hi, there!
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, John DeBoskey wrote:
>There appears to be a problem with gdb when debugging
> dynamically loaded images. On 5.0-current with
> sources current and built as of this evenning and a
> 4.1-STABLE system, the following incorrect result is seen:
PR/20373
Solution:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Visigoth wrote:
> dpt0: port 0xdc60-0xdc7f irq 16 at
> device 8.0 on pci 2
>
> even though bios asigned it irq 9... hmmm
Is this an SMP box or a UP box in APIC mode or something strange?
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD |
| [
Hi,
There appears to be a problem with gdb when debugging
dynamically loaded images. On 5.0-current with
sources current and built as of this evenning and a
4.1-STABLE system, the following incorrect result is seen:
%gdb ./testmain
GNU gdb 4.18
(gdb) b main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x804853f: file tes
At 10:05 +0900 08/25/2000, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> I have same problem with today's -current.
This problem was fixed by
At 13:22 -0700 08/24/2000, Peter Wemm wrote:
> peter 2000/08/24 13:22:44 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> usr.bin/systat swap.c
> Log:
> Quick Fix: swap.c doesn't
I have same problem with today's -current.
At 24 Aug 2000 23:23:30 GMT,
Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> make buildworld failed this morning.
> Error messages are as follows:
>
> ===> usr.bin/systat
>
> [snip]
>
> cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/systat/../../sys
>-I/usr/ob
All,
please review, test and commit (if no objection :-) attached patch for
tap driver. this is to support new devfs.
thanks,
emax
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
if_tap.c.diff
Hi,
If you have the time, I would very much appreciate any reviews on a
couple of helper functions that I've put together for manipulating the
i386 debug registers:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bsd/i386watch/
I've had these in my toolkit for a long time and present them here,
slightly mod
make buildworld failed this morning.
Error messages are as follows:
===> usr.bin/systat
[snip]
cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/systat/../../sys -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include
-c /usr/src/usr.bin/systat/swap.c
In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/systat/swap.c:47:
/usr/src/usr.bin/syst
* Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000824 14:52] wrote:
> I don't know if this is related to the problems you guys are looking at,
> but I have a box that every so often (every couple of months) panics
> with a "panic: recieve 1" panic. This panic happens when the socket
> character count is bogu
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 05:19:34PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> So I'm a bit stumped as far as formulating an easy How-To-Repeat is
> concerned. :-(
How about wedging a printenv into the makefile, before the call
to awk, so that you can re-create the environment when testing
it?
--
Andrew
T
I don't know if this is related to the problems you guys are looking at,
but I have a box that every so often (every couple of months) panics
with a "panic: recieve 1" panic. This panic happens when the socket
character count is bogus during a recv(2), etc. system call.
So several months ago I ca
Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami writes:
> * However, I was wondering if there was anyone who could fix things that
> * weren't PREFIX clean who would also find them on a regular
> * basis. That's not you.
>
> I can help you when the new package building cluster (being put
> together by Paul Saa
In list.freebsd-current Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sheldon Hearn writes:
> : On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:36:56 +0100, Konstantin Chuguev wrote:
> :
> : > Just wondering: what is the reason of using /opt instead of /usr/local,
> : > apart from Solaris i
I also was able to get it to run properly when not redirecting to a file.
I wonder if there might be some dependancy in the system that causes
different behavior with this when output is to a tty vs. a
filehandle.
I tried this with a copy of /bin/sh from 4.0-RELEASE, and had the same
result, so
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: Yes, local stuff. IMHO, the Ports Collection using /usr/local was the
: biggest mistake of it. The ports collection should have used /usr/pkg/
: as NetBSD does. I have to create /usr/truely-local on my FreeBSD
: machines.
But the ports c
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sheldon Hearn writes:
: On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:36:56 +0100, Konstantin Chuguev wrote:
:
: > Just wondering: what is the reason of using /opt instead of /usr/local,
: > apart from Solaris influence? Do you use /usr/local for anything?
:
: NetBSD uses /usr/opt . It'
I have a patch I want you to try, please get in contact with me!
Thanks!
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> I don't remember seeing a verbose boot log posted so I can't really say
> whats wrong. There is no difference b/t the -CURRENT and 4-STABLE
> versions of dpt_pci.c so I'm not sure what could be causing
In /etc/rc, rc.i386 is invoked before rc.devfs. This causes moused to fail to
start for those people who use a link from /dev/ to /dev/mouse. The
fix seems to be to switch the order of invocation:
# Run rc.devfs if readable to customize devfs
#
if [ -r /etc/rc.devfs ]; then
sh /etc/rc.de
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000 12:27:01 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > awk: ./guile-snarf.awk:17: (FILENAME=- FNR=9680) fatal error: internal
> > error
> > Abort trap - core dumped
> > *** Error code 1
>
> I get the same thing here. Inspecting the core dump, one finds that the
> abort() happens in eval
Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami writes:
> * From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Mike Meyer wrote:
> * > How does it decide whether or not a package conforms?
> * Probably by looking for files which get installed in /usr/local or
> * /usr/X11R6 instead of ${LOCALBAS
Try making them small critical sections. If it makes it easier,
which it probably will, try this: pass the pointer to sb_hiwat as an
argument to chgsbsize and make that the only way to modify it (sockbuf
creation would have to be a place where it's initialized manually to
0 ;) I'd say stick the h
On Thu 2000-08-24 (20:52), Andrew Reilly wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 10:54:44PM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> > However, note that you need to move LOCALBASE and X11BASE for *all*
> > ports, not one. (For instance, you can't expect an emacs-lisp package
> > to install correc
In list.freebsd-current Kenneth D. Merry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 20:43:15 -0400, Laurence Berland wrote:
> > On a vaguely related topic, after much searching I can't seem to see one
> > way or the other if we can do a complete bit-by-bit copy of a cd with
> > eithe
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 10:54:44PM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> However, note that you need to move LOCALBASE and X11BASE for *all*
> ports, not one. (For instance, you can't expect an emacs-lisp package
> to install correctly if you just try to move it while emacs is still
> in
Mark Murray wrote:
>
> > Why does crypt need to be in libc? Not even a significant fraction of
> > applications need crypt?
>
> Goes for very many libc components. Quite a lot of userland needs libcrypt
> (not much as a proportion, but a non-insignificant number).
This runs counter to my gut i
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> green 2000/08/23 04:41:01 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> secure/lib/libcrypto Makefile Makefile.inc
> Log:
> Generate a new evp.h at build-time instead of install-time to properly
> support NFS(ro) installworlds.
>
> Revision Changes
27 matches
Mail list logo
