Am 16.12.11 18:08, schrieb HB-GRAL:
Am 16.12.11 11:26, schrieb HB-GRAL:
Am 15.12.11 23:13, schrieb Martin Spott:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The other one, which used to be non-op, seems to have gained operational
capability along the way.
You see, in order to avoid confusion, having just one
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 23:09 +0100, HB-GRAL wrote:
Attached you find the list. There are 55 BAK12 and 23 BAK14 devices,
156 items total, all in the US and found in recent FAA runway data.
The coordinates comes from column base/reciprocal ends of runways,
published by FAA, assuming myself
Am 16.12.11 09:38, schrieb Erik Hofman:
That's probably wrong most of the time. I think the start of the
blastpad is more accurate most of the time.
Erik
Oh no! The blastpad is ALWAYS outside the runway. In xplane specs, and
also in FAA specs !
Cheers, Yves
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:42 +0100, HB-GRAL wrote:
Am 16.12.11 09:38, schrieb Erik Hofman:
That's probably wrong most of the time. I think the start of the
blastpad is more accurate most of the time.
Oh no! The blastpad is ALWAYS outside the runway. In xplane specs, and
also in FAA
Am 15.12.11 23:13, schrieb Martin Spott:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The other one, which used to be non-op, seems to have gained operational
capability along the way.
You see, in order to avoid confusion, having just one operational
arrestor would have been the clever solution.
We're trying to
Am 16.12.11 11:26, schrieb HB-GRAL:
Am 15.12.11 23:13, schrieb Martin Spott:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The other one, which used to be non-op, seems to have gained operational
capability along the way.
You see, in order to avoid confusion, having just one operational
arrestor would have been
Hello Yves,
Arresting cables for runways do already exist in FG: see them in action at LFRJ
Naval Base for instance.
Olivier
--
10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation
Server virtualization is being driven by many
Am 15.12.11 18:26, schrieb Olivier:
Hello Yves,
Arresting cables for runways do already exist in FG: see them in action at
LFRJ Naval Base for instance.
Olivier
Errm, Is this BAK12/14 or MA1A, ES or E28/B ? ;-)
Cheers, Yves
HB-GRAL
-Original Message-
From: [mailto:flightg...@sablonier.ch]
Sent: 15 December 2011 17:37
To: Olivier; FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re : Arresting Type Devices
Am 15.12.11 18:26, schrieb Olivier:
Hello Yves,
Arresting cables
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The ones I did in fgdata are BAK12.
Just for the record, the original BAK-12 was provided by David Culp:
http://scenemodels.flightgear.org/modeledit.php?id=918
We're having two models of a BAK-12 in the Base Package because some
people here are incapable to comprehend
Am 15.12.11 20:39, schrieb Martin Spott:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The ones I did in fgdata are BAK12.
Just for the record, the original BAK-12 was provided by David Culp:
http://scenemodels.flightgear.org/modeledit.php?id=918
We're having two models of a BAK-12 in the Base Package because
Martin
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The ones I did in fgdata are BAK12.
Just for the record, the original BAK-12 was provided by David Culp:
http://scenemodels.flightgear.org/modeledit.php?id=918
We're having two models of a BAK-12 in the Base Package because some
people here are
HB-GRAL wrote:
And close to my nose I see here some mystic FAA data output:
[...]
Is this something that could/should come to the scenery database somehow ?
Generally I'd say: Great ! but I'd feel best if I knew that these
positions really match the touchdown areas of 'our' runways. How
-Original Message-
From: Martin Spott [mailto:martin.sp...@mgras.net]
Sent: 15 December 2011 19:39
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re : Arresting Type Devices
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The ones I did in fgdata are BAK12.
Just
Am 15.12.11 22:37, schrieb Martin Spott:
HB-GRAL wrote:
And close to my nose I see here some mystic FAA data output:
[...]
Is this something that could/should come to the scenery database somehow ?
Generally I'd say: Great ! but I'd feel best if I knew that these
positions really
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The other one, which used to be non-op, seems to have gained operational
capability along the way.
You see, in order to avoid confusion, having just one operational
arrestor would have been the clever solution.
We're trying to simulate real-world, don't we ? Sure, we're
HB-GRAL wrote:
The coordinates comes from column base/reciprocal ends of runways,
is your definition supposed to be identical to runway centerline
at threshold ?
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Am 15.12.11 23:21, schrieb Martin Spott:
HB-GRAL wrote:
The coordinates comes from column base/reciprocal ends of runways,
is your definition supposed to be identical to runway centerline
at threshold ?
Cheers,
Martin.
It is Latitude/Longitude of physical runway
Am 15.12.11 23:49, schrieb HB-GRAL:
EDF 06BAK12 61.248633 -149.844258333 AVN 08.11.03
EDF 16BAK12 61.262069 -149.793475 AVN 08.11.03
BIG 19BAK12 64.0077345 -145.707352861 AVN 02/16/2007
EIL 14BAK12 64.684208 -147.117919444
19 matches
Mail list logo