to CMake, to understand why.
> But in each case I have explicitly given you
> the exact exports and cmake commands used...
>
> What more do you need?
The problem is you've confused me, wit
Hi there,
maybe you have noticed some exceptionally high activity in recent days/weeks
on the Terragear repo. Well, there is one particular reason for it: It now
supports the cmake build system and, as of today, does no longer depend on
plib. These changes are not yet in the master tree, but ca
On 25 Oct 2011, at 14:30, syd adams wrote:
> I haven't thought it out too deeply , but
> maybe in this format :
>
> Aircraft: Citation-X
> Author: Syd
> Licence: GPL
> URL: git clone or download url
> Splash: path/url to thumbnail
>
> It would be up to the aircraft developers to fill it in and
> On the other side clone each of the 300+ aircraft isn't that comfortable as
> well.
There are various ways to tackle that problem. One could write a script to
clone/pull all
the aircraft with a single click, but an even nicer solution might be to use
"submodules",
as mentioned at the wiki (
Hello,
>there was little input on the fgdata split and few people speaking up
>when things were started. We do see a lot of responses now - many being
>in favor of the change, but also concerns about remaining issues.
>Indeed, setting up the new repo isn't as simple as it seemed initially,
>and
I dont personally see any advantage myself, I'd have to vote no.Sorry Yves.
--
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
Ta
Hi,
On Monday, October 24, 2011 10:27:11 thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> My understanding is that
>
> * the vertex shader computes stuff for each vertex
Yes.
> If I don't use a fragment shader (as e.g. in the 3dclouds), things like
> shading get a linear interpolation between vertices.
You need
Hi, good to see some more factual discussions. Let me emphasize that anyone is
welcome to add/edit
concerns/questions/answers/solution to the wiki:
http://wiki.flightgear.org/FlightGear_Git:_splitting_fgdata
> Those who have commit rights are already busy with their own stuff. For a new
> airc
Hello,
>IMHO that adds another not very logical layer of complication for little
>>gain. There's a nice "democratic" aspect to every aircraft being in a
>>single central repository, and reduced opportunities for those "clique" >type
>groups that so naturally spring up and are divisive and very
Hi,
Some of you have already noticed that berlios is closing at the end of the
year. So OpenRTI needs to find a new home.
I have recently just changed my upstream repository to
git://gitorious.org/openrti/openrti.git
This is not a full replacement for the berlios site, but currently at least
On Monday, October 24, 2011 22:12:15 Martin Spott wrote:
> George Patterson wrote:
> > Btw, Berlios is closing on 31/12/2011 so grab what you need now. I am
> > not sure if Mathias has moved the above project to another host.
>
> I'm sure Mathias will speak about the details himself, but aside fro
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 14:53 +0100, James Turner wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2011, at 13:17, Geoff McLane wrote:
>
> >
> > In my case I like to be able to compile
> > against different versions of say OSG - like -
> >
> > OSG301=1# stable release 3.0.1 - default
> > OSG283=0# general rele
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:18:36 +0200
HB-GRAL wrote:
> Hi Core (and the rest of the entire organism of course)
> Why not splitting up the Aircraft folder into hangars as collection of
> aircrafts as plug-ins, collection of big teams or small but heavy
> industries ?
IMHO that adds another not ver
Hi . Though it appears to have it's drawbacks , from a selfish point
of view ,the split makes work here much easier. Thanks again.
Just another (possibly useless) idea . What about adding a text/xml
file of all available aircraft , or even an aircraft.dat
file,somewhere in fgdata? I haven't thought
Am 24.10.2011 13:08, schrieb James Turner:
> [...]
> Also, there is something configuration dependent happening here,
> since other people have reported a similar issue (also with Ubuntu
> 11) on IRC, but I don't see the issue on my Ubuntu install.
>
> Anyone else seeing this problem (on any other
On 25 Oct 2011, at 09:39, Adrian Musceac wrote:
> Hi James, and thanks for updating the readme. I may be blind or just stupid,
> but I can't find a way of setting CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH in KDevelop that works.
> Adding it to environment variables does not do anything, and cmake fails to
> find the
On Monday, October 24, 2011 16:53:23 James Turner wrote:
>
> Mathias' suggestion also works, BTW - specify CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH, with one
> (or several) paths to search - I tested that this morning and updated the
> README.
>
> As you guessed, manually setting the the detection variables
> (SIMGEAR_
21 matches
Mail list logo
